27520, Clayton, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 27520, Clayton, North Carolina is 42 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.56 percent of the residents in 27520 has some form of health insurance. 29.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.55 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27520 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 11,283 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 6 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27520. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,709 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,536 health care providers accessible to residents in 27520, Clayton, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Clayton, NC (ZIP Code 27520)

This analysis provides a nuanced assessment of healthcare resources within ZIP code 27520 (Clayton, NC), focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. The goal is to evaluate the preparedness of the local healthcare landscape to address the challenges posed by this serious disease. We will consider physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of mental health resources, ultimately providing a composite "Lung Cancer Score" for the area.

**Physician-to-Patient Ratio and Primary Care Availability:**

A crucial element of early lung cancer detection is access to primary care physicians (PCPs). Regular checkups and screenings are essential for identifying potential problems. The physician-to-patient ratio in Clayton is a critical indicator. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of PCPs, can lead to delayed diagnoses and reduced opportunities for preventative care. Researching the exact ratio for 27520 requires accessing data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau. However, we can infer some aspects. The rapid population growth in Clayton suggests that demand for PCPs may be outpacing supply. This potential strain on resources underscores the importance of evaluating the current capacity and future planning for healthcare infrastructure.

Primary care availability extends beyond the raw number of physicians. It encompasses factors like appointment wait times, insurance acceptance, and the geographic distribution of practices. Longer wait times and limited insurance options can create barriers to care, particularly for individuals at higher risk for lung cancer, such as smokers and those with a family history of the disease. A comprehensive assessment would involve surveying local practices to determine their patient load, appointment scheduling practices, and the types of insurance they accept.

**Standout Practices and Their Impact:**

Identifying standout practices within Clayton requires examining their approach to lung cancer care. This includes their commitment to early detection through screening programs, their use of advanced diagnostic tools, and their collaboration with specialists. Practices that actively promote lung cancer screening, such as low-dose CT scans for eligible patients, are highly valued. The presence of on-site radiology services and access to specialized pulmonologists and oncologists are also vital.

Furthermore, the quality of care extends beyond medical expertise. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer support groups, and provide resources for smoking cessation are crucial for improving patient outcomes. The integration of patient navigators, who guide patients through the complex healthcare system, is another positive indicator. Identifying these practices and highlighting their best practices can inform patients and promote improvements across the healthcare landscape.

**Telemedicine Adoption and its Implications:**

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for expanding access to healthcare, particularly in areas with limited resources. Its adoption in Clayton is a key factor in our Lung Cancer Score analysis. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations with PCPs, specialists, and mental health professionals, reducing the need for travel and improving convenience.

The availability of telemedicine options for lung cancer-related services, such as follow-up appointments, medication management, and counseling, is particularly important. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially reach a wider patient population and provide more timely care. Evaluating the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of use of the platforms, and the availability of technical support are essential aspects of this analysis.

**Mental Health Resources: A Critical Component:**

Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's mental health. Anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges are common. The availability of mental health resources within Clayton is therefore a critical component of our Lung Cancer Score.

This includes assessing the number of mental health providers, their specialties, and their capacity to serve patients with cancer. Access to individual therapy, group support, and psychiatric services is crucial. The integration of mental health services within primary care practices and oncology clinics is a positive indicator. Furthermore, the availability of support groups specifically for lung cancer patients and their families can provide invaluable emotional support and coping strategies.

**The Lung Cancer Score: A Composite View:**

Based on the factors discussed above, a composite "Lung Cancer Score" can be developed for Clayton. This score would reflect the overall preparedness of the healthcare system to address the challenges of lung cancer. The score would be based on a weighted assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.

The score would not be a single number, but rather a multi-faceted evaluation. It would highlight strengths and weaknesses within the healthcare system, providing insights for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. The score could be used to identify areas for improvement, such as increasing the number of PCPs, expanding access to lung cancer screening, or enhancing mental health services.

**Conclusion:**

Evaluating the healthcare landscape in Clayton, NC (27520) requires a comprehensive understanding of the resources available for lung cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. The physician-to-patient ratio, primary care availability, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources are all critical factors. A thorough analysis of these factors can provide valuable insights into the preparedness of the local healthcare system to address the challenges of lung cancer.

**Take Action with CartoChrome Maps:**

Want to visualize the healthcare landscape in Clayton and surrounding areas? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of physician locations, healthcare facility distribution, and demographic data. CartoChrome maps can help you identify areas with limited access to care and visualize the impact of various healthcare initiatives. **Visit CartoChrome today to explore the maps and gain valuable insights into the healthcare resources available in your community.**