15641, Hyde Park, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15641, Hyde Park, Pennsylvania is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.95 percent of the residents in 15641 has some form of health insurance. 42.68 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15641 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 111 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15641. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 86 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,050 health care providers accessible to residents in 15641, Hyde Park, Pennsylvania.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Hyde Park, PA (ZIP Code 15641)

This analysis evaluates the landscape of lung cancer care within Hyde Park, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 15641), focusing on the availability and quality of primary care services, a crucial element in early detection and management of this disease. The assessment considers factors impacting patient access, physician availability, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem, enabling informed decision-making for residents and healthcare professionals.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care lies in robust primary care. Early detection through screening, prompt referrals to specialists, and ongoing management of co-morbidities are vital. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) within the 15641 ZIP code is a critical metric. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio provides an initial gauge of access. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced individual attention, impacting preventative care and timely intervention. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards, should be consulted to determine the specific physician-to-patient ratio within Hyde Park. A lower ratio generally suggests better access.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are physicians concentrated in a single practice, or are they spread across multiple locations within the ZIP code? Geographic accessibility is paramount, especially for elderly or mobility-impaired individuals. Proximity to a primary care facility is crucial for regular check-ups and follow-up appointments. The presence of public transportation options to these facilities can further improve access for those without personal vehicles.

Identifying standout practices within Hyde Park is essential. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, patient education, and coordinated care. Factors to consider include the practice's utilization of electronic health records (EHRs), which facilitates information sharing and care coordination. Does the practice offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate patient schedules? Does the practice have a dedicated nurse navigator or care coordinator to assist patients through the healthcare system? Patient reviews and testimonials can provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the quality of care.

The adoption of telemedicine is a significant factor in assessing the accessibility and quality of care. Telemedicine offers the potential to overcome geographic barriers and improve access to specialists. Does the primary care practice offer virtual consultations for routine follow-ups or medication management? Does the practice facilitate virtual referrals to pulmonologists or oncologists for lung cancer screening or treatment? The availability of telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas or those with limited mobility.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of comprehensive lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. The availability of mental health services within the primary care setting or through referrals is crucial. Does the practice screen for depression and anxiety? Does the practice have a relationship with local mental health providers? Are there support groups or counseling services available for cancer patients and their families? Addressing the psychological aspects of the disease is essential for improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Further, the integration of other healthcare professionals into the primary care setting can enhance the quality of care. The presence of registered dietitians, physical therapists, and social workers can provide comprehensive support for patients undergoing cancer treatment. Does the practice have these resources on-site or offer referrals to these specialists? The availability of these services can improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on primary care physicians.

The analysis should also consider the practice’s involvement in lung cancer screening programs. Does the practice actively promote lung cancer screening for eligible patients, such as those with a history of smoking? Does the practice have protocols in place for ordering and following up on low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans? The practice’s commitment to early detection can significantly improve patient survival rates.

Finally, assessing the practice’s commitment to patient education is essential. Does the practice provide patients with information about lung cancer risk factors, symptoms, and treatment options? Does the practice offer smoking cessation programs or resources? Patient education empowers individuals to take an active role in their health and make informed decisions about their care.

In conclusion, evaluating the lung cancer care landscape in Hyde Park (ZIP Code 15641) requires a multi-faceted approach. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and considering mental health resources are crucial elements. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem and identifying areas for improvement.

For a detailed visual representation of physician locations, healthcare facility accessibility, and demographic data relevant to lung cancer care in Hyde Park, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a deeper dive into the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and provides valuable insights for both patients and healthcare providers.