16725, Custer City, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 16725, Custer City, Pennsylvania is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 78.13 percent of the residents in 16725 has some form of health insurance. 62.50 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 15.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16725 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 31 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16725. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 9 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 338 health care providers accessible to residents in 16725, Custer City, Pennsylvania.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16725 and Primary Care Availability in Custer City**

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 16725, encompassing the Custer City area, requires a multifaceted approach. A "Lung Cancer Score" is a hypothetical metric, and for this analysis, it will be used to assess the availability and quality of care relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and support within this specific geographic context. This analysis will consider primary care access, specialist availability, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources, all critical components of a patient's journey.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 16725 is a crucial starting point. A low ratio can indicate limited access to primary care physicians, potentially delaying early detection of lung cancer symptoms. This scarcity can also affect the timely referral to specialists, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, essential for diagnosis and treatment. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state health departments would be consulted to establish this ratio. A low ratio demands attention, highlighting the need for strategies to improve access, such as incentivizing physician recruitment or expanding telehealth services.

Primary care availability in Custer City is fundamental. Regular check-ups with a primary care physician (PCP) are often the first line of defense. PCPs are crucial for screening, identifying potential risk factors (smoking history, environmental exposures), and ordering initial diagnostic tests. The physical proximity of primary care practices to residents is another factor. Are practices easily accessible by public transportation, or are they located in areas that are difficult to reach for those with mobility issues? The number of PCPs accepting new patients and the average wait times for appointments also significantly impact the "Lung Cancer Score."

Identifying standout practices within 16725 is crucial. Some practices may excel in early detection through aggressive screening programs, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals. Others may have established strong relationships with pulmonologists and oncologists, ensuring seamless referrals and coordinated care. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials or offer access to cutting-edge treatments would also be considered high-performing. Reviews from patients and data on patient outcomes, if available, would further inform this assessment.

Telemedicine adoption plays a vital role in improving access to care, especially in rural areas like Custer City. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially expediting the diagnosis and treatment process. The availability of telehealth consultations for pulmonology, oncology, and mental health services is particularly relevant. The integration of telehealth into existing primary care practices, coupled with patient education on how to utilize these resources, is essential.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical for individuals diagnosed with lung cancer. The emotional and psychological toll of a cancer diagnosis is significant, and access to counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care is paramount. The "Lung Cancer Score" must consider the availability of mental health professionals in the area, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists. The ability of these professionals to work collaboratively with oncologists and other healthcare providers is another important factor. The availability of support groups specifically for lung cancer patients and their families can also significantly improve quality of life.

The assessment of the "Lung Cancer Score" also considers the availability of smoking cessation programs. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, and access to effective cessation programs is a crucial component of preventative care. The availability of these programs, including counseling, medication, and support groups, can have a significant impact on reducing lung cancer incidence.

The evaluation of the "Lung Cancer Score" is not a static process. It requires continuous monitoring and improvement. Regular updates on physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources are necessary. The "Lung Cancer Score" should also reflect changes in treatment guidelines, technological advancements, and patient outcomes.

The availability of specialized care, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, is another key component. The number of specialists in the area, their expertise, and their affiliations with hospitals and cancer centers are crucial factors. The proximity of these specialists to patients and the ease of referral from primary care physicians are also important.

The infrastructure supporting lung cancer care, such as diagnostic imaging facilities (CT scanners, PET scanners), radiation therapy centers, and chemotherapy infusion centers, is also considered. The availability of these resources within a reasonable distance from patients is crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment.

The "Lung Cancer Score" also considers the availability of patient navigation services. Patient navigators help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, from diagnosis to treatment and beyond. They provide support, education, and advocacy, and can help patients access the resources they need.

Finally, the "Lung Cancer Score" considers the level of patient education and awareness in the community. Public health campaigns, educational materials, and community outreach programs can help raise awareness about lung cancer risk factors, symptoms, and screening options. This education can empower individuals to take proactive steps to protect their health.

For a visual representation of these factors, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and resource availability, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide an interactive, data-driven overview of the healthcare landscape in 16725, helping you understand the complex interplay of factors that contribute to the "Lung Cancer Score."