28021, Cherryville, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28021, Cherryville, North Carolina is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.76 percent of the residents in 28021 has some form of health insurance. 36.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28021 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,279 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 15 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28021. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,507 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,636 health care providers accessible to residents in 28021, Cherryville, North Carolina.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28021 & Primary Care Availability in Cherryville**

Analyzing the landscape of healthcare, particularly concerning lung cancer care and primary care access, requires a nuanced approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP code 28021, encompassing Cherryville, North Carolina, to assess the availability of physicians, the quality of care, and the resources available to patients facing a lung cancer diagnosis. The aim is to provide a "Lung Cancer Score" analysis, considering various factors that contribute to the overall health and well-being of the community.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. In Cherryville (28021), the ratio of primary care physicians to the population is a crucial starting point. A low ratio can indicate potential challenges in securing timely appointments and consistent care. This can be especially problematic for individuals suspected of having lung cancer, as early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential for improved outcomes. Data from state health departments and national databases like the American Medical Association (AMA) can provide insights into these ratios.

Standout practices within the area warrant specific attention. These are healthcare providers that demonstrate excellence in patient care, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment outcomes. Identifying these practices requires a multi-faceted approach. Patient reviews, physician referrals, and data on cancer survival rates can all be considered. Practices that offer comprehensive cancer care, including screening programs, advanced diagnostic imaging, and access to specialized oncologists, should be highlighted.

Telemedicine adoption is another significant factor. The ability to access healthcare services remotely, through video consultations and remote monitoring, can be particularly beneficial for patients living in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine can improve access to specialists, provide convenient follow-up appointments, and offer support for patients managing their conditions. The availability of telemedicine services within the practices in 28021 should be evaluated, noting the types of services offered and the ease of access.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical aspect of cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, within the healthcare system is essential. Practices that offer integrated mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers are better positioned to support patients' overall well-being.

The analysis of lung cancer care must also consider the availability of specialized services. This includes access to pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. The presence of these specialists within the community or within a reasonable travel distance is crucial for providing comprehensive care. The availability of advanced diagnostic tools, such as CT scans, PET scans, and bronchoscopy, is also essential for accurate diagnosis and staging of lung cancer.

Furthermore, the analysis must consider the availability of support services. These include patient navigators, support groups, and educational resources. Patient navigators can help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, coordinate appointments, and provide emotional support. Support groups offer a safe space for patients to share their experiences and connect with others facing similar challenges. Educational resources can empower patients to make informed decisions about their care.

The quality of care is another important consideration. This involves evaluating the adherence to evidence-based guidelines, the use of advanced treatment options, and the overall patient experience. Data on cancer survival rates, treatment outcomes, and patient satisfaction can provide valuable insights into the quality of care. Practices that participate in quality improvement initiatives and are committed to providing patient-centered care should be recognized.

When evaluating the "Lung Cancer Score," it is important to consider the disparities in healthcare access. Factors such as socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity can significantly impact a patient's ability to access quality care. The analysis should consider the healthcare needs of all residents in 28021, regardless of their background.

The analysis should also include an assessment of the healthcare infrastructure. This includes the availability of hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities. The proximity of these facilities to the residents of 28021 is a crucial factor in determining healthcare accessibility. The availability of transportation options, such as public transportation and ride-sharing services, should also be considered.

The role of community partnerships is also important. Healthcare providers often collaborate with community organizations to provide support services and educational programs. These partnerships can enhance the overall quality of care and improve patient outcomes. The analysis should identify the community partnerships that exist within 28021 and assess their impact on healthcare access.

In conclusion, assessing the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 28021 for lung cancer care and primary care availability requires a comprehensive evaluation. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, specialized services, support services, quality of care, healthcare disparities, healthcare infrastructure, and community partnerships. This comprehensive approach is essential to providing a meaningful "Lung Cancer Score" analysis that can inform patients, providers, and policymakers alike. This information can be used to identify areas for improvement and to promote better health outcomes for the residents of Cherryville.

For a more detailed, visually-driven understanding of the healthcare landscape in Cherryville, North Carolina, and the surrounding areas, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their mapping solutions provide a dynamic and insightful view of healthcare access, physician locations, and resource availability.