The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 16726, Cyclone, Pennsylvania is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.97 percent of the residents in 16726 has some form of health insurance. 54.93 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16726 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 101 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16726. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 90 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 433 health care providers accessible to residents in 16726, Cyclone, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16726, Cyclone, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 34 |
---|---|
People Score | 65 |
Provider Score | 29 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 27 |
16726 | Cyclone | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 16726 and Primary Care Availability in Cyclone
This analysis evaluates the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 16726, focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer care, and extrapolates considerations for primary care availability in the hypothetical locale of Cyclone. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of resource accessibility, quality of care, and potential areas for improvement. This assessment is designed to be informative, not a definitive ranking.
ZIP Code 16726, representing a specific geographic area, likely presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities in healthcare. The primary indicator of lung cancer care effectiveness begins with the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). PCPs are crucial for early detection, screening, and referral to specialists. A low PCP-to-patient ratio suggests potential difficulties in accessing timely care, which is a critical element in lung cancer prognosis. This ratio needs to be considered alongside the age demographics of the population within 16726; a higher proportion of older adults, for instance, would likely increase the demand for primary care services and, consequently, impact the ability to detect and treat lung cancer.
The presence of pulmonologists and oncologists within or near 16726 is paramount. These specialists are essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and ongoing management of lung cancer. The proximity of these specialists, as well as the availability of advanced diagnostic tools like CT scanners and PET scanners, directly impacts the speed and efficacy of treatment. The quality of these specialists, as determined by their experience, board certifications, and patient outcomes, is another critical factor. Assessing their affiliations with hospitals and cancer centers can provide insight into the resources available to them.
Standout practices within 16726, or the broader region, could be identified by their patient-centered approach, their commitment to evidence-based medicine, and their integration of innovative technologies. These practices might offer comprehensive lung cancer screening programs, patient navigation services, and support groups. They might also demonstrate a strong commitment to patient education and shared decision-making. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) and the interoperability of these systems can significantly improve care coordination and communication between different healthcare providers, which is essential for managing a complex disease like lung cancer.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural or underserved areas. Telemedicine can improve access to specialists, provide remote monitoring of patients, and offer virtual support groups. The availability of reliable internet access and the willingness of both patients and providers to embrace telemedicine are key determinants of its effectiveness. Assessing the extent to which practices in 16726 utilize telemedicine, and the types of services offered, is crucial.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of cancer care, but they are essential. A lung cancer diagnosis can have a significant impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. Access to mental health professionals, support groups, and other resources can help patients cope with the stress, anxiety, and depression associated with the disease. The availability of these resources within 16726, or in nearby areas, is a critical factor in assessing the overall quality of care.
Extrapolating these considerations to primary care availability in Cyclone, a hypothetical location, requires careful thought. If Cyclone is a rural area with limited resources, the PCP-to-patient ratio is likely to be a significant concern. The distance to specialists and advanced diagnostic facilities would also be a major challenge. The adoption of telemedicine would be particularly important in this context, as it could help bridge the gap in access to care. The availability of mental health resources would also be crucial, given the potential for social isolation and limited support networks in a rural setting.
Furthermore, the presence of community health initiatives and partnerships between healthcare providers, local organizations, and public health agencies can significantly improve lung cancer care. These initiatives might include public awareness campaigns, smoking cessation programs, and screening programs. The level of community engagement and the availability of social support services are also important considerations.
The overall 'Lung Cancer Score' for 16726 and the extrapolated assessment for Cyclone would be a composite of these factors. The analysis would consider the availability of primary care, the presence of specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of community health initiatives. The score would reflect the overall accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of care available to patients with or at risk of lung cancer.
This analysis highlights the complex interplay of factors that influence the quality of lung cancer care. It underscores the importance of a comprehensive approach that considers not only the medical aspects of the disease but also the social, economic, and psychological needs of patients. The goal is to provide a framework for understanding the healthcare landscape and identifying areas for improvement.
To further visualize and analyze the healthcare landscape in 16726 and beyond, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping and data visualization tools that can help you identify patterns, trends, and disparities in healthcare access and quality. Explore the possibilities of CartoChrome to gain deeper insights into the healthcare environment and make informed decisions about healthcare planning and resource allocation.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like