27214, Browns Summit, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 27214, Browns Summit, North Carolina is 61 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.06 percent of the residents in 27214 has some form of health insurance. 32.18 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27214 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,564 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27214. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,082 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,773 health care providers accessible to residents in 27214, Browns Summit, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Browns Summit, NC (ZIP Code 27214)

This analysis assesses the landscape of healthcare resources in Browns Summit, North Carolina (ZIP Code 27214), focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. We'll evaluate the availability and quality of primary care, the presence of specialists, and the integration of technologies like telemedicine, ultimately assigning a hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score" reflecting the community's preparedness to address this serious disease. This score isn't a numerical value but rather a qualitative assessment based on the factors discussed.

**Primary Care Landscape and Physician-to-Patient Ratio:**

The foundation of effective lung cancer care lies in accessible and high-quality primary care. Early detection through regular screenings and prompt referrals are crucial. In Browns Summit, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and the physician-to-patient ratio are critical indicators. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau can be utilized to estimate this ratio. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of PCPs relative to the population, would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score. This can lead to delayed appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially missed opportunities for early detection.

Browns Summit, being a relatively small community, might face challenges in this area. The presence of larger healthcare systems in nearby cities like Greensboro and Reidsville could provide some relief, as residents may seek care outside of their immediate ZIP code. However, the convenience and accessibility of local primary care remain paramount. Analyzing the types of practices available – solo practices, group practices, or those affiliated with larger hospital networks – is also important. Practices affiliated with larger networks often have better resources and referral pathways, potentially improving the Lung Cancer Score.

**Specialist Availability and Referral Networks:**

Beyond primary care, the availability of specialists, particularly pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, is vital. Lung cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. The presence of these specialists within a reasonable driving distance is a significant factor. If specialists are readily available, the Lung Cancer Score would be higher. Conversely, a reliance on referrals to distant cities would negatively impact the score, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment.

The strength of referral networks is also critical. Do local PCPs have established relationships with specialists? Are there clear pathways for timely referrals? Efficient communication and collaboration between primary care and specialist physicians are essential for seamless patient care. The presence of a local hospital or medical center with a dedicated oncology department would significantly boost the Lung Cancer Score. This would provide a centralized location for diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care.

**Standout Practices and Their Impact:**

Identifying standout practices within the Browns Summit area is crucial. These practices may demonstrate exemplary performance in areas like patient education, proactive screening programs, and adherence to national guidelines for lung cancer care. Practices that actively promote smoking cessation programs and provide comprehensive support to patients are particularly valuable. Their commitment to preventative care and patient well-being would positively influence the Lung Cancer Score.

To identify these standout practices, we would need to analyze publicly available data such as patient reviews, quality metrics (if available), and information about the practice's commitment to community outreach and education. Practices that actively engage in these activities would be recognized for their contributions to improving the overall Lung Cancer Score.

**Telemedicine Adoption and Its Role:**

Telemedicine has become increasingly important in healthcare, particularly in rural or underserved areas. The adoption of telemedicine by local practices can significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, follow-up appointments, and access to specialists who may not be physically located in Browns Summit.

The availability of telemedicine services for lung cancer patients can improve access to care, reduce travel burdens, and facilitate more frequent monitoring. Practices that offer telehealth options for both primary care and specialist consultations would receive a higher score. The integration of telehealth into the healthcare system demonstrates a commitment to innovation and patient convenience.

**Mental Health Resources and Patient Support:**

Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be incredibly stressful. The availability of mental health resources and patient support services is a crucial component of comprehensive care. This includes access to therapists, support groups, and resources for managing the emotional and psychological challenges associated with the disease.

Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their patients, either through in-house services or by providing referrals to mental health professionals, would receive a higher score. The presence of support groups specifically for lung cancer patients and their families is also a positive indicator. This component is often overlooked but is critical for patient well-being and overall quality of life.

**Overall Assessment and Hypothetical Lung Cancer Score:**

Based on the factors discussed, the Lung Cancer Score for Browns Summit (ZIP Code 27214) would be determined. This score isn't a numerical value but rather a qualitative assessment. For example, a score could be categorized as "Good," "Fair," or "Needs Improvement."

If the community demonstrates a strong primary care foundation, adequate specialist availability, robust telemedicine adoption, and comprehensive mental health resources, the score would be higher. Conversely, if there are shortages of PCPs, limited access to specialists, and a lack of support services, the score would be lower, highlighting areas for improvement.

**Leveraging CartoChrome Maps for Enhanced Understanding:**

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Browns Summit and surrounding areas, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps allow you to visualize and analyze geographic data related to healthcare resources. You can map the locations of primary care practices, specialists, hospitals, and support services. This visual representation can help identify gaps in care, assess accessibility, and inform strategic planning for improving lung cancer care in the community. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful tool for understanding the complex interplay of factors that influence the Lung Cancer Score and ultimately, patient outcomes.