15948, Revloc, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 15948, Revloc, Pennsylvania is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15948 has some form of health insurance. 76.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 36.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15948 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 179 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15948. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 120 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,216 health care providers accessible to residents in 15948, Revloc, Pennsylvania.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15948 and Primary Care Availability in Revloc**

This analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 15948, encompassing the Revloc area, focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, and related resources. This evaluation considers factors crucial for timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and comprehensive patient support, all vital in the fight against lung cancer. The goal is to provide an informed perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare infrastructure, aiding residents in navigating their healthcare options.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care lies in accessible and robust primary care. Revloc, a community within 15948, requires careful scrutiny regarding its primary care availability. Assessing this involves examining the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the immediate area and the patient population they serve. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can indicate potential challenges, such as longer wait times for appointments, which can delay crucial screenings and diagnoses. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially leading to earlier detection and intervention.

Beyond sheer numbers, the type and quality of primary care services are critical. Does the available primary care offer comprehensive services, including preventative screenings like low-dose CT scans, which are essential for early lung cancer detection? Do these practices actively participate in patient education programs focused on smoking cessation and other risk factor mitigation? The presence of these services significantly impacts the overall lung cancer score.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a key indicator. Accurately determining this requires data on the number of PCPs and specialists (pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons) practicing within 15948 and the estimated population. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and state medical boards can be used. A low physician-to-patient ratio, especially for specialists, can create bottlenecks in the healthcare system. Patients may face extended wait times for consultations, diagnostic procedures, and treatment initiation, which can negatively affect outcomes.

The analysis must also consider the availability of specialists. Lung cancer treatment often involves a multidisciplinary approach, requiring collaboration between pulmonologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. The proximity and availability of these specialists within 15948 and the surrounding areas are crucial. A lack of specialists can force patients to travel significant distances for care, adding to the burden of their illness.

The presence of standout practices within the area is another critical factor. Identifying practices that demonstrate a commitment to excellence in lung cancer care involves looking at several factors. These include the use of evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, participation in clinical trials, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that actively embrace new technologies and treatment modalities, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapy, often provide a higher level of care.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. The availability of telemedicine consultations with specialists can bridge geographical barriers, providing patients with access to expert opinions without requiring extensive travel. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for follow-up appointments and consultations. This is particularly valuable for patients managing chronic conditions or undergoing treatment.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of lung cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can be devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in oncology, is essential. Practices that offer integrated mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care.

The analysis should also consider the availability of support groups and patient education programs. These resources provide patients with emotional support, information about their disease, and practical guidance on managing their symptoms and treatment side effects. The presence of these programs can significantly improve patients’ quality of life and their ability to cope with their illness.

Finally, the analysis needs to look at the availability of ancillary services, such as diagnostic imaging (CT scans, PET scans), radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The proximity and accessibility of these services are crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment. Patients should not have to travel long distances to receive essential care.

The overall lung cancer score for 15948 and Revloc would be based on a composite of these factors. The score would reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare infrastructure, providing a valuable tool for residents seeking care. A high score would indicate a robust healthcare system with excellent access to primary care, specialists, and supportive resources. A low score would highlight areas needing improvement, such as physician shortages or a lack of mental health services.

This assessment, however, is a snapshot in time. The healthcare landscape is dynamic, with changes in physician availability, technological advancements, and evolving treatment protocols. Therefore, continuous monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure that residents of 15948 and Revloc have access to the best possible lung cancer care.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 15948 and Revloc, including physician locations, hospital locations, and other relevant data, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps offer a powerful tool for visualizing and understanding the healthcare resources available in your community.