39140, Newhebron, Mississippi Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 39140, Newhebron, Mississippi is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.06 percent of the residents in 39140 has some form of health insurance. 38.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39140 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 732 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39140. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 239 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 315 health care providers accessible to residents in 39140, Newhebron, Mississippi.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Newhebron, MS (ZIP Code 39140)

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment within ZIP code 39140 (Newhebron, Mississippi). The primary focus is on primary care access, physician-to-patient ratios, and the availability of services crucial for lung cancer patients, including mental health support and telemedicine options. A "Lung Cancer Score" isn't a standardized metric, but this analysis will provide a qualitative assessment of the healthcare landscape.

Newhebron, a rural community, likely faces challenges common to such areas: limited access to specialized medical care and a potentially aging population with higher rates of chronic diseases, including lung cancer risk factors like smoking. Therefore, this analysis will highlight both opportunities and potential shortcomings in the local healthcare infrastructure.

**Primary Care Availability and Physician-to-Patient Ratios:**

The foundation of any effective lung cancer care pathway lies in strong primary care. Early detection and referral are critical. Assessing primary care availability begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Mississippi State Department of Health are essential for this. If the area is designated as a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) for primary care, it immediately signals a potential barrier to timely access.

The presence of a sufficient number of primary care physicians (PCPs) is paramount. The analysis will need to identify the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the estimated population served. A high ratio (e.g., a large number of patients per physician) indicates potential difficulties in scheduling appointments, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a low ratio is more favorable.

The analysis should also investigate the types of primary care practices available. Are there solo practitioners, group practices, or federally qualified health centers (FQHCs)? FQHCs often serve underserved populations and may offer a broader range of services. The presence of a community health center could be a positive indicator.

**Standout Practices and Their Impact:**

Identifying standout practices requires evaluating several factors. This includes the presence of electronic health records (EHRs) and their integration with specialists. EHRs facilitate seamless information sharing, crucial for coordinating care. Practices that actively participate in population health initiatives, such as those focused on smoking cessation or chronic disease management, are also noteworthy.

Practices that demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, including lung cancer screening (if available and appropriate for the population), would receive a higher score. This involves offering smoking cessation programs, providing education on lung cancer risk factors, and proactively screening eligible patients.

The analysis should also consider patient satisfaction. Online reviews and patient feedback can provide valuable insights into the quality of care and the patient experience. Practices with positive reviews and a reputation for compassionate care would be considered more favorable.

**Telemedicine Adoption and Its Implications:**

Telemedicine offers a potential solution to overcome geographical barriers and improve access to specialized care. The analysis will assess the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care practices in the area. Do they offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, or access to specialists via telehealth platforms?

Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for lung cancer patients, allowing them to consult with pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists without traveling long distances. It can also facilitate remote monitoring of symptoms and medication adherence.

The analysis should also consider the availability of reliable internet access in the area, as this is a prerequisite for effective telemedicine. Limited broadband access could significantly hinder the adoption and effectiveness of telemedicine services.

**Mental Health Resources: A Crucial Component:**

Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging. Access to mental health resources is essential for supporting patients throughout their journey. The analysis will investigate the availability of mental health services within the ZIP code or nearby.

This includes identifying psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Are these services readily accessible, or are there long wait times for appointments? The analysis should also consider the availability of support groups and other mental health resources specifically tailored to cancer patients.

The integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also a positive indicator. Co-locating mental health professionals with primary care providers can improve access and coordination of care.

**Specific Considerations for 39140:**

Given the rural nature of Newhebron, the analysis will need to account for potential challenges such as limited transportation options and a potentially older population. The analysis must also consider the demographics of the area. Does the population have a high prevalence of smoking? Are there other factors, such as environmental exposures, that could increase the risk of lung cancer?

The analysis should also assess the availability of support services such as patient navigators, who can help patients navigate the healthcare system and access resources.

**Overall Assessment and Conclusion:**

The "Lung Cancer Score" for Newhebron (ZIP code 39140) will be a composite assessment based on the factors outlined above. It will not be a numerical score but a qualitative evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. The analysis will provide insights into areas where improvements are needed to enhance access to care and support for lung cancer patients.

The analysis will conclude with a summary of the findings, highlighting the key challenges and opportunities. This will include recommendations for improving access to primary care, increasing telemedicine adoption, and strengthening mental health support services.

**Call to Action:**

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Newhebron and surrounding areas, explore CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, healthcare facility accessibility, and other relevant data points. Visit CartoChrome today to gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare resources available in your community.