15772, Rossiter, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15772, Rossiter, Pennsylvania is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.24 percent of the residents in 15772 has some form of health insurance. 58.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15772 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 350 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15772. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 285 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,086 health care providers accessible to residents in 15772, Rossiter, Pennsylvania.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Rossiter, PA (ZIP Code 15772)

This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) within the 15772 ZIP code, focusing on factors crucial for early detection and comprehensive patient care. The assessment considers physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, all critical components in a patient's journey with lung cancer. This analysis is specifically tailored to Rossiter, Pennsylvania, and its surrounding area.

The foundation of a strong lung cancer care system rests on accessible primary care. Early detection significantly improves survival rates, making regular check-ups and proactive screening vital. Physician-to-patient ratios in Rossiter and the surrounding areas are a key indicator. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying critical screenings and diagnoses. Publicly available data on physician density, such as that provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), should be consulted to determine the exact ratio within the 15772 ZIP code. This data is crucial in determining the baseline accessibility of care.

Beyond raw numbers, the characteristics of individual practices are paramount. Practices offering comprehensive services, including on-site or readily accessible diagnostic imaging (X-rays, CT scans), are highly desirable. The ability to perform or rapidly arrange for these tests streamlines the diagnostic process, reducing patient anxiety and accelerating the time to treatment if cancer is suspected. Furthermore, the availability of electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate seamless information sharing between specialists and the PCP is crucial. These systems ensure that all involved healthcare professionals have access to the most up-to-date patient information.

Telemedicine, especially in rural areas like Rossiter, plays a significant role in improving access to care. The adoption of telemedicine by PCPs allows for virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring. This can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility issues, those living far from medical facilities, or those seeking specialist consultations. Practices that offer telemedicine options demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and potentially reduce the burden on the healthcare system. The ease of access to specialists via telemedicine can also greatly improve the quality of care for patients.

The emotional toll of a lung cancer diagnosis is substantial. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referral networks is critical. Practices that proactively screen for depression, anxiety, and other mental health concerns, and offer access to counseling or psychiatric services, are providing a more holistic approach to patient care. Integrated mental health services ensure that patients receive comprehensive support throughout their treatment journey. This support is essential for managing the stress and emotional challenges associated with a cancer diagnosis.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into individual physician profiles. Factors to consider include board certifications, years of experience, and patient reviews. Practices with a strong reputation for patient satisfaction, a focus on preventative care, and a commitment to continuing medical education are likely to provide superior care. Researching individual practices and physicians is crucial. Online resources such as Healthgrades, Vitals, and Zocdoc can provide valuable insights into physician ratings, patient experiences, and practice offerings.

The process of evaluating a Lung Cancer Score involves assessing each of these factors and assigning a weight to each based on its importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might carry a higher weight than the availability of telemedicine, depending on the specific needs of the community. Practices demonstrating excellence in multiple areas, such as readily available diagnostic imaging, telemedicine options, and integrated mental health services, would receive higher scores. This scoring system should be transparent and based on readily available data.

The analysis should consider the presence of patient navigators or care coordinators. These individuals play a crucial role in guiding patients through the complex healthcare system, coordinating appointments, and providing emotional support. Practices that employ navigators demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care and can significantly improve the patient experience. They are essential in coordinating the various aspects of a patient's care.

The availability of smoking cessation programs is another vital factor. Primary care physicians should actively counsel patients on the dangers of smoking and offer resources to help them quit. These programs are essential for preventing lung cancer and improving overall health outcomes. Access to these programs can significantly reduce the risk of developing lung cancer.

Finally, the analysis should consider the practice's adherence to established guidelines for lung cancer screening, such as those recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). This includes the appropriate use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for eligible individuals. Practices that actively promote and implement these screening guidelines demonstrate a commitment to early detection and preventative care. Adherence to these guidelines is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

In conclusion, a comprehensive Lung Cancer Score for primary care in Rossiter (15772) involves a multi-faceted assessment. It considers physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and adherence to screening guidelines. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.

**For a more detailed and visually informative analysis of healthcare resources in Rossiter and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to care, explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Use the data to better understand the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about your health.**