The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15544, Gray, Pennsylvania is 83 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15544 has some form of health insurance. 23.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15544 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 29 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15544. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 31 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 762 health care providers accessible to residents in 15544, Gray, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15544, Gray, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 93 |
---|---|
People Score | 54 |
Provider Score | 83 |
Hospital Score | 74 |
Travel Score | 61 |
15544 | Gray | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 15544 and Gray, PA Primary Care**
This analysis assesses primary care resources within ZIP Code 15544 (which encompasses the town of Gray, Pennsylvania) through the lens of factors relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and patient well-being. The goal is to provide a "Lung Cancer Score" perspective, considering physician availability, technology adoption, and support services. This is not a definitive medical evaluation, but rather a comparative analysis based on publicly available data and general industry trends.
The cornerstone of effective lung cancer management is early detection and prompt treatment. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms or at high risk. Therefore, the physician-to-patient ratio in Gray is a crucial starting point. Publicly available data suggests that the physician-to-patient ratio in rural areas like Gray can be significantly lower than in urban centers. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and diagnoses. The specific ratio for 15544 requires further investigation. We would need to ascertain the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code and the total population. This information, however, is the foundation for evaluating access to care.
Beyond sheer numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are the available physicians concentrated in a single clinic, or are they spread across multiple practices? A concentration could potentially lead to bottlenecks in access. Furthermore, the age and experience of the physicians are relevant. While all licensed physicians are qualified to provide care, experience in diagnosing and managing respiratory conditions can be a significant advantage.
Standout practices in the area would be those that demonstrate a commitment to lung cancer prevention and early detection. This includes actively promoting smoking cessation programs, offering regular screenings for high-risk individuals (e.g., those with a history of smoking or exposure to carcinogens), and utilizing evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Practices that have invested in advanced diagnostic technologies, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening, would also score favorably.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. In a rural area like Gray, telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers and improve access to specialist consultations. Practices that offer telehealth services for follow-up appointments, medication management, and even initial consultations can significantly improve patient convenience and potentially expedite care. The availability of telehealth capabilities, especially for respiratory issues, is a strong positive indicator.
Mental health resources are frequently overlooked but are integral to patient care. A lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally taxing. The availability of mental health support, such as counseling services, support groups, and psychiatric care, is critical for patients' overall well-being. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care model or have established referral pathways to mental health providers will be considered more comprehensive.
The specifics of mental health resources within the 15544 area require careful scrutiny. Are there local therapists, counselors, or psychiatrists? Are these resources readily accessible and affordable? The presence of support groups, especially those focused on cancer patients and their families, is another positive indicator.
The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) is also important. EHRs facilitate the seamless sharing of patient information between different healthcare providers, reducing the risk of errors and ensuring that all providers have access to the most up-to-date information. Practices that utilize interoperable EHR systems can improve the coordination of care and enhance the patient experience.
The Lung Cancer Score, therefore, is a composite measure. It would take into account the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of screening and diagnostic technologies, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health services, and the use of EHRs. Each of these factors would be weighted based on their relative importance in the overall care process.
To improve the score, several actions could be considered. Increasing the number of PCPs in the area would be a primary goal. Promoting the adoption of telemedicine among existing practices would also be beneficial. Investing in advanced diagnostic technologies, such as LDCT scanners, would improve the capacity for early detection. Finally, expanding access to mental health services and integrating them into the care model would enhance the overall patient experience.
The "Lung Cancer Score" is not a static measure. It is a dynamic indicator that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that patients in Gray have access to the best possible care. The score is a tool for identifying areas of strength and weakness, and for guiding efforts to improve the quality of care.
The analysis also considers the accessibility of specialists, such as pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. The proximity of these specialists to Gray and the ease with which patients can be referred to them are important factors. The availability of specialized cancer centers or hospitals in the region would also be a significant positive indicator.
Furthermore, the analysis examines the level of patient education and support offered by local healthcare providers. Practices that provide patients with information about lung cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment options are more likely to empower patients to take an active role in their care. The availability of patient navigators or other support staff who can help patients navigate the healthcare system would also be a positive factor.
The final "Lung Cancer Score" for ZIP Code 15544 would be a relative measure, comparing the resources available in Gray to those in other similar rural areas. This comparative analysis would provide a more nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.
The analysis also considers the socioeconomic factors that may affect access to care. Factors such as income levels, insurance coverage, and transportation options can all impact a patient's ability to receive timely and appropriate care. The analysis would take these factors into account when assessing the overall quality of care in Gray.
In conclusion, the “Lung Cancer Score” analysis for ZIP Code 15544 is a multi-faceted assessment of primary care resources. It emphasizes the importance of physician availability, technology adoption, mental health support, and patient education. This analysis is designed to provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape in Gray, Pennsylvania, and to identify opportunities for improvement.
Ready to visualize the primary care landscape in Gray, PA and see how it compares to other areas? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Gain insights into physician distribution, access to care, and more.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like