28524, Davis, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28524, Davis, North Carolina is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 28524 has some form of health insurance. 22.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 96.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28524 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 67 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28524. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 58 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,067 health care providers accessible to residents in 28524, Davis, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28524 & Primary Care in Davis

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning lung cancer care, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis examines the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 28524, encompassing the town of Davis, with a focus on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This information contributes to a "Lung Cancer Score" reflecting the overall support system available to patients facing this challenging disease.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on accessible and robust primary care. Early detection and timely referrals are critical for improved patient outcomes. In Davis, the availability of primary care physicians directly impacts the initial screening rates and the speed with which patients receive specialized care. A higher concentration of primary care providers, coupled with shorter wait times for appointments, contributes positively to the Lung Cancer Score. Conversely, shortages in primary care, or extended wait times, negatively impact the score, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial metric. A favorable ratio, indicating a higher number of physicians per capita, suggests greater access to care and potentially shorter wait times. Examining the physician density within 28524, specifically focusing on primary care, pulmonology, and oncology specialists, provides a clear picture of the available resources. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for specialists involved in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, will significantly lower the Lung Cancer Score, indicating potential challenges in accessing timely and specialized care. Conversely, a higher ratio, indicating more readily available specialists, will elevate the score, reflecting a more supportive environment for patients.

Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is vital. These practices often serve as models for best practices in patient care. Analyzing the practices' approach to lung cancer screening, their use of advanced diagnostic tools, and their referral pathways to specialists is crucial. Practices that actively promote screening, employ evidence-based treatment protocols, and facilitate seamless communication between primary care and specialists will receive higher marks. Their commitment to patient education, support groups, and integration of mental health services further enhances their standing and contributes to a higher Lung Cancer Score.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, provide remote monitoring, and offer follow-up appointments via telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, offering both synchronous and asynchronous communication options, will receive higher marks. The availability of telehealth services, particularly for follow-up appointments and consultations with specialists, will positively impact the Lung Cancer Score, reflecting improved patient convenience and access to care.

The integration of mental health resources is an essential component of comprehensive lung cancer care. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer can be emotionally and psychologically challenging for patients and their families. Practices that recognize the importance of mental health and offer access to counseling, support groups, and psychiatric services will be viewed more favorably. The presence of on-site mental health professionals, or readily available referral networks, will significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score, demonstrating a commitment to holistic patient care. The lack of mental health support will negatively impact the score, highlighting a critical gap in the care continuum.

The analysis of these factors provides a comprehensive Lung Cancer Score for the healthcare environment within ZIP code 28524. The score is not a static number, but rather a dynamic reflection of the availability, accessibility, and quality of care. The score is influenced by the density of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratios for specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the overall commitment of healthcare providers to evidence-based practices and patient-centered care.

The analysis considers several potential challenges. The rural nature of Davis may present challenges regarding physician recruitment and retention. The availability of specialized equipment for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, such as advanced imaging technology and radiation therapy facilities, will also be considered. The transportation infrastructure and its impact on patient access to care will also be assessed. Furthermore, the insurance landscape and its influence on patient access to care, including coverage for screening, diagnostic tests, and treatment, will be considered.

The goal is to identify areas of strength and weakness within the healthcare system in 28524. The findings will inform recommendations for improvement, such as strategies to increase physician recruitment, promote telemedicine adoption, enhance mental health services, and improve patient access to care. The Lung Cancer Score, therefore, serves as a valuable tool for healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients, providing a clear understanding of the healthcare landscape and highlighting areas where improvements can be made to enhance patient outcomes.

This analysis, however, is limited by the available data. Publicly available information, such as physician directories and hospital websites, is used. Data from insurance providers, patient surveys, and practice-specific details are not readily accessible. Therefore, the Lung Cancer Score is an estimation based on available information.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in 28524 and visualize the data discussed, we encourage you to utilize CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that allow for a more in-depth analysis of healthcare resources, physician distribution, and access to care within the region. Explore the interactive maps and discover the specific data points that are most important to you.