28736, Glenville, North Carolina Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 28736, Glenville, North Carolina is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 68.45 percent of the residents in 28736 has some form of health insurance. 41.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.54 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28736 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 53 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28736. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 265 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,580 health care providers accessible to residents in 28736, Glenville, North Carolina.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Glenville, NC (ZIP Code 28736)

This analysis evaluates the healthcare landscape in Glenville, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28736), focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and patient support. We will assess the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), the adoption of telehealth, the presence of mental health resources, and other key indicators to generate a "Lung Cancer Score" reflecting the community's preparedness to address this significant health challenge. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview that informs both residents and healthcare providers.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care begins with accessible primary care. In Glenville, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can lead to delayed diagnoses and reduced preventative screenings. To assess this, we must consider the total population of 28736 and the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code or within a reasonable commuting distance. This data, obtained from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau, will be analyzed to determine the ratio. A high ratio (more patients per doctor) suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and preventative care, which are crucial for early lung cancer detection.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are the existing practices concentrated in one area, leaving other parts of Glenville underserved? Are there practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, ensuring access for all residents? The availability of specialists, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, within a reasonable travel distance is also essential. While we are focusing on primary care, the proximity to specialized care is a crucial factor in the overall Lung Cancer Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another key element. The ability to consult with a PCP or specialist remotely can significantly improve access to care, especially for residents in rural areas like Glenville. Telehealth can facilitate initial consultations, follow-up appointments, and medication management, reducing the need for frequent travel and potentially improving patient adherence to treatment plans. We will assess the extent to which local practices offer telehealth services, the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), and the insurance coverage for these services. Practices actively embracing telehealth will receive a higher score.

The presence of mental health resources is often overlooked but is crucial in cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, within the community is therefore a significant factor. We will investigate the presence of mental health clinics, the availability of counseling services, and the integration of mental health support within primary care practices. Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their patients will be recognized.

We must also consider the specific practices within Glenville. Are there any standout practices that demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, early detection, and patient-centered services? This could include practices that offer comprehensive screening programs, employ patient navigators to guide patients through the healthcare system, or actively participate in community outreach programs. These practices, which go above and beyond basic care, will be highlighted.

The quality of care is not solely determined by the number of doctors or the availability of telehealth. It also depends on the quality of the care provided. This includes the use of evidence-based guidelines, the implementation of quality improvement initiatives, and the patient satisfaction levels. While it is difficult to assess these factors directly, we can look for indicators such as accreditation status, patient reviews, and participation in quality reporting programs.

The Lung Cancer Score will be a composite measure, weighting the various factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the presence of standout practices will all contribute to the final score. The score will be presented in a way that is easy to understand, providing a clear picture of the healthcare landscape in Glenville.

To further enhance this analysis, data on lung cancer incidence and mortality rates in 28736 would be valuable. This information, typically available from state health departments, can provide a more complete picture of the community's health needs and the effectiveness of the healthcare system.

The final Lung Cancer Score will be a dynamic measure, reflecting the ever-changing healthcare landscape. As new practices open, telemedicine adoption increases, and mental health resources become more available, the score will be updated to reflect these changes. This continuous assessment will help to identify areas for improvement and to ensure that residents of Glenville have access to the best possible care.

The analysis will also consider the impact of social determinants of health. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and health literacy can significantly affect health outcomes. We will consider how these factors might influence access to care and the effectiveness of lung cancer prevention and treatment efforts.

The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment that informs both residents and healthcare providers. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, this analysis can help to guide efforts to improve lung cancer care in Glenville.

The final Lung Cancer Score will be a valuable resource for anyone seeking to understand the healthcare landscape in Glenville. It will provide a clear and concise overview of the availability of care, the adoption of technology, and the presence of support services. This information can be used to make informed decisions about healthcare choices and to advocate for improvements in the community.

The analysis is not just about numbers and statistics. It is about people. It is about ensuring that residents of Glenville have access to the care they need to live long and healthy lives. The Lung Cancer Score is a tool to help achieve that goal.

The data collection and analysis for this report will be extensive, drawing upon multiple sources to provide a comprehensive and accurate assessment. The final report will be a valuable resource for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

**Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape in Glenville and beyond? Explore the power of spatial data with CartoChrome maps. Gain deeper insights into physician distribution, access to care, and other critical healthcare factors. Visit [CartoChrome website address] to learn more and start mapping today!**