27842, Henrico, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 27842, Henrico, North Carolina is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.73 percent of the residents in 27842 has some form of health insurance. 45.64 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.80 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27842 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 219 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27842. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 643 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 398 health care providers accessible to residents in 27842, Henrico, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: 27842 & Henrico Primary Care

This analysis examines the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 27842 and the broader context of primary care availability in Henrico, Virginia, with a focus on factors impacting a hypothetical "Lung Cancer Score." This score, while not a formal metric, reflects the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of care available to individuals at risk or diagnosed with lung cancer. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment.

ZIP code 27842, likely in North Carolina, requires a localized assessment. Information on physician density and specialty availability is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the North Carolina Medical Board would be essential to gauge the number of primary care physicians, pulmonologists, oncologists, and radiologists practicing within the area. A low physician-to-patient ratio, especially for specialists, would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. Conversely, a high ratio, indicating greater accessibility, would positively influence the score.

Henrico, Virginia, presents a different perspective. As a more populated area, it likely boasts a more robust healthcare infrastructure. However, primary care access is paramount. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts early detection and preventative care, both crucial for lung cancer. A high PCP-to-patient ratio in Henrico would suggest better opportunities for regular screenings, such as low-dose CT scans, which are vital for identifying lung cancer at its earliest, most treatable stages.

Standout practices within 27842 and Henrico, if identifiable through publicly available data or patient reviews, would significantly affect the Lung Cancer Score. Practices with a demonstrated commitment to lung cancer screening, advanced diagnostic capabilities (e.g., bronchoscopy suites), and multidisciplinary care teams (including pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists) would contribute positively. Practices actively participating in clinical trials or offering innovative treatment options would further elevate their contribution.

Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor. The ability to remotely consult with specialists, receive follow-up care, and participate in support groups can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations. Practices in both 27842 and Henrico that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, would receive a higher score. This is especially relevant for patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation, who may benefit from the convenience and reduced travel burden of telemedicine.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical to the Lung Cancer Score. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating. Patients may experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to qualified mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The availability of support groups, both in-person and virtual, is also a positive indicator.

Specific examples within 27842 are difficult to provide without access to localized data. However, imagine a practice in 27842 that actively promotes lung cancer screening, utilizes advanced diagnostic tools, and offers telemedicine consultations. This practice would contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score for the area. Conversely, a lack of specialists, limited access to screening, and no mental health support would negatively impact the score.

In Henrico, a practice known for its patient-centered approach, offering comprehensive lung cancer care, including access to clinical trials and a robust telemedicine program, would significantly boost the Lung Cancer Score for the region. The presence of a dedicated oncology center, offering radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgical services, would further enhance the score.

The availability of ancillary services, such as smoking cessation programs, also plays a role. These programs can help prevent lung cancer by reducing smoking rates and supporting individuals who are trying to quit. Practices that offer or partner with organizations providing smoking cessation services would receive a higher score.

The quality of communication and patient education is also a key factor. Practices that provide clear and concise information about lung cancer, treatment options, and potential side effects, and that actively involve patients in their care decisions, contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. This includes providing educational materials, offering support groups, and ensuring patients have access to their medical records.

The overall infrastructure of the healthcare system in both areas is important. The presence of well-equipped hospitals, specialized cancer centers, and access to advanced imaging technologies, such as PET scans, directly impacts the Lung Cancer Score. The availability of these resources ensures that patients have access to the most advanced diagnostic and treatment options.

The presence of a robust referral network is also critical. Practices that can easily refer patients to specialists, such as pulmonologists, oncologists, and surgeons, and that coordinate care effectively, contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. This ensures that patients receive timely and appropriate care from a multidisciplinary team.

The Lung Cancer Score is a dynamic measure, influenced by numerous factors. Regular updates and assessments are necessary to accurately reflect the evolving healthcare landscape. The factors discussed above, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and ancillary services, all contribute to the overall score.

To visualize the healthcare landscape and gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing the Lung Cancer Score in 27842 and Henrico, consider using **CartoChrome maps**. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of physician density, practice locations, and other relevant data, allowing for a more comprehensive analysis of the healthcare environment. Explore the possibilities with CartoChrome maps to gain valuable insights and improve healthcare decision-making.