39330, Enterprise, Mississippi Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 39330, Enterprise, Mississippi is 86 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.07 percent of the residents in 39330 has some form of health insurance. 25.85 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.44 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39330 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 528 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39330. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 614 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,168 health care providers accessible to residents in 39330, Enterprise, Mississippi.

This analysis evaluates the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 39330 and the broader primary care accessibility in Enterprise, Alabama, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of available resources. The focus is on factors crucial for patient outcomes, including physician availability, innovative care models, and mental health support.

The assessment begins with physician-to-patient ratios. ZIP code 39330, encompassing a specific geographic area, likely experiences a physician distribution pattern reflective of its surrounding region. Analyzing the ratio of primary care physicians and pulmonologists to the population is essential. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can create barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment. This is especially critical for lung cancer, where early detection significantly impacts survival rates. Data from state medical boards, the American Medical Association, and publicly available health datasets provide the basis for this calculation. The comparison with national or state averages reveals whether this area faces a shortage or has adequate access.

Primary care availability in Enterprise, a larger city, is a crucial element. Primary care physicians often serve as the initial point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. Their ability to conduct initial screenings, order diagnostic tests, and refer patients to specialists is paramount. The availability of primary care is evaluated by examining the number of practicing physicians in the area, the number of patients they serve, and the wait times for appointments. This information is often available through insurance provider directories, local hospital websites, and patient reviews.

Standout practices within the area are identified based on several criteria. These include the adoption of evidence-based practices in lung cancer screening and treatment, patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of multidisciplinary care teams. Practices that offer comprehensive services, including pulmonology, oncology, radiology, and potentially thoracic surgery, are highly valued. Furthermore, practices that participate in clinical trials or research initiatives demonstrate a commitment to advancing lung cancer care. Information on these practices can be obtained through hospital websites, professional organizations, and patient testimonials.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important. Telemedicine offers significant advantages, especially in rural areas where access to specialists may be limited. It allows for remote consultations, follow-up appointments, and the delivery of educational materials. The extent of telemedicine adoption is evaluated by assessing the availability of telehealth services offered by local practices and hospitals. This involves examining their websites, contacting their offices, and reviewing information from telehealth platforms. The effectiveness of telemedicine in improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs is also considered.

Mental health resources are integral to comprehensive cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can lead to significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and fear. Access to mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors, is vital for supporting patients throughout their journey. The availability of mental health services within the area is assessed by examining local hospital websites, mental health provider directories, and community resources. The integration of mental health services into cancer care pathways, such as offering counseling sessions within the oncology clinic, is a positive indicator.

The analysis incorporates data from several sources. The U.S. Census Bureau provides population data. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) offers information on physician participation and healthcare utilization. State medical boards and professional organizations, such as the American Lung Association and the American Cancer Society, provide data on physician licensing, specialties, and practice guidelines. Patient reviews and online forums offer insights into patient experiences and satisfaction levels. Local hospitals and clinics are contacted to gather information on services offered and telemedicine adoption.

The evaluation of lung cancer care in ZIP code 39330 and primary care accessibility in Enterprise is a complex undertaking. The physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support are crucial elements. Standout practices are identified based on their commitment to comprehensive, patient-centered care. The findings are used to create a Lung Cancer Score, which provides a comparative assessment of the area's strengths and weaknesses.

The Lung Cancer Score is not a static measure. It is subject to change based on evolving healthcare practices, technological advancements, and community needs. Regular updates are essential to maintain its relevance and ensure that it accurately reflects the current state of lung cancer care. The score should be interpreted in conjunction with other factors, such as individual patient characteristics, insurance coverage, and personal preferences.

The analysis also considers the impact of social determinants of health. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and health literacy can significantly influence patient outcomes. These factors are incorporated into the assessment to provide a more holistic understanding of the challenges and opportunities in lung cancer care. Addressing these social determinants is essential for achieving health equity and improving outcomes for all patients.

The final Lung Cancer Score is a composite metric, reflecting the weighted average of the various factors assessed. The weighting of each factor is determined based on its relative importance in influencing patient outcomes. The score is presented in a clear and concise format, allowing for easy comparison with other areas. The score is also accompanied by a detailed report that provides supporting data and analysis.

The Lung Cancer Score serves as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Patients can use it to make informed decisions about their care. Healthcare providers can use it to identify areas for improvement and to benchmark their performance against other practices. Policymakers can use it to allocate resources and to develop strategies to improve access to care and patient outcomes.

This detailed assessment provides a foundation for understanding the state of lung cancer care in the specified area. It highlights the importance of physician availability, innovative care models, and mental health support. The analysis aims to empower patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to work together to improve lung cancer care and outcomes.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, including physician locations, hospital access, and demographic data, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a detailed and dynamic view of healthcare resources, aiding in informed decision-making.