The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15362, Spraggs, Pennsylvania is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.66 percent of the residents in 15362 has some form of health insurance. 37.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15362 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 135 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15362. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 130 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 682 health care providers accessible to residents in 15362, Spraggs, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15362, Spraggs, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 51 |
---|---|
People Score | 84 |
Provider Score | 24 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 29 |
15362 | Spraggs | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 15362 & Primary Care in Spraggs
Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality, particularly concerning lung cancer care, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP Code 15362, incorporating primary care availability within the Spraggs area, to generate a "Lung Cancer Score." This score, though a composite, aims to provide a snapshot of the resources available to patients facing this serious disease. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and consider the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of comprehensive lung cancer care.
The foundation of effective lung cancer treatment rests on early detection and timely intervention. This necessitates a robust primary care infrastructure. In Spraggs, evaluating primary care availability involves assessing the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) relative to the population. Sparse PCP availability can lead to delayed diagnoses, as patients may struggle to secure timely appointments for screenings and initial evaluations. The distance patients must travel to access primary care also significantly impacts access. Longer travel times can deter individuals from seeking care, particularly for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. This geographic accessibility is a critical factor in the Lung Cancer Score.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a key metric. A low ratio, indicating a limited number of physicians for a given population, can create bottlenecks in the healthcare system. This can result in longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, a less thorough diagnostic process. A high physician-to-patient ratio, conversely, suggests better access and potentially more comprehensive care. Data on physician distribution within ZIP Code 15362, including specialists involved in lung cancer care (pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons), is essential for a complete picture. These specialists are vital for diagnosis, treatment planning, and ongoing management of the disease.
Identifying standout practices within the area is crucial. This involves evaluating factors such as the quality of diagnostic equipment (e.g., access to advanced imaging like PET scans), adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to early detection through proactive screening programs, such as low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals, will be considered favorably. Furthermore, practices that offer multidisciplinary care, bringing together pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, and other specialists to collaborate on patient care, are often associated with better outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments and medication management, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or with mobility issues. Telemedicine can also facilitate communication between patients and their care teams, providing ongoing support and addressing concerns promptly. The Lung Cancer Score will consider the availability and utilization of telemedicine services by primary care providers and specialists within the target area. The ease of access to these services, the types of services offered, and patient satisfaction with telemedicine experiences are all relevant factors.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, who specialize in oncology or chronic illness is essential. The Lung Cancer Score will assess the proximity and accessibility of mental health services within the area, including whether these services are integrated into the cancer care pathway. This includes the availability of support groups, counseling services, and psychiatric care.
The Spraggs area, with its potential rural characteristics, may face unique challenges regarding healthcare access. This could include limited public transportation, a shortage of healthcare professionals, and a lack of readily available specialized services. These factors must be considered when evaluating the Lung Cancer Score. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, potentially involving initiatives to attract and retain healthcare professionals, improve transportation options, and leverage telemedicine to bridge geographical barriers.
Data on insurance coverage and healthcare costs also play a role. Affordability is a major determinant of access to care. The Lung Cancer Score will take into account the prevalence of various insurance plans within the area, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance. It will also consider the cost of care, including the cost of screenings, diagnostic tests, treatments, and medications. Practices that offer financial assistance programs or participate in value-based care models may receive higher scores.
Furthermore, the Lung Cancer Score will consider patient education and advocacy. Practices that provide patients with comprehensive information about lung cancer, treatment options, and support services are essential. This includes educational materials, support groups, and access to patient navigators who can help patients navigate the healthcare system. The availability of these resources can empower patients to make informed decisions about their care and improve their overall well-being.
The final Lung Cancer Score for ZIP Code 15362, incorporating primary care availability in Spraggs, will be a composite measure reflecting all these factors. It will provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in this area. It will highlight areas for improvement and inform efforts to enhance access to quality lung cancer care. The score will be dynamic, reflecting changes in the healthcare landscape, such as new treatment options, technological advancements, and policy changes.
To gain a more granular understanding of healthcare resources and access within ZIP Code 15362, including visualizing physician locations, hospital proximity, and demographics related to lung cancer risk factors, explore the interactive maps available through CartoChrome. Their platform offers a powerful way to visualize and analyze the data discussed, providing a comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like