The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 42372, Sacramento, Kentucky is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.52 percent of the residents in 42372 has some form of health insurance. 52.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42372 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 277 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42372. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 295 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 749 health care providers accessible to residents in 42372, Sacramento, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 42372, Sacramento, Kentucky
Lung Cancer Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 67 |
Provider Score | 58 |
Hospital Score | 51 |
Travel Score | 35 |
42372 | Sacramento | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Owensboro, KY (42372) & Sacramento, CA Primary Care
This analysis provides a comparative 'Lung Cancer Score' assessment, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care relevant to lung cancer detection and management within ZIP code 42372 (Owensboro, Kentucky) and the broader context of primary care access in Sacramento, California. The score considers factors crucial for early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and patient support, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources.
**Owensboro, Kentucky (42372): A Rural Perspective**
Owensboro, a city in western Kentucky, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities in primary care. The area is characterized by a more rural demographic, which can influence healthcare access. The 'Lung Cancer Score' for 42372 is significantly impacted by the physician-to-patient ratio. While data fluctuates, the ratio in Daviess County (where Owensboro is located) may present a challenge. This means that access to primary care physicians, crucial for routine screenings and early detection, might be somewhat limited compared to more urban areas.
Standout practices in Owensboro are likely to be those that prioritize patient-centered care and proactive screening. This includes practices that actively encourage annual check-ups, especially for patients with a history of smoking or other risk factors. Practices that offer on-site imaging services, such as X-rays, can also contribute positively to the score by streamlining the diagnostic process. The presence of dedicated lung cancer specialists and pulmonologists within the broader healthcare network is also a critical factor, influencing the overall score.
Telemedicine adoption in Owensboro, and rural areas in general, can be a significant factor in improving the 'Lung Cancer Score'. Telemedicine enables patients to access consultations with specialists remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care, particularly for those in geographically isolated areas. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring, contribute positively to the score.
Mental health resources are another important component of the 'Lung Cancer Score'. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally taxing. Primary care practices that offer or have strong referral networks to mental health professionals, including therapists and counselors, are vital for supporting patients through the emotional and psychological challenges of the disease. The availability of support groups and patient education programs also plays a significant role.
**Sacramento, California: Urban Considerations**
Sacramento, a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of dynamics for primary care and lung cancer management. The 'Lung Cancer Score' in Sacramento benefits from a potentially higher physician-to-patient ratio compared to Owensboro, offering greater access to primary care physicians. However, the sheer size of the city and its diverse population can also create challenges related to equitable access to care.
Standout practices in Sacramento are likely to be those that emphasize preventive care and early detection, including proactive screening programs for high-risk individuals. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively, allowing for seamless coordination of care and tracking of patient health data, can contribute to a higher score. The presence of integrated healthcare systems, where primary care physicians work closely with specialists, can improve the overall quality of care.
Telemedicine adoption in Sacramento is likely to be more prevalent than in Owensboro, given the city's higher technological infrastructure and access to resources. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals contribute to the score. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments or who require follow-up care after treatment.
Mental health resources are also a crucial component of the 'Lung Cancer Score' in Sacramento. Given the potential for higher stress levels and the greater diversity of the population, the availability of mental health services, including counseling, therapy, and support groups, is essential. Primary care practices that prioritize mental health, offering on-site services or strong referral networks, contribute to a higher score.
**Comparative Analysis and Overall Considerations**
The 'Lung Cancer Score' is not simply a numerical ranking. It is a holistic assessment of the healthcare ecosystem's capacity to support patients through the entire lung cancer journey, from early detection to treatment and survivorship. Both Owensboro and Sacramento have strengths and weaknesses. Owensboro may be challenged by its rural setting and potentially lower physician-to-patient ratio, but it could improve its score through telemedicine adoption and increased focus on mental health resources. Sacramento, with its larger population and more robust infrastructure, may have better access to specialists and a higher physician-to-patient ratio, but it must address potential disparities in access and ensure that all patients receive equitable care.
Ultimately, the 'Lung Cancer Score' is a dynamic measure that evolves over time. Healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations all play a vital role in improving the score by addressing the unique challenges and opportunities in their respective regions.
**Call to Action**
For a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in these areas, including a visual representation of physician locations, healthcare facilities, and demographic data relevant to lung cancer risk factors, explore CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing healthcare data, allowing you to identify areas of need and opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like