The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15216, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.44 percent of the residents in 15216 has some form of health insurance. 29.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.20 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15216 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,799 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 201 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15216. An estimate of 171 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,312 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 68,396 health care providers accessible to residents in 15216, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15216, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 82 |
---|---|
People Score | 38 |
Provider Score | 90 |
Hospital Score | 43 |
Travel Score | 71 |
15216 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Pittsburgh, PA (ZIP Code 15216)
This analysis evaluates the availability and quality of lung cancer care within the 15216 ZIP code, focusing on primary care access, physician resources, and ancillary services crucial for patient outcomes. We will also consider the broader context of primary care availability within Pittsburgh, PA, as it significantly impacts early detection and overall patient management. This assessment aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape for lung cancer patients in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests on robust primary care. Early detection through screening, prompt referrals to specialists, and ongoing management of co-morbidities are all facilitated by accessible and responsive primary care physicians (PCPs). In the 15216 ZIP code, and indeed across Pittsburgh, the physician-to-patient ratio for PCPs is a critical factor. While precise figures fluctuate, the general trend suggests a potential for strain, especially in underserved communities. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and ultimately, delayed diagnoses.
Within 15216, we need to examine the distribution of PCPs. Are they concentrated in certain areas, creating healthcare deserts for some residents? Are there sufficient numbers of PCPs accepting new patients, particularly those with government-sponsored insurance or limited financial resources? These factors directly impact a patient's ability to access timely care, a crucial element in lung cancer management. The availability of multilingual providers is another important consideration, given the diverse population of Pittsburgh.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as adherence to screening guidelines for high-risk individuals (e.g., smokers and former smokers). A PCP’s willingness to order low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans, as recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, is a key indicator of proactive lung cancer screening. Furthermore, the PCP’s understanding of lung cancer risk factors and their ability to counsel patients on smoking cessation are essential components of preventative care.
The presence of standout primary care practices within or serving 15216 warrants specific attention. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, offer extended hours, and have a demonstrated commitment to preventative medicine should be recognized. These practices often serve as models for others, demonstrating best practices in patient management and care coordination. Reviews from patients, both positive and negative, can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and the quality of care provided.
Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges in the context of lung cancer care. Telehealth can enhance access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. It can facilitate virtual consultations with specialists, remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment, and delivery of educational materials. However, the digital divide, where access to technology and internet connectivity varies, can create barriers to telemedicine for some patients. The successful implementation of telemedicine requires careful consideration of patient demographics, technological infrastructure, and the need for in-person follow-up care.
Mental health resources are an integral part of comprehensive lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis, and the subsequent treatment, can lead to significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and fear. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, is crucial for supporting patients through their journey. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, can provide patients with a sense of community and shared experience. Integration of mental health services within primary care practices and oncology clinics is a best practice, ensuring that patients receive holistic care.
The network of specialists within and around 15216 is another key factor. The availability of pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists is critical for timely diagnosis, staging, and treatment of lung cancer. The proximity of these specialists to primary care practices and hospitals is important for seamless care coordination. The presence of multidisciplinary tumor boards, where specialists collaborate to develop individualized treatment plans, is a sign of a robust cancer care system.
The quality of hospitals and cancer centers serving the 15216 area is also a major consideration. This includes factors such as the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies, the experience of the medical staff, and the patient survival rates. Hospitals with accreditation from organizations like the Commission on Cancer (CoC) demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality cancer care.
The overall healthcare ecosystem in Pittsburgh plays a significant role in the lung cancer landscape. The city's research institutions, such as the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), contribute to advancements in cancer research and treatment. The availability of clinical trials offers patients access to cutting-edge therapies. Public health initiatives aimed at reducing smoking rates and promoting early detection are also important factors in improving lung cancer outcomes.
The overall score for lung cancer care in 15216 is a complex calculation. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, the presence of specialists, and the quality of hospitals and cancer centers. The score is not a static number, but rather a dynamic assessment that can change over time. Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to identify areas for improvement and ensure that patients receive the best possible care.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Pittsburgh, including physician distribution, hospital locations, and demographic data relevant to lung cancer risk, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like