28349, Kenansville, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28349, Kenansville, North Carolina is 6 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 76.94 percent of the residents in 28349 has some form of health insurance. 44.64 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 46.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28349 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 846 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28349. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 533 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,138 health care providers accessible to residents in 28349, Kenansville, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28349 and Kenansville Primary Care

Analyzing the landscape of lung cancer care in ZIP code 28349 and the availability of primary care in Kenansville requires a multifaceted approach. We will delve into the factors influencing patient outcomes, including physician accessibility, technological adoption, and the integration of mental health support. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within these communities, ultimately informing strategies to improve patient care.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on early detection and prompt intervention. This necessitates a robust primary care infrastructure. In Kenansville, evaluating primary care availability involves assessing the number of practicing physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants per capita. This physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments for routine checkups, crucial for identifying early signs of lung cancer. Conversely, a high ratio signifies greater accessibility, potentially leading to earlier diagnoses and improved survival rates. The analysis must also consider the distribution of these healthcare providers across the geographic area, ensuring equitable access for all residents.

Furthermore, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening, particularly for high-risk individuals (smokers and former smokers). Practices that actively promote and facilitate lung cancer screening, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans, demonstrate a proactive approach to patient care. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability across different healthcare settings is also vital. This allows for seamless information sharing between primary care physicians, specialists, and hospitals, ensuring coordinated care and preventing potential delays in treatment.

Within ZIP code 28349, the availability of specialists, particularly pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, directly impacts the quality of lung cancer treatment. The concentration of these specialists within the area is a significant factor. A higher concentration suggests greater access to specialized expertise and advanced treatment options. However, it is essential to consider the capacity of these specialists to handle the patient volume. Long wait times for appointments can negatively impact patient outcomes.

Examining the practices within the area reveals standout performers. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive care, integrating various services to meet patient needs. They may have dedicated lung cancer screening programs, support groups, and patient navigators who guide patients through the complexities of diagnosis and treatment. They may also actively participate in clinical trials, offering patients access to cutting-edge therapies. Identifying and highlighting these exemplary practices can serve as a model for other healthcare providers, fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element in the evaluation. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The availability of telemedicine services for both primary care and specialist consultations can reduce travel time and associated costs, improving patient convenience and adherence to treatment plans. Moreover, telemedicine can facilitate remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment, allowing healthcare providers to detect and manage potential complications promptly.

The integration of mental health resources into lung cancer care is often overlooked, yet it is essential. A lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and fear are common experiences. Practices that recognize and address these needs by providing access to mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. This integrated approach can improve patient coping mechanisms, enhance treatment adherence, and ultimately improve quality of life.

The analysis must also consider the socioeconomic factors that influence access to care. These include insurance coverage, transportation availability, and health literacy. Individuals with limited access to resources may face significant barriers to receiving timely diagnosis and treatment. Healthcare providers should be aware of these disparities and actively work to address them, for example, by offering financial assistance, providing transportation support, and ensuring that patient education materials are available in multiple languages and at an appropriate literacy level.

Finally, the analysis should evaluate the overall healthcare infrastructure within the region. This includes the availability of hospitals, diagnostic imaging centers, and radiation oncology facilities. The proximity of these facilities to patients and their capacity to handle the patient volume are critical factors. The quality of care provided at these facilities, as measured by patient outcomes, infection rates, and patient satisfaction, should also be considered.

By carefully examining these factors, a comprehensive Lung Cancer Score can be developed for ZIP code 28349 and the primary care landscape in Kenansville. This score can serve as a valuable tool for healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients, identifying areas of strength and weakness and informing strategies to improve lung cancer care and overall health outcomes. It can also be used to track progress over time, allowing for continuous improvement and adaptation to evolving healthcare needs.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 28349 and Kenansville, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and resource availability, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a detailed and dynamic view of the healthcare infrastructure, allowing you to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities in these communities.