27048, Stoneville, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 27048, Stoneville, North Carolina is 25 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.76 percent of the residents in 27048 has some form of health insurance. 39.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27048 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,625 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27048. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,535 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 142 health care providers accessible to residents in 27048, Stoneville, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Stoneville, NC (ZIP Code 27048)

This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for physicians practicing within ZIP code 27048, focusing on factors crucial to early detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being. We will examine primary care availability in Stoneville, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to offer a comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape as it relates to lung cancer care in this specific geographic area.

Stoneville, North Carolina, a small town, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The availability of primary care physicians is a critical foundation for any successful cancer screening and treatment program. Early detection is paramount in lung cancer, and primary care providers are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. A robust primary care network can facilitate timely referrals to specialists, order necessary screenings, and provide ongoing support throughout the patient journey.

Assessing primary care availability involves evaluating the number of practicing physicians within the ZIP code, considering their specialties, and understanding their patient load. Physician-to-patient ratios are a key indicator of access. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater access to care. The specific ratio for 27048 needs to be determined through data analysis, but the impact of this ratio on lung cancer outcomes is undeniable.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care is equally important. Practices that emphasize preventative care, including routine screenings for at-risk individuals (smokers, former smokers, and those with a family history), are more likely to identify lung cancer at earlier, more treatable stages. The adoption of evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for eligible patients, is another critical factor.

Identifying standout practices within 27048 requires examining their performance metrics, patient satisfaction scores, and commitment to patient-centered care. Practices that actively engage in community outreach, educate patients about lung cancer risks and prevention, and collaborate effectively with specialists (oncologists, pulmonologists, radiologists) are likely to deliver superior care. This collaboration is vital for seamless transitions throughout the care continuum.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, especially in rural areas like Stoneville. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access specialists and receive follow-up care remotely. This is particularly valuable for patients undergoing treatment or managing chronic conditions related to lung cancer. The availability of telehealth consultations, remote monitoring, and virtual support groups can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but essential component of comprehensive cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in oncology or are experienced in supporting cancer patients is crucial. Integration of mental health services within primary care practices or through referrals to external providers can significantly improve patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans.

The Lung Cancer Score for 27048 would consider all these factors. It would involve a detailed assessment of the primary care landscape, including physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of evidence-based screening guidelines, the availability of telemedicine services, and the integration of mental health resources. The score would also incorporate data on patient outcomes, such as early detection rates and survival rates, if available.

The analysis would also highlight any gaps in care and identify areas for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is high, recommendations might include strategies to attract more physicians to the area or to improve access through telemedicine. If mental health resources are limited, the analysis might suggest partnerships with local mental health providers or the implementation of telehealth options.

The ultimate goal of this Lung Cancer Score analysis is to provide a clear and concise picture of the healthcare landscape in Stoneville, NC, as it relates to lung cancer care. This information can be used by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to make informed decisions and to improve the quality of care for individuals affected by this disease. The analysis must be data-driven and objective, using reliable sources of information to ensure accuracy and credibility.

The process of compiling this data would involve several steps. First, a comprehensive review of publicly available data, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data, state health department data, and physician directories, would be necessary. Second, direct outreach to local healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, specialists, and hospitals, would be conducted to gather information about their practices, services, and patient outcomes. Third, patient surveys and interviews could be used to gather information about their experiences with the healthcare system.

This comprehensive approach would provide a detailed and accurate assessment of the Lung Cancer Score for 27048. The final report would include a clear explanation of the methodology, the data sources used, and the key findings. It would also include recommendations for improving the quality of care and addressing any identified gaps.

Understanding the specific challenges and opportunities within Stoneville, NC, is crucial for developing effective strategies to combat lung cancer. By focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of evidence-based guidelines, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can create a healthcare environment that supports early detection, effective treatment, and improved patient outcomes.

The information provided in this analysis is a starting point for understanding the healthcare landscape in Stoneville. To gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and the potential impact on lung cancer outcomes, explore the interactive maps available on CartoChrome.