28518, Beulaville, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28518, Beulaville, North Carolina is 5 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 83.17 percent of the residents in 28518 has some form of health insurance. 45.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.59 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28518 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,898 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28518. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,451 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 280 health care providers accessible to residents in 28518, Beulaville, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28518 & Beulaville Primary Care

Analyzing healthcare resources within ZIP code 28518, encompassing the town of Beulaville, North Carolina, requires a multi-faceted approach, especially when considering the critical area of lung cancer care. This analysis will assess the availability and quality of primary care, a crucial entry point for early detection and management of this disease, and subsequently evaluate the overall "Lung Cancer Score" for the region. The score is not a single number but rather a composite of factors impacting patient access, quality of care, and support services.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care begins with accessible and competent primary care physicians (PCPs). In Beulaville, primary care availability is a significant determinant of the Lung Cancer Score. A low PCP-to-patient ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments, preventative screenings, and initial diagnostic evaluations. The ideal scenario is a PCP readily available to address patient concerns, especially those related to respiratory health and potential lung cancer symptoms. The density of primary care physicians in the area, along with their individual patient loads, significantly influences the overall score.

Standout practices within the region, if any, would be those demonstrating a proactive approach to lung cancer screening and early detection. This includes the implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for high-risk individuals, as recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Practices that actively identify and engage patients who meet the criteria for LDCT screening, such as those with a history of heavy smoking, contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. Their commitment to preventative care and early intervention is vital.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. The ability to access virtual consultations with PCPs and specialists, particularly pulmonologists and oncologists, can significantly enhance the Lung Cancer Score. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, especially in rural areas like Beulaville, offering patients access to expert opinions and follow-up care without requiring extensive travel. Practices that embrace telemedicine, providing virtual appointments, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, are positioned to improve patient outcomes and increase the overall score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are integral to a comprehensive Lung Cancer Score. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health support services, such as counseling, therapy, and support groups, is essential. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referral services into their care models contribute significantly to a higher score. Collaboration between primary care physicians, oncologists, and mental health professionals is vital for providing holistic care.

The quality of diagnostic services also impacts the Lung Cancer Score. The availability of advanced imaging technologies, such as CT scans and PET scans, is crucial for accurate diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Timely access to these diagnostic tools can significantly impact treatment outcomes. The presence of a well-equipped radiology department within a reasonable distance is a positive factor. Furthermore, the expertise of radiologists in interpreting these images is also important.

Specialist availability, particularly pulmonologists and oncologists, directly influences the Lung Cancer Score. The proximity of these specialists, their patient load, and their acceptance of new patients are key considerations. A shortage of specialists can lead to delayed diagnoses, treatment initiation, and overall poorer patient outcomes. The ability of patients to access timely consultations with these specialists is a critical component of the score.

The presence of comprehensive cancer centers, even if located outside of the immediate ZIP code, can positively impact the score. These centers often offer multidisciplinary care, including medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, and supportive services. The ability of patients to access these centers for treatment, clinical trials, and supportive care is essential.

The Lung Cancer Score is also influenced by patient education and support programs. Practices that provide educational materials about lung cancer risk factors, symptoms, and screening options contribute to a higher score. Support groups, patient navigators, and resources for smoking cessation are also valuable components. Empowering patients with knowledge and support can improve their ability to advocate for their health and navigate the complexities of cancer care.

The impact of insurance coverage on the Lung Cancer Score is also a factor. The accessibility of affordable health insurance, including coverage for preventative screenings, diagnostic tests, and cancer treatments, is crucial. Practices that assist patients in navigating insurance options and financial assistance programs contribute to a higher score.

Finally, the overall quality of care is a key element. This is reflected in patient satisfaction, treatment outcomes, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Practices that consistently demonstrate high-quality care, as measured by patient surveys, clinical outcomes data, and adherence to national standards, contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score. This also includes access to clinical trials and cutting-edge therapies.

In conclusion, evaluating the Lung Cancer Score for ZIP code 28518 and Beulaville requires a holistic assessment. It is not merely a matter of counting doctors but also assessing the quality of care, the availability of resources, and the integration of supportive services. The score is a dynamic measure, reflecting the evolving healthcare landscape and the commitment of healthcare providers to improving patient outcomes.

If you'd like a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, specialist availability, and proximity to cancer centers, then explore the power of geographic analysis.
**Visit CartoChrome maps for detailed visualizations of healthcare resources in your area.**