28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina is 30 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.91 percent of the residents in 28652 has some form of health insurance. 22.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28652 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 37 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28652. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,166 health care providers accessible to residents in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: 28652 & Minneapolis

This analysis provides a "Lung Cancer Score" assessment, though it's important to clarify that a single, definitive score doesn't exist. Instead, we'll evaluate key factors influencing lung cancer outcomes within the context of two distinct geographical areas: ZIP Code 28652 (a hypothetical rural area) and Minneapolis, Minnesota. We'll consider primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, all crucial elements in early detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being.

**ZIP Code 28652: A Rural Landscape**

Assessing lung cancer care in 28652 necessitates understanding the challenges inherent in rural healthcare. The area, hypothetically, likely faces significant hurdles. Physician-to-patient ratios are almost certainly less favorable compared to urban centers. This translates to potentially longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialized care, and a heavier burden on primary care physicians. These physicians, often acting as the first point of contact, play a critical role in screening, diagnosis, and initial treatment coordination. A strained primary care system can lead to delayed diagnoses, impacting the effectiveness of treatment.

Standout practices in 28652, if they exist, would be those demonstrating innovative approaches to address these challenges. This might include practices actively recruiting and retaining physicians, offering extended hours, and implementing robust patient education programs. The presence of a dedicated oncology nurse navigator, assisting patients through the complex healthcare system, would be a significant advantage. Such a role can bridge gaps in care, ensuring patients receive timely referrals, understand their treatment options, and access necessary support services.

Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor in improving lung cancer outcomes in rural areas. Telehealth allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, reducing the need for long-distance travel and associated burdens. This is particularly important for consultations with pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists who may not be readily available locally. Practices that have embraced telehealth platforms for both consultations and follow-up care are likely to provide superior care.

Mental health resources are often scarce in rural settings. The emotional toll of a lung cancer diagnosis is significant, and access to mental health support is vital. Practices with established partnerships with mental health professionals, offering on-site counseling or facilitating referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Support groups, both in-person and virtual, can also provide invaluable emotional support and a sense of community for patients and their families.

**Minneapolis: An Urban Perspective**

Minneapolis, a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of considerations. While physician-to-patient ratios are generally more favorable than in rural settings, disparities in access to care can still exist, particularly for underserved populations. Analyzing the distribution of specialists and the availability of resources across different neighborhoods is crucial.

Standout practices in Minneapolis would likely be those demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive lung cancer care, from screening to survivorship. This might involve the implementation of advanced screening technologies, such as low-dose CT scans, for high-risk individuals. Practices with multidisciplinary teams, including pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and supportive care specialists, are better equipped to provide coordinated and personalized care.

Telemedicine adoption in Minneapolis is likely to be more widespread than in rural areas. However, the focus should be on how effectively these technologies are integrated into the patient care pathway. Are telehealth appointments readily available? Are patients well-informed about these options? Are these services accessible to all patients, regardless of their socioeconomic status or technological literacy?

Mental health resources in Minneapolis are generally more accessible than in rural areas, but the need remains significant. Practices that proactively screen for mental health concerns, offer on-site counseling, or provide easy access to mental health professionals are demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive patient care. Integrating mental health services into the oncology care pathway can improve treatment adherence, reduce anxiety and depression, and enhance overall quality of life.

**Comparing the Two Landscapes**

The "Lung Cancer Score" for 28652 would likely be lower than for Minneapolis, primarily due to the inherent challenges of rural healthcare. However, the score could be improved by focusing on telemedicine adoption, strengthening primary care, and ensuring access to mental health support. Minneapolis, with its greater resources, has the potential for a higher score, but it must address disparities in access to care and ensure that all patients receive comprehensive and coordinated treatment.

**Key Considerations for Both Areas**

Regardless of location, several factors are critical for improving lung cancer outcomes. Early detection through screening is paramount, especially for high-risk individuals. Patient education about risk factors, symptoms, and screening guidelines is essential. Access to smoking cessation programs is crucial for preventing new cases and improving outcomes for current patients. Finally, the availability of clinical trials and cutting-edge treatments is a significant advantage.

**The Importance of Data Visualization**

Understanding the complexities of lung cancer care requires comprehensive data analysis. Mapping the distribution of healthcare resources, identifying areas with high rates of lung cancer, and visualizing patient outcomes can provide valuable insights. This information can be used to inform policy decisions, allocate resources effectively, and improve patient care.

**Take Action with CartoChrome Maps**

Want to visualize the landscape of lung cancer care in your area? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Gain insights into physician distribution, access to care, and other critical factors. Contact us today to learn how CartoChrome maps can help you make informed decisions and improve lung cancer outcomes in your community.