The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 39439, Heidelberg, Mississippi is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.89 percent of the residents in 39439 has some form of health insurance. 42.22 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.30 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39439 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,331 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39439. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 653 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,002 health care providers accessible to residents in 39439, Heidelberg, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39439, Heidelberg, Mississippi
Lung Cancer Score | 37 |
---|---|
People Score | 65 |
Provider Score | 52 |
Hospital Score | 25 |
Travel Score | 32 |
39439 | Heidelberg | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Heidelberg, MS (ZIP Code 39439)
This analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 39439 (Heidelberg, Mississippi) and the surrounding area, focusing on primary care access and related resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Lung Cancer Score' evaluation, considering factors critical to early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. While a numerical score is not provided, the following discussion offers a qualitative ranking based on the availability of key elements.
Heidelberg, a small town, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The primary hurdle is likely access to primary care physicians, the crucial gatekeepers for lung cancer screening and early intervention. A low physician-to-patient ratio suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments and establishing a consistent relationship with a primary care provider. This is the foundational element upon which the entire Lung Cancer Score rests. A scarcity of primary care will significantly diminish access to preventative care, including lung cancer screenings, and will hinder the rapid referral to specialists if a suspicious finding is detected.
The availability of primary care is directly tied to the overall health of the community. A robust primary care network can promote preventative measures, such as smoking cessation programs, which directly impact lung cancer incidence. Furthermore, primary care physicians are essential in educating patients about risk factors, symptoms, and the importance of early detection. Without sufficient primary care resources, these critical preventative measures are likely to be underutilized.
Beyond the sheer number of physicians, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within the region is critical. These practices may be characterized by a commitment to patient education, proactive screening protocols, and a streamlined referral process to specialists. Researching individual practices, their patient reviews, and their adherence to established guidelines for lung cancer screening and management is crucial. Practices demonstrating a commitment to these areas would receive a higher ranking in this assessment.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in mitigating geographical barriers to healthcare access. For a rural community like Heidelberg, telemedicine offers the potential to connect patients with specialists who may not be readily available locally. This is especially relevant for pulmonologists, oncologists, and radiologists involved in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to educational resources, would receive a higher score. This technology can improve access to specialists, reduce travel burdens, and facilitate timely interventions.
Mental health resources are another critical element. A lung cancer diagnosis is emotionally taxing, and access to mental health support is essential for patients and their families. The availability of counselors, therapists, and support groups specializing in cancer care significantly impacts the overall quality of life for those affected. The lack of such resources would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score. The presence of these resources, integrated with the primary care network, would be a significant positive indicator.
The presence of local hospitals and their capabilities are also important. The availability of advanced imaging technologies, such as low-dose CT scanners for lung cancer screening, directly impacts the ability to detect the disease early. Similarly, the presence of oncologists, pulmonologists, and thoracic surgeons within a reasonable distance is essential for timely diagnosis and treatment. Proximity to comprehensive cancer centers and their resources would also positively influence the Lung Cancer Score.
The overall infrastructure supporting cancer care is essential. This includes access to diagnostic facilities, treatment centers, and supportive care services. The availability of these resources within a reasonable travel distance significantly impacts the patient experience and outcomes. The absence of these services would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score.
Furthermore, the community's awareness and engagement with lung cancer prevention and treatment are essential. The presence of community outreach programs, public health initiatives, and patient advocacy groups can significantly impact the overall health of the population. These programs can raise awareness about risk factors, promote early detection, and provide support to patients and their families.
The availability of smoking cessation programs and resources is crucial. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, and access to effective smoking cessation programs can significantly reduce the risk of developing the disease. The presence of these programs, integrated with the primary care network, would positively influence the Lung Cancer Score.
In conclusion, the Lung Cancer Score for Heidelberg, MS (ZIP Code 39439) is contingent on several factors. The primary consideration is the availability of primary care physicians. Other critical elements include the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, the presence of advanced diagnostic and treatment facilities, and community engagement in lung cancer prevention and treatment. A low physician-to-patient ratio, combined with a lack of specialized services and limited access to telemedicine, would negatively impact the score. Conversely, a robust primary care network, coupled with readily available specialized care and a commitment to patient education and support, would result in a higher score.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital facilities, and access to specialized care, consider exploring interactive maps using CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps can provide a detailed visual representation of the healthcare landscape in and around Heidelberg, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the resources available to patients.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like