02713, Cuttyhunk, Massachusetts Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 02713, Cuttyhunk, Massachusetts is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 64.71 percent of the residents in 02713 has some form of health insurance. 23.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02713 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02713. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 593 health care providers accessible to residents in 02713, Cuttyhunk, Massachusetts.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 02713 and Primary Care Availability in Cuttyhunk**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially regarding lung cancer care, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on two distinct areas: the availability of doctors in ZIP code 02713 and the primary care resources on Cuttyhunk, a small island. We will assess factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical components in managing a disease as complex as lung cancer.

ZIP code 02713, likely encompassing a town or region on the mainland, presents a different healthcare landscape compared to the isolated environment of Cuttyhunk. Examining physician-to-patient ratios in 02713 is the first step. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can significantly impact access to care, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment for lung cancer. The analysis would need to consider the specialties of available physicians, specifically the presence of pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, all vital in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Furthermore, the age and experience of these specialists are crucial; seasoned professionals often possess greater expertise in managing complex cases.

Standout practices within 02713 would be those demonstrating excellence in lung cancer care. This could be assessed through several metrics, including patient outcomes (survival rates, disease progression), adherence to national guidelines for screening and treatment, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that offer comprehensive services, such as smoking cessation programs, early detection screenings (low-dose CT scans), and access to clinical trials, would be highly regarded. The presence of multidisciplinary teams, bringing together pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and other specialists, is another indicator of a superior practice.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly in areas with limited access to specialists. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide access to educational resources can significantly improve the quality of care. Practices in 02713 that have embraced telemedicine, especially for follow-up appointments and consultations, would be favorably evaluated. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine hinges on reliable internet access and patient comfort with technology.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical in lung cancer care. A diagnosis of lung cancer can trigger significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and fear. Practices offering access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, or collaborating with mental health providers, would receive a higher score. This integration of mental health support can improve patient well-being and enhance their ability to cope with the challenges of treatment.

Turning to Cuttyhunk, the analysis takes a different turn. The primary care availability on this small island is the primary concern. The physician-to-patient ratio on Cuttyhunk is likely to be significantly lower than in 02713. The island's limited population and geographic isolation pose significant challenges to healthcare access. A single primary care physician, or even a visiting nurse, might be the only medical resource available.

The absence of specialists on Cuttyhunk means that patients with suspected lung cancer would need to be transported to the mainland for diagnosis and treatment. This creates significant logistical hurdles and can delay care. The availability of a reliable transportation system, such as a medical helicopter or boat, is crucial.

Telemedicine could be a lifeline for Cuttyhunk residents. The ability to consult with specialists remotely, receive diagnostic interpretations, and manage chronic conditions can significantly improve the quality of care. The island's internet infrastructure and the availability of telemedicine-enabled devices become paramount.

Mental health resources on Cuttyhunk are likely to be scarce. The isolation of island life can exacerbate mental health challenges. The ability to access mental health support, even through telemedicine, is essential. Collaboration with mainland mental health providers would be critical.

The overall Lung Cancer Score for 02713 and Cuttyhunk would reflect the different challenges and opportunities in each location. 02713, with its potentially greater access to specialists and resources, might receive a higher score than Cuttyhunk. However, the score would be influenced by the quality of care available in 02713, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Cuttyhunk’s score would be heavily dependent on its primary care availability, its transportation infrastructure, and its ability to leverage telemedicine to connect with mainland resources.

In conclusion, assessing lung cancer care requires a comprehensive approach, considering factors beyond just the number of doctors. It involves evaluating the quality of care, the adoption of technology, and the availability of mental health support. The analysis of 02713 and Cuttyhunk highlights the diverse challenges and opportunities in providing effective lung cancer care, emphasizing the importance of tailored solutions for each community.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in these areas, and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, we recommend utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, hospital locations, and other relevant data, aiding in a deeper understanding of healthcare access and the challenges faced by individuals affected by lung cancer.