The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 39066, Edwards, Mississippi is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.33 percent of the residents in 39066 has some form of health insurance. 50.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.66 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39066 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,529 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39066. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 963 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 694 health care providers accessible to residents in 39066, Edwards, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39066, Edwards, Mississippi
Lung Cancer Score | 9 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 27 |
Hospital Score | 26 |
Travel Score | 19 |
39066 | Edwards | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Edwards, MS (ZIP Code 39066)
This analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and support within the Edwards, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39066) area, focusing on primary care availability and the overall preparedness of local physicians. The goal is to provide actionable insights for residents and healthcare providers, ultimately aiming to improve the quality of care for those affected by this serious disease.
The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a crucial starting point. Early detection of lung cancer significantly improves survival rates, and PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. Edwards, being a relatively small community, likely faces challenges in maintaining a robust physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio represents the number of patients served by each physician. A low ratio indicates a greater availability of care, leading to shorter wait times for appointments and more personalized attention. Conversely, a high ratio can strain resources, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Specific data on the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 39066 is essential for a truly accurate assessment. However, national averages and comparisons to similar rural areas can offer a comparative benchmark. Further investigation would involve examining the number of PCPs actively practicing within the zip code, considering factors like retirement, and identifying the patient population served.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and accessibility of primary care services are paramount. Are the PCPs in Edwards equipped with the latest diagnostic tools, such as access to low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, recommended for high-risk individuals? Do they actively participate in continuing medical education to stay abreast of the latest advancements in lung cancer screening and treatment? Are they proactive in educating patients about risk factors like smoking cessation and the importance of early detection? The answers to these questions are critical in evaluating the effectiveness of primary care in the area.
Identifying standout practices within the Edwards area can highlight best practices and potential areas for improvement. Practices that prioritize preventative care, offer comprehensive patient education, and maintain strong referral networks with specialists are likely to provide superior care. Examining the patient satisfaction scores, the frequency of preventative screenings, and the timeliness of referrals can help identify these exemplary practices. This also involves assessing the availability of specialized services, such as pulmonologists, oncologists, and radiation oncologists, within a reasonable distance. Easy access to these specialists is crucial for patients diagnosed with lung cancer.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care, particularly in rural areas. It allows patients to consult with specialists, receive follow-up care, and participate in support groups without the need for extensive travel. The extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs and specialists in Edwards should be evaluated. Do they offer virtual consultations? Do they utilize remote monitoring technologies? Are they equipped to provide telehealth services for patients undergoing treatment? The answers to these questions reveal the degree to which technology is being leveraged to enhance the delivery of care.
Mental health resources are often overlooked, but they are essential for patients diagnosed with lung cancer and their families. The emotional and psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis can be profound. Access to mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services is crucial for helping patients cope with the challenges of their illness. The availability of these resources within Edwards and the surrounding areas should be assessed. Are there mental health professionals practicing locally? Are there support groups available? Are these services readily accessible and affordable? The answers will reveal the level of support available to patients and their families.
The overall lung cancer score for Edwards would be a composite of these factors. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of diagnostic tools, the adoption of telemedicine, the quality of primary care, the presence of specialized services, and the accessibility of mental health resources. This score could be presented as a numerical value or a qualitative rating, such as "Excellent," "Good," "Fair," or "Poor." The score would serve as a benchmark for measuring the community's preparedness to address lung cancer.
Improving the lung cancer score in Edwards requires a multi-pronged approach. It may involve recruiting more PCPs, increasing access to screening programs, promoting telemedicine adoption, enhancing mental health services, and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers. Community outreach programs, public awareness campaigns, and partnerships with local organizations can also play a vital role. The goal is to create a healthcare ecosystem that prioritizes early detection, comprehensive treatment, and compassionate support for individuals affected by lung cancer.
This analysis has highlighted the crucial aspects of healthcare in Edwards, MS (ZIP Code 39066), specifically concerning lung cancer. The assessment of primary care availability, the evaluation of standout practices, the examination of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources are all essential components. The data gathered helps to determine the overall preparedness of the community to handle lung cancer cases.
To gain a visual and interactive understanding of healthcare resources in Edwards and beyond, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a comprehensive overview of healthcare providers, their specializations, and the availability of services in your area. They can offer a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and community stakeholders.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like