01034, Granville, Massachusetts Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 01034, Granville, Massachusetts is 89 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.08 percent of the residents in 01034 has some form of health insurance. 33.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01034 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 336 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01034. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 408 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 520 health care providers accessible to residents in 01034, Granville, Massachusetts.

The following analysis assesses lung cancer care within ZIP code 01034, focusing on primary care accessibility in Granville and its surrounding areas. This evaluation considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, ultimately providing a comprehensive 'Lung Cancer Score' perspective.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests upon accessible primary care. Within Granville, assessing primary care availability is paramount. A robust primary care infrastructure ensures early detection, timely referrals, and ongoing patient support, all crucial for positive outcomes. The geographic distribution of primary care physicians, the capacity of their practices, and the ease with which patients can secure appointments are all essential elements in this assessment.

Physician-to-patient ratios offer a crucial insight into the accessibility of care. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, often translates to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to preventative screenings and consultations. Analyzing the physician density within 01034 and the surrounding areas provides a baseline understanding of the resources available to the population. Comparing this ratio to regional and national averages can highlight areas of strength or concern.

Identifying standout practices requires evaluating several criteria. These include the adoption of evidence-based practices, patient satisfaction scores, and the implementation of innovative approaches to care. Practices that actively participate in lung cancer screening programs, demonstrate a commitment to early detection, and offer comprehensive patient education are likely to receive higher scores. Furthermore, practices that collaborate effectively with specialists, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, contribute to a more integrated and coordinated care experience.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, particularly in rural areas. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, remote monitoring, and virtual support groups can significantly enhance access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in geographically isolated locations. Evaluating the extent to which practices within 01034 have embraced telemedicine provides valuable insights into their capacity to reach and support patients effectively.

The emotional and psychological impact of a lung cancer diagnosis is substantial. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive care. Practices that offer or refer patients to mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services demonstrate a commitment to addressing the holistic needs of their patients. Assessing the integration of these resources within the primary care setting provides a more complete picture of the care landscape.

Analyzing the data collected from various sources, including physician directories, patient reviews, and publicly available health data, allows for the creation of a 'Lung Cancer Score' for doctors in ZIP code 01034. This score is not a definitive ranking but rather a composite measure reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of lung cancer care within the specified geographic area. The score considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources.

The evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios is a core element. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of physicians, would negatively impact the score. Conversely, a high ratio, suggesting ample physician availability, would contribute positively. The score also incorporates the presence of practices demonstrating excellence in lung cancer screening, early detection, and patient education. These practices, through their commitment to best practices, would enhance the overall score.

Telemedicine integration is another significant factor. Practices actively utilizing telehealth technologies, offering virtual consultations, and providing remote monitoring capabilities would receive higher marks. This reflects a commitment to expanding access to care and supporting patients remotely. The inclusion of mental health resources is also essential. Practices that offer or facilitate access to mental health professionals and support groups would have a positive influence on the score.

The 'Lung Cancer Score' is a dynamic measure. It can be updated periodically to reflect changes in physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolution of best practices. This iterative approach ensures that the score remains relevant and accurately reflects the current state of lung cancer care within 01034. The score aims to provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

The overall assessment of primary care availability in Granville and its surrounding areas, combined with the 'Lung Cancer Score' analysis, offers a comprehensive perspective on the healthcare landscape. This analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, providing valuable information for patients seeking care and for healthcare providers striving to improve their services. The goal is to facilitate informed decision-making and to drive improvements in the quality and accessibility of lung cancer care.

Understanding the geographic distribution of healthcare resources is critical for improving access to care. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data analyzed, allowing for a clear understanding of physician density, practice locations, and the distribution of mental health resources. Visualize this data to make informed decisions.