The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15301, Washington, Pennsylvania is 69 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.34 percent of the residents in 15301 has some form of health insurance. 40.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.41 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15301 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 9,825 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15301. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 10,397 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,092 health care providers accessible to residents in 15301, Washington, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15301, Washington, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 34 |
---|---|
People Score | 17 |
Provider Score | 69 |
Hospital Score | 14 |
Travel Score | 69 |
15301 | Washington | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Washington, PA (ZIP Code 15301) and Primary Care Landscape
This analysis provides a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 15301 (Washington, PA) and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington County, focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and patient support. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in navigating the complexities of a lung cancer diagnosis. The goal is to assess the overall "Lung Cancer Score" for the region, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.
The core of this assessment hinges on the accessibility and quality of primary care. Early detection is paramount in lung cancer treatment, and primary care physicians (PCPs) often serve as the first point of contact, crucial for screening, referral, and ongoing management. The physician-to-patient ratio within 15301 and the surrounding Washington County is a fundamental metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Census Bureau, when combined, can provide an estimate of this ratio. This ratio, however, must be interpreted cautiously, as it doesn't reflect the distribution of PCPs across different healthcare systems or the specific patient demographics within the region.
Standout practices within the area significantly influence the overall "Lung Cancer Score." Identifying practices with a strong reputation for patient care, particularly those with expertise in pulmonology or oncology, is critical. These practices often possess advanced diagnostic capabilities, such as low-dose CT scanning, and may have established relationships with specialized cancer centers. Researching online reviews, patient testimonials, and physician profiles can help identify these standout practices. Furthermore, examining the affiliations of these practices – whether they are part of larger healthcare networks or independent – provides insights into resource access and potential collaboration with specialists. The presence of certified lung cancer screening centers, adhering to the guidelines of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, is a significant positive indicator.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role in healthcare delivery, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. The availability of telehealth services can improve access to specialists, facilitate remote monitoring of patients undergoing treatment, and provide convenient follow-up appointments. The "Lung Cancer Score" will be positively impacted by practices that offer telehealth options for both primary care and specialist consultations. This includes assessing the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring tools, and the ability to share medical records electronically. Telemedicine can be especially beneficial for patients with mobility issues or those living far from major medical centers.
The mental health of patients diagnosed with lung cancer is a critical consideration. A cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health resources is essential for patient well-being and treatment adherence. The "Lung Cancer Score" must reflect the availability of mental health services, including counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care. This involves assessing the presence of mental health professionals within primary care practices, the availability of referrals to mental health specialists, and the existence of support groups specifically for cancer patients. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan is a crucial factor in improving patient outcomes.
The assessment of primary care availability in Washington County, beyond ZIP code 15301, requires a broader perspective. This includes evaluating the geographic distribution of PCPs, the availability of transportation options for patients, and the presence of community health centers. Areas with limited access to primary care may experience delayed diagnoses and poorer health outcomes. The "Lung Cancer Score" will be lower in areas with significant disparities in access to care. Examining the availability of mobile screening units or outreach programs targeting high-risk populations can also provide valuable insights.
Data from various sources, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the National Cancer Institute, and local healthcare providers, can be used to compile the necessary information for this analysis. The accuracy of the "Lung Cancer Score" will depend on the quality and availability of data. The analysis should also consider the demographics of the population within 15301 and Washington County, including age, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of risk factors for lung cancer, such as smoking history.
The "Lung Cancer Score" for 15301 and Washington County is a dynamic measure, influenced by a multitude of factors. The score will be higher in areas with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices with advanced diagnostic capabilities, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. Conversely, the score will be lower in areas with limited access to primary care, a lack of specialized services, and inadequate mental health support. The "Lung Cancer Score" is not a static rating, but rather a snapshot of the healthcare landscape at a specific point in time, and it can change as healthcare services evolve.
In conclusion, a comprehensive assessment of the "Lung Cancer Score" requires a detailed examination of multiple factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the healthcare landscape in 15301 and Washington County, highlighting areas of strength and areas that require improvement. This information can be used by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to improve access to care and ultimately improve outcomes for individuals affected by lung cancer.
To visualize and better understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including the location of PCPs, specialist practices, and mental health services, we recommend utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that can help you identify areas with the best access to care and highlight potential gaps in service.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like