The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 16154, Transfer, Pennsylvania is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.91 percent of the residents in 16154 has some form of health insurance. 43.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16154 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 247 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16154. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 495 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,156 health care providers accessible to residents in 16154, Transfer, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16154, Transfer, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 76 |
---|---|
People Score | 63 |
Provider Score | 73 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 54 |
16154 | Transfer | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis evaluates the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 16154, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) availability in Transfer, Pennsylvania, and related factors impacting patient outcomes. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare environment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses to inform both patients and healthcare providers.
The physician-to-patient ratio within 16154 and the surrounding areas is a critical starting point. A low ratio can lead to delayed diagnoses, reduced access to preventive care, and overall poorer health outcomes. Researching the specific number of PCPs actively practicing within the zip code, compared to the population size, is essential. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and professional medical associations can provide this information. This data will reveal whether there are enough PCPs to meet the needs of the community, particularly concerning the early detection and management of lung cancer.
The availability of primary care is especially significant because PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms suggestive of lung cancer. Timely referrals to specialists, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, are crucial for successful treatment. The analysis must therefore examine the referral pathways and the waiting times to see specialists. This assessment should involve contacting local practices and hospitals to gather data on appointment availability and referral processes.
Standout practices within the area warrant specific recognition. Identifying practices that demonstrate excellence in lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and patient management is crucial. This assessment should consider factors like adherence to national guidelines, the use of advanced diagnostic technologies (such as low-dose CT scans), and patient satisfaction scores. Researching the practice’s commitment to patient education, smoking cessation programs, and supportive care services (like palliative care) is also essential. These practices may serve as models for others in the area.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The use of telehealth services, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients living in rural or underserved areas. This analysis should investigate the extent to which local PCPs and specialists offer telemedicine options. This involves assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and the integration of telehealth platforms into the overall care delivery model.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are vital for lung cancer patients. A diagnosis of lung cancer can cause significant emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, and fear. The availability of mental health support services, such as counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care, is therefore a crucial component of comprehensive cancer care. This analysis needs to identify the mental health resources available to patients in 16154. This includes assessing the proximity of mental health providers, the availability of mental health services within local hospitals and clinics, and the integration of mental health support into the overall cancer care plan.
The analysis should also consider the presence of smoking cessation programs. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, and effective smoking cessation programs are crucial for preventing new cases and improving outcomes for current patients. Identifying the availability of these programs, their accessibility, and their success rates is essential. This may involve assessing the programs offered by local hospitals, clinics, and community organizations.
Furthermore, the analysis should evaluate the access to specialized cancer care, including pulmonologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons. This involves examining the number of specialists practicing in the area, their expertise, and their availability. The analysis should also assess the proximity of cancer treatment centers, the availability of advanced treatment options (such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies), and the quality of care provided. This may involve reviewing patient outcomes data, such as survival rates and patient satisfaction scores.
The impact of socioeconomic factors on lung cancer outcomes must also be considered. Factors such as income, education, and access to transportation can significantly influence a patient's ability to access care and adhere to treatment plans. The analysis should therefore consider the socioeconomic characteristics of the population in 16154 and how these factors may impact lung cancer care. This may involve examining data on poverty rates, educational attainment, and access to transportation.
In addition to the above factors, the analysis should consider the availability of patient navigation services. Patient navigators can help patients navigate the complex healthcare system, providing support and guidance throughout their cancer journey. Identifying the availability of these services and their impact on patient outcomes is crucial. This may involve assessing the presence of patient navigators in local hospitals and clinics and their role in coordinating care and providing support to patients.
The quality of communication between healthcare providers and patients is another critical factor. Effective communication is essential for ensuring that patients understand their diagnosis, treatment options, and prognosis. The analysis should assess the communication practices of local healthcare providers, including their ability to explain complex medical information in a clear and understandable manner, their willingness to answer patient questions, and their responsiveness to patient concerns.
The analysis should also consider the availability of clinical trials. Clinical trials offer patients access to the latest treatment options and can improve outcomes. Identifying the availability of clinical trials in the area and the eligibility criteria for participation is essential. This may involve researching the clinical trials offered by local hospitals and cancer centers and their participation in national clinical trial networks.
The overall goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the lung cancer care landscape in 16154, identifying areas of strength and weakness. This information can be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the resources available and the areas that need improvement. This assessment should also consider the impact of health insurance coverage on access to care. The analysis should examine the types of insurance coverage available in the area, the affordability of healthcare services, and the impact of insurance coverage on patient outcomes.
To further explore the healthcare landscape within 16154 and beyond, and to visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, we encourage you to utilize the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a dynamic and interactive way to understand the complexities of healthcare access and availability.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like