The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 16249, Rural Valley, Pennsylvania is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.84 percent of the residents in 16249 has some form of health insurance. 40.56 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16249 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 384 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16249. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 409 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 536 health care providers accessible to residents in 16249, Rural Valley, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16249, Rural Valley, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 45 |
---|---|
People Score | 73 |
Provider Score | 38 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 37 |
16249 | Rural Valley | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Rural Valley, PA (ZIP Code 16249)**
The assessment of lung cancer care availability in Rural Valley, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16249) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on the quality and accessibility of primary care physicians, the presence of specialists crucial for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, all within the context of a rural community. A ‘Lung Cancer Score’ is not a formalized metric, but rather a composite assessment based on these key factors, providing a relative understanding of the healthcare landscape.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care begins with accessible and competent primary care physicians. These doctors are the first point of contact, responsible for early detection through screening and referrals. The physician-to-patient ratio in Rural Valley is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors serving a larger population, can translate to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and national sources, such as the U.S. Census Bureau, would be essential to ascertain the exact ratio. This data, however, is often aggregated at the county level (Armstrong County, in this case), which may not accurately reflect the situation in the specific ZIP code.
Identifying standout practices within Rural Valley is crucial. These practices should be recognized for their commitment to preventive care, including smoking cessation programs and lung cancer screening protocols. Factors to consider include the number of board-certified physicians, the practice’s use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient patient management, and their adherence to national guidelines for lung cancer screening. Practices actively promoting patient education and offering support groups would also be considered favorably. A practice demonstrating a proactive approach to lung cancer prevention and early detection would be highly valued.
The availability of specialists is another critical element. While primary care physicians can initiate the process, patients diagnosed with lung cancer require access to pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, and radiation oncologists. The presence of these specialists within a reasonable geographic radius is paramount. If these specialists are not readily available in Rural Valley, patients will need to travel, which can create significant barriers to care, especially for those with limited mobility or transportation challenges. The distance to the nearest specialist and the availability of appointments are critical considerations in this evaluation.
Telemedicine is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices and specialists can significantly improve access to care. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, follow-up appointments, and even access to specialists located further away. The availability of telehealth services, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the ease of access (e.g., technology requirements, insurance coverage) are important factors in the overall assessment. Practices that have embraced telemedicine and integrated it into their standard of care would receive a higher score.
Mental health support is often overlooked but is a critical aspect of cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is essential. The ease of access to these resources, including the availability of mental health professionals who specialize in oncology, is a key consideration. Practices that integrate mental health services into their treatment plans and offer support for patients and their families would receive a higher score.
The impact of socioeconomic factors cannot be ignored. Rural Valley may have a population with lower incomes, limited access to transportation, and other challenges. These factors can affect access to care and the ability to adhere to treatment plans. The availability of resources to address these challenges, such as financial assistance programs, transportation services, and patient navigation programs, is an important consideration. The ability of the healthcare system to address the unique needs of the community is essential.
Assessing the overall ‘Lung Cancer Score’ requires a careful synthesis of these factors. A high score would indicate a healthcare environment with readily accessible primary care physicians, a robust network of specialists, a strong adoption of telemedicine, comprehensive mental health support, and a proactive approach to addressing socioeconomic barriers. A lower score would indicate challenges in one or more of these areas, potentially leading to delays in diagnosis, limited access to treatment, and a poorer quality of life for patients.
The analysis would also need to account for the presence of any local hospitals or clinics. The services offered at these facilities, including diagnostic imaging capabilities (e.g., CT scans), radiation therapy, and surgical options, are critical. The accreditation status of these facilities and their adherence to national quality standards are also important considerations. The presence of a comprehensive cancer center, even if located outside of Rural Valley, would improve the score.
In conclusion, assessing lung cancer care availability in Rural Valley is a complex process. The availability of data, the specific practices and resources available, and the ability to address the unique needs of the community are all critical factors. A thorough analysis would require detailed information from various sources. Understanding the healthcare landscape is essential for improving outcomes for those impacted by lung cancer.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources in Rural Valley and the surrounding areas, including the location of physicians, specialists, and healthcare facilities, consider using the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. Explore the data and gain a clearer perspective on the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like