The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17003, Annville, Pennsylvania is 91 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.79 percent of the residents in 17003 has some form of health insurance. 29.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.43 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17003 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,348 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 41 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17003. An estimate of 14 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,411 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 13,137 health care providers accessible to residents in 17003, Annville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17003, Annville, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 77 |
---|---|
People Score | 28 |
Provider Score | 91 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 57 |
17003 | Annville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 17003, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, a crucial element in early detection and management of this disease. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all factors that contribute to a comprehensive lung cancer care score. This score, though not a formal, standardized metric, provides a nuanced understanding of the resources available to residents of Annville, Pennsylvania.
Annville, Pennsylvania, presents a unique challenge when assessing healthcare accessibility. A primarily rural community, it faces the common hurdles of physician shortages and limited access to specialized care. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. While precise figures fluctuate, the general trend in rural areas like Annville often reveals a lower number of primary care physicians per capita compared to more urban settings. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. The impact is magnified for individuals who may face transportation challenges or have limited mobility.
Standout practices within the area are key to mitigating the limitations of a rural healthcare landscape. The presence of practices that prioritize preventative care, including robust screening programs for lung cancer, significantly elevates the overall care score. These practices often have a proactive approach, reaching out to high-risk patients, such as current or former smokers, to encourage screening and early intervention. Furthermore, practices that offer a multidisciplinary approach, coordinating care between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists, contribute to a more streamlined and effective treatment pathway.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments or initial consultations, can greatly improve access to care, especially for those living in remote areas or facing mobility limitations. Telemedicine also allows patients to connect with specialists who may not be readily available in the immediate vicinity. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, ensuring secure and user-friendly access for their patients, are likely to receive a higher score in this analysis. The successful integration of telemedicine requires not only the technology itself but also adequate training for both physicians and patients to ensure effective communication and care delivery.
The provision of mental health resources is an often-overlooked but crucial element of lung cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis, and its subsequent treatment, can have a significant impact on a patient's emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges are common. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health professionals, either in-house or through referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The integration of mental health services can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and overall quality of life.
Evaluating the availability of these resources is not a simple task. It requires gathering data from various sources, including local hospitals, clinics, physician directories, and patient reviews. Information on physician-to-patient ratios can be obtained from state and federal health agencies. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine involves examining practice websites and patient testimonials. The presence of mental health services can be determined by reviewing practice brochures and confirming referral networks.
The overall lung cancer care score for doctors in ZIP code 17003 would be a composite measure, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare infrastructure. A high score would indicate a robust system, with a sufficient number of primary care physicians, proactive screening programs, accessible telemedicine options, and readily available mental health support. A lower score would suggest areas for improvement, such as physician shortages, limited screening programs, and a lack of mental health resources.
The specifics of the score would depend on the data collected. For example, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with a robust screening program and accessible telemedicine, would likely receive a higher score than a practice with a lower ratio but limited resources. The availability of mental health services would also be a significant factor, influencing the overall assessment.
In conclusion, the lung cancer care landscape in Annville, Pennsylvania, presents both opportunities and challenges. The availability of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources are all critical factors in determining the quality of care available to residents. A comprehensive assessment, taking into account these factors, is essential for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that individuals diagnosed with lung cancer receive the best possible care.
To gain a visual understanding of the Annville healthcare landscape, including the location of practices, the availability of resources, and potential areas for improvement, explore CartoChrome maps. These maps can help you visualize the data, identify areas with limited access to care, and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like