39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.68 percent of the residents in 39150 has some form of health insurance. 47.22 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 45.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39150 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39150. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 943 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 48 health care providers accessible to residents in 39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Port Gibson, MS (ZIP Code 39150)

This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP Code 39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi, focusing on factors crucial for early detection and patient support. The goal is to understand the landscape of care, considering primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, adoption of modern technologies, and the integration of mental health resources. The analysis informs a hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score" that would reflect the community's preparedness to address lung cancer, a disease where early diagnosis significantly improves outcomes.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on accessible and proactive primary care. In Port Gibson, the availability of PCPs is a critical starting point. The physician-to-patient ratio is a key metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and interventions. Researching the current physician-to-patient ratio in 39150 is the first step. Publicly available data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state health departments provides this vital information. A high ratio, for instance, would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the community is important. Are the practices concentrated in one area, or are they geographically dispersed to serve a wider population? Uneven distribution can create healthcare deserts, limiting access for residents in certain areas. The Lung Cancer Score needs to consider the geographic accessibility of these practices.

Standout practices within the area deserve recognition. These are clinics demonstrating excellence in patient care, particularly regarding lung cancer prevention and early detection. Key indicators include:

* **Proactive Screening Programs:** Do practices actively promote and facilitate lung cancer screenings, especially for high-risk individuals (smokers, former smokers, those with a family history)?
* **Smoking Cessation Support:** Do they offer comprehensive smoking cessation programs, including counseling, medication, and follow-up care?
* **Patient Education:** Are patients educated about lung cancer risks, symptoms, and the importance of early detection?
* **Care Coordination:** Do they have systems in place to coordinate care with specialists, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, if a patient is suspected of having lung cancer?

Identifying these practices and understanding their best practices would significantly boost the Lung Cancer Score.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas like Port Gibson. Telemedicine can facilitate:

* **Initial Consultations:** Remote appointments for initial assessments and discussions about risk factors.
* **Follow-up Care:** Convenient follow-up appointments for patients undergoing treatment or monitoring.
* **Specialist Consultations:** Facilitating access to specialists who may not be readily available in the local area.
* **Smoking Cessation Support:** Virtual support groups and counseling sessions.

The extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs in 39150 would directly influence the Lung Cancer Score. Practices embracing telemedicine would receive higher scores.

The integration of mental health resources is another critical element. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating. Patients often experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Primary care practices that offer or connect patients to mental health services demonstrate a commitment to holistic care. This includes:

* **On-site Mental Health Professionals:** Having therapists or counselors within the practice.
* **Referral Networks:** Established relationships with mental health providers in the community.
* **Screening for Mental Health Issues:** Routinely assessing patients for depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions.
* **Support Groups:** Facilitating or referring patients to support groups for individuals with cancer and their families.

The availability and integration of mental health services would contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score.

The Lung Cancer Score would also consider the availability of resources for financial assistance. Lung cancer treatment can be expensive, and financial burdens can significantly impact a patient's well-being and adherence to treatment. Practices that help patients access financial assistance programs, such as grants and patient assistance programs from pharmaceutical companies, would receive higher scores.

The final Lung Cancer Score would be a composite measure, reflecting the interplay of all these factors. It would provide a snapshot of the community's preparedness to address lung cancer. A high score would indicate a strong primary care infrastructure, proactive screening programs, telemedicine adoption, integrated mental health services, and a commitment to patient support. A low score would highlight areas for improvement, such as increasing the physician-to-patient ratio, expanding screening programs, and integrating mental health services.

The analysis would also include a section on data sources. This would list the sources used to gather the information, such as the HRSA, state health departments, and practice websites. It would also mention any limitations of the data, such as the potential for outdated information or incomplete data.

This assessment is a starting point. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure that the community is providing the best possible care for individuals at risk for or diagnosed with lung cancer.

To visualize the geographic distribution of PCPs, assess accessibility, and identify potential healthcare deserts, explore the power of data visualization. CartoChrome maps can transform raw data into actionable insights, allowing you to see the healthcare landscape of Port Gibson in a new light. **Visit CartoChrome today to explore the potential of interactive maps for healthcare analysis.**