27301, Mc Leansville, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 27301, Mc Leansville, North Carolina is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.37 percent of the residents in 27301 has some form of health insurance. 25.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27301 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,958 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27301. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,680 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,562 health care providers accessible to residents in 27301, Mc Leansville, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: 27301 & Primary Care in Mc Leansville

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 27301, encompassing Mc Leansville, North Carolina, requires a nuanced approach. Our focus is on the availability and quality of primary care, particularly in relation to lung cancer screening and support services. We’ll assess the current situation, considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources, ultimately formulating a "Lung Cancer Score" assessment.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on accessible and responsive primary care. Early detection through screening is crucial, and primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact. In Mc Leansville, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses. While precise figures fluctuate, the overall picture within 27301 suggests a potential strain on primary care resources. This necessitates a deeper dive into the practices themselves.

Evaluating individual practices is essential. Factors such as the types of services offered, the experience of the physicians, and the availability of specialized equipment contribute to a practice's suitability for lung cancer care. Practices that actively promote and facilitate lung cancer screening, including low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for eligible patients, receive higher marks. The presence of on-site diagnostic capabilities, such as X-ray machines, further enhances accessibility. Additionally, the availability of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability with other healthcare providers are crucial for seamless information sharing and coordinated care.

Telemedicine has emerged as a significant force in healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas like Mc Leansville. Its adoption can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who face geographical barriers or mobility limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals are better positioned to provide comprehensive care. Telemedicine's role in lung cancer care extends beyond initial consultations; it can facilitate follow-up appointments, medication management, and even support group participation. The degree of telemedicine integration will directly impact the Lung Cancer Score.

Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally taxing. Therefore, access to mental health resources is a vital component of comprehensive care. Practices that have established partnerships with mental health professionals, offer on-site counseling services, or provide referrals to qualified therapists receive higher scores. The ability to address the psychological and emotional needs of patients, including anxiety, depression, and grief, is integral to their overall well-being and treatment adherence. This aspect is a critical consideration in our Lung Cancer Score assessment.

Standout practices within 27301 will be those that demonstrate a commitment to excellence in these areas. These practices are likely to have a well-defined lung cancer screening program, utilizing evidence-based guidelines and actively reaching out to eligible patients. They will likely have a physician-to-patient ratio that allows for adequate time spent with each patient. They will have a strong telemedicine presence, offering convenient and accessible care options. Furthermore, they will prioritize the mental health needs of their patients, providing or facilitating access to comprehensive support services. Identifying these standout practices is a key objective of this analysis.

The absence of specific, publicly available data on individual practices and physician-to-patient ratios necessitates a more general assessment. However, based on publicly available information, the overall Lung Cancer Score for primary care within 27301 is likely moderate. The potential for improvement exists, particularly in expanding telemedicine adoption, strengthening mental health support, and increasing the proactive promotion of lung cancer screening. The score is also influenced by the demographics of the area. An older population, or a population with a higher prevalence of smoking, would warrant a greater emphasis on screening and early detection.

The factors described above are weighted to produce a final Lung Cancer Score. The physician-to-patient ratio accounts for a significant portion of the score, reflecting the fundamental importance of access to care. Practice characteristics, including screening programs, diagnostic capabilities, and EHR interoperability, are also heavily weighted. Telemedicine adoption and mental health resources contribute to the overall score, reflecting the importance of holistic care. Each factor is assessed using available data and public information.

The analysis also needs to consider the broader healthcare ecosystem. The availability of specialized services, such as pulmonologists, oncologists, and radiation therapists, in the surrounding areas is crucial. Easy access to these specialists is vital for patients who require advanced care. The proximity to hospitals and cancer centers, as well as the availability of support groups and patient education resources, also contribute to the overall quality of care.

The Lung Cancer Score, while a useful metric, is not a definitive measure of healthcare quality. It is a composite score that reflects the availability and quality of primary care resources in relation to lung cancer care. It serves as a starting point for further investigation and improvement. The score can be used to identify areas for improvement and to inform decision-making regarding healthcare access and delivery.

In conclusion, understanding the healthcare landscape within 27301 requires a multifaceted approach. The Lung Cancer Score, based on the factors discussed, provides a valuable assessment of the current situation. It highlights areas of strength and weakness, informing efforts to improve access to care and enhance the quality of life for residents of Mc Leansville.

For a more detailed and visually informative analysis of healthcare resources in 27301 and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to specialized services, we encourage you to explore the power of **CartoChrome maps**. They provide interactive visualizations, allowing you to explore the data and make informed decisions.