Lung Cancer Score

01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.57 percent of the residents in 01952 has some form of health insurance. 42.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.33 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01952 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,516 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01952. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,928 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,258 health care providers accessible to residents in 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts.

Health Scores in 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts

Lung Cancer Score 59
People Score 28
Provider Score 65
Hospital Score 53
Travel Score 59

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

01952 Salisbury Massachusetts
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Salisbury, MA (01952)

Analyzing the landscape of lung cancer care within Salisbury, Massachusetts (ZIP code 01952) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the crucial element of mental health support, ultimately culminating in a ‘Lung Cancer Score’ assessment. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the resources available to patients facing this challenging diagnosis.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on the availability of skilled physicians. In Salisbury, primary care physicians (PCPs) serve as the initial point of contact, crucial for early detection and referral. Determining the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. Publicly available data from sources like the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the US Census Bureau can provide population estimates for the 01952 ZIP code. Cross-referencing this with the number of practicing PCPs in the area, derived from physician directories and insurance provider networks, allows for a preliminary physician-to-patient ratio calculation. A lower ratio indicates better access to primary care, a critical factor in timely diagnosis and treatment. This initial assessment forms the base of our Lung Cancer Score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and characteristics of the medical practices themselves are vital. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating factors like accreditation by reputable organizations (e.g., the Joint Commission), patient reviews, and the breadth of services offered. Practices with a multidisciplinary approach, integrating PCPs, pulmonologists, oncologists, and potentially thoracic surgeons, receive a higher score. The availability of on-site diagnostic imaging, such as CT scans and X-rays, streamlines the diagnostic process and improves patient outcomes. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in clinical trials or offer access to cutting-edge treatments contribute positively to the score.

Technological integration is another significant aspect of the Lung Cancer Score. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices that offer telehealth consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and even initial consultations receive a higher score. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is also crucial. EHRs facilitate seamless information sharing between healthcare providers, improving care coordination and reducing the risk of medical errors. Practices utilizing patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical records and communicate with their providers, are viewed favorably.

The often-overlooked element of mental health support is an integral component of the Lung Cancer Score. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, are given a significant advantage. This can involve on-site mental health services, referrals to specialized providers, or integration of mental health screenings into routine care. Practices that proactively address the psychological needs of their patients demonstrate a holistic approach to care, which is critical for overall well-being and treatment adherence.

The availability of lung cancer screening programs, adhering to current guidelines (e.g., those from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force), is also a key factor. Practices that actively promote and facilitate lung cancer screening for eligible patients, particularly those with a history of smoking, contribute to a higher score. This includes providing education about the benefits of screening, assisting patients in scheduling screenings, and ensuring timely follow-up for any abnormal findings.

The Lung Cancer Score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment reflecting the evolving healthcare landscape. It’s a relative ranking, comparing the resources available in Salisbury to those in similar communities. The score is calculated based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, technological integration, mental health resources, and screening program availability are all assigned specific weights based on their relative importance in delivering high-quality lung cancer care.

For example, a practice with a lower physician-to-patient ratio, offering a multidisciplinary approach, utilizing telemedicine, providing robust mental health support, and actively promoting lung cancer screening would receive a significantly higher score. Conversely, a practice with limited resources, lacking technological integration, and failing to address the mental health needs of its patients would receive a lower score.

The final Lung Cancer Score for Salisbury, MA (01952) would be presented as a composite score, reflecting the overall strength of the healthcare infrastructure in supporting lung cancer patients. This score would be accompanied by a detailed analysis, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. It would also provide specific recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of PCPs, expanding telemedicine services, and integrating mental health support into routine care.

Understanding the primary care availability in Salisbury is crucial for assessing the overall health of the community. The availability of primary care providers directly impacts the early detection and management of lung cancer. A robust primary care system, with readily accessible PCPs, is essential for timely referrals to specialists and the initiation of appropriate diagnostic testing. The analysis of primary care availability must consider factors like insurance acceptance, appointment wait times, and the availability of after-hours care. These factors directly influence a patient's ability to access care when they need it most.

The Lung Cancer Score analysis for Salisbury is a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It provides a clear and concise overview of the resources available to lung cancer patients in the community, empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their care. It also helps identify areas where improvements are needed, ultimately leading to better outcomes for patients. The score is a snapshot in time, reflecting the current state of the healthcare system.

For a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and population demographics, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations that can help you understand the spatial relationships between healthcare providers and the community, providing a more nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in Salisbury, MA (01952).

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts

You may also like

01950, Newburyport, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 2.15 Miles

Total Population:

01922, Byfield, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 3.03 Miles

Total Population:

01913, Amesbury, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 3.04 Miles

Total Population:

01951, Newbury, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 4.10 Miles

Total Population:

01985, West Newbury, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 6.60 Miles

Total Population:

01938, Ipswich, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 8.26 Miles

Total Population:

01969, Rowley, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 9.12 Miles

Total Population:

01921, Boxford, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 13.01 Miles

Total Population:

01983, Topsfield, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 01952: 14.60 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 01952, Salisbury, Massachusetts