The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 39427, Carson, Mississippi is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 79.34 percent of the residents in 39427 has some form of health insurance. 46.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 42.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39427 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 295 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39427. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 248 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 822 health care providers accessible to residents in 39427, Carson, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39427, Carson, Mississippi
Lung Cancer Score | 27 |
---|---|
People Score | 29 |
Provider Score | 24 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 72 |
39427 | Carson | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Carson, MS (ZIP Code 39427) & Primary Care
This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 39427 (Carson, Mississippi) and the broader context of primary care accessibility in the area. We will assess the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem, focusing on factors that influence patient outcomes, including physician availability, technological integration, and the provision of mental health support. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the resources available to individuals facing a lung cancer diagnosis and to highlight areas for potential improvement.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on the availability of skilled primary care physicians (PCPs). In Carson, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, reflecting a shortage of PCPs, can lead to delayed diagnoses, less frequent screenings, and challenges in managing chronic conditions, all of which can negatively impact lung cancer outcomes. Data from the Mississippi State Department of Health, combined with information from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), will be crucial in determining the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 39427. This data should be compared to state and national averages to gauge the relative accessibility of primary care services in Carson.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is equally important. Are physicians concentrated in a single clinic, or are they spread throughout the community, making access easier for residents in different areas? The presence of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) or other safety-net providers can also be a significant factor, particularly for underserved populations. These facilities often provide comprehensive services, including primary care, preventative screenings, and assistance with accessing specialized care.
Evaluating the quality of primary care requires assessing the practices of individual physicians and clinics. This involves examining their adherence to evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening, such as those recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Practices that actively promote screening for high-risk individuals (e.g., current or former smokers) are likely to detect lung cancer at earlier, more treatable stages. Reviewing patient satisfaction surveys and online reviews can provide insights into the patient experience, including the ease of scheduling appointments, the quality of communication with physicians, and the overall level of care provided.
The integration of technology is another crucial element. Telemedicine, for example, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in Carson needs to be evaluated. Do physicians offer virtual consultations for routine check-ups, medication management, or follow-up appointments? Are they using remote monitoring devices to track patients' health conditions? The availability of electronic health records (EHRs) is also essential. EHRs facilitate the sharing of patient information among different healthcare providers, improving care coordination and reducing the risk of medical errors.
The emotional and psychological well-being of lung cancer patients is often overlooked, but it is a critical aspect of their overall health. The availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting and in the broader community is therefore essential. Do primary care practices offer on-site counseling services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals? Are there support groups or other resources available to help patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression that often accompany a cancer diagnosis? The integration of mental health services into primary care can improve patient outcomes and enhance their quality of life.
Standout practices within Carson deserve recognition. These are the clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality, patient-centered care. They may excel in areas such as lung cancer screening rates, patient satisfaction, telemedicine adoption, or the integration of mental health services. Identifying these practices can serve as a model for other providers in the area and can help patients make informed decisions about their care. This requires a deep dive into the available data, including quality metrics, patient reviews, and information on practice policies and procedures.
The analysis must also consider the broader healthcare landscape in Carson. This includes the availability of specialists, such as pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, who are essential for diagnosing and treating lung cancer. The proximity to hospitals and cancer centers, as well as the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies, are important factors. The presence of community resources, such as support groups, patient advocacy organizations, and transportation services, can also significantly impact patient outcomes.
Assessing the overall ‘Lung Cancer Score’ for Carson requires a holistic approach. It's a composite score based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above. A high score indicates a robust healthcare ecosystem with readily accessible primary care, advanced diagnostic and treatment options, and comprehensive support services. A low score suggests areas for improvement, such as a shortage of PCPs, limited access to specialists, or a lack of mental health resources. The score should be viewed as a dynamic measure, subject to change as healthcare providers adapt to new technologies, implement evidence-based practices, and respond to the evolving needs of the community.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Carson, and to identify the location of practices, specialists, and resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. This tool allows for the creation of interactive maps that display data on healthcare providers, population demographics, and other relevant information. This provides a comprehensive visual overview of the healthcare ecosystem, helping you make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like