The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.70 percent of the residents in 28393 has some form of health insurance. 52.96 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.06 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28393 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 431 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28393. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 556 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,056 health care providers accessible to residents in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina
Lung Cancer Score | 38 |
---|---|
People Score | 54 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 66 |
Travel Score | 37 |
28393 | Turkey | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28393 & Primary Care Availability in Turkey**
This analysis evaluates the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 28393 (primarily serving Spring Lake, North Carolina) and assesses the broader context of primary care availability in Turkey, indirectly impacting early detection and treatment of lung cancer. The “Lung Cancer Score” is a composite, considering factors like physician access, resource availability, and integration of supportive services. The score isn't a simple number; it's a nuanced assessment reflecting the complexities of healthcare delivery.
**ZIP Code 28393: A Local Perspective**
The physician-to-patient ratio in 28393 is a crucial starting point. Determining the precise ratio requires accessing publicly available data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or similar sources. A low ratio (fewer physicians per capita) suggests potential barriers to timely access to primary care and specialist consultations, which are critical for lung cancer screening and diagnosis. This access is particularly important given the potential for delays in diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer.
The availability of specialists, especially pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, is another critical element. The presence of these specialists within the ZIP code or in close proximity significantly impacts the quality of care. A lack of specialists necessitates travel, which can be a burden for patients, particularly those with mobility issues or limited financial resources. Furthermore, the presence of a comprehensive cancer center, with multidisciplinary teams, advanced imaging capabilities (like low-dose CT scans for screening), and access to clinical trials, significantly elevates the score.
Standout practices within 28393 should be identified. These are practices that demonstrate excellence in lung cancer care, perhaps through innovative screening programs, patient-centered care models, or high patient satisfaction scores. Examining online reviews, patient testimonials, and publicly available data on quality metrics can help identify these exemplary practices. These practices are the benchmark for quality care.
Telemedicine adoption is a vital component of the Lung Cancer Score. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and follow-up appointments can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations. Telemedicine can facilitate timely communication between patients and their care teams, helping to manage symptoms and side effects. The degree to which practices in 28393 embrace telemedicine, including the availability of telehealth platforms and the integration of remote monitoring devices, influences the score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in cancer care, but they are essential. Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging. Access to mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services is critical for patients' well-being. The Lung Cancer Score considers the availability of these resources within the community or through partnerships with local organizations.
**Primary Care Availability in Turkey: A Broader View**
Primary care availability in Turkey has a significant, though indirect, impact on lung cancer outcomes. Primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. Their ability to recognize early signs of lung cancer, order appropriate diagnostic tests, and refer patients to specialists is paramount.
Physician distribution across Turkey is a key factor. Rural areas may face shortages of primary care physicians, leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. The Lung Cancer Score considers the geographic distribution of physicians and the accessibility of primary care services for all segments of the population.
The Turkish healthcare system's structure and funding models influence access to primary care. Universal health coverage, if effectively implemented, can remove financial barriers to accessing care. The availability of insurance coverage and the affordability of healthcare services are essential for ensuring that all citizens can receive timely screening and treatment.
Screening programs for lung cancer are crucial for early detection. The Lung Cancer Score evaluates the existence and effectiveness of national or regional screening programs. These programs, often involving low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals, can significantly improve survival rates. The availability of screening programs, coupled with public awareness campaigns, can lead to earlier diagnoses and better outcomes.
The integration of technology in primary care is another important consideration. Electronic health records (EHRs) can facilitate information sharing between primary care physicians and specialists. Telemedicine can extend the reach of primary care services, particularly in underserved areas. The adoption of these technologies can improve efficiency and coordination of care.
Mental health resources in Turkey are also relevant. The availability of mental health support for patients with lung cancer is essential. The Lung Cancer Score considers the availability of mental health services within the healthcare system and the level of integration with cancer care.
**Conclusion**
Evaluating the Lung Cancer Score requires a multifaceted approach. The specifics of physician-to-patient ratios, specialist availability, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources within ZIP Code 28393 and the broader primary care landscape in Turkey are vital. This analysis highlights the complexities of healthcare delivery and the importance of access, resources, and supportive services in improving lung cancer outcomes.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and other relevant factors, consider using CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping capabilities can provide a valuable visual representation of the data, enhancing understanding and facilitating informed decision-making.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like