08027, Gibbstown, New Jersey Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 08027, Gibbstown, New Jersey is 79 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.95 percent of the residents in 08027 has some form of health insurance. 38.19 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08027 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 907 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08027. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,144 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 9,111 health care providers accessible to residents in 08027, Gibbstown, New Jersey.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Gibbstown, NJ (ZIP Code 08027)**

Analyzing the healthcare landscape of Gibbstown, New Jersey (ZIP code 08027) requires a nuanced understanding of factors that impact lung cancer outcomes. This analysis focuses on the availability and quality of primary care physicians, as they are the crucial first point of contact for early detection and referral. We also consider the broader healthcare infrastructure, including telemedicine adoption and mental health resources, as these significantly influence patient care and overall well-being. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Lung Cancer Score" assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement within the community.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on accessible and competent primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio in Gibbstown is a critical metric. Data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and local healthcare networks should be examined to determine the number of primary care physicians actively serving the population. A low physician-to-patient ratio can indicate potential access challenges, leading to delayed diagnoses and poorer outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access to care. The analysis should identify the specific number of primary care physicians in the area and compare this to the population size, providing a clear indication of the ratio.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. The analysis must delve into the practices of individual physicians and clinics. This involves evaluating factors such as board certifications, years of experience, and patient satisfaction scores. Online review platforms, such as Healthgrades and Vitals, can offer insights into patient experiences, highlighting strengths like clear communication, thorough examinations, and timely follow-up. The analysis should identify standout practices that consistently receive positive feedback and demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, including lung cancer screening.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in areas like Gibbstown, where geographical limitations or transportation challenges might exist. The analysis should investigate the extent to which primary care practices offer telemedicine services. This includes virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to online patient portals. Telemedicine can improve access to care, reduce wait times, and facilitate more frequent communication between patients and physicians. The analysis should assess the types of telemedicine services available, the ease of access, and the level of patient satisfaction with these services.

The link between mental health and cancer care is well-established. Patients diagnosed with lung cancer often experience significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and fear. The availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals is crucial. The analysis should identify the presence of mental health professionals within primary care practices, such as psychologists, therapists, or counselors. It should also assess the ease of access to these resources, the availability of support groups, and the integration of mental health services into the overall care plan.

Furthermore, the analysis should examine the availability of lung cancer screening programs. Early detection through low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly improves survival rates. The analysis should identify the availability of LDCT screening programs within Gibbstown or in nearby communities. It should assess the eligibility criteria for screening, the ease of access to screening facilities, and the level of patient education regarding lung cancer screening.

The analysis should also consider the availability of specialized care. While primary care physicians are the first point of contact, patients diagnosed with lung cancer require access to oncologists, pulmonologists, and other specialists. The analysis should identify the location of these specialists, the ease of referral, and the coordination of care between primary care physicians and specialists.

The "Lung Cancer Score" for Gibbstown should be a composite measure, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses identified in the analysis. This score could be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above, such as physician-to-patient ratio, quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and access to screening and specialized care. A higher score would indicate a more favorable environment for lung cancer care, while a lower score would highlight areas needing improvement.

The analysis should conclude with specific recommendations for improving the "Lung Cancer Score." These recommendations could include increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption, expanding mental health resources, and increasing awareness of lung cancer screening programs. The recommendations should be tailored to the specific needs of the Gibbstown community and should be actionable and measurable.

The findings should be presented in a clear and concise manner, using data visualization tools such as charts and graphs to illustrate key findings. This will allow for a more accessible and easily understood presentation of the information.

The analysis should also consider demographic factors that may influence lung cancer outcomes, such as age, race, and socioeconomic status. These factors can impact access to care, screening rates, and treatment outcomes. The analysis should identify any disparities in care and recommend strategies to address them.

Finally, the analysis should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. The healthcare environment is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatments, and policies emerging. Regular updates will ensure that the "Lung Cancer Score" remains relevant and useful.

For a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Gibbstown, including the location of physicians, hospitals, and other healthcare resources, explore the CartoChrome maps. This interactive platform allows you to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment in your community.