The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17210, Amberson, Pennsylvania is 67 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 17210 has some form of health insurance. 26.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17210 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 55 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 7 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17210. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 41 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,398 health care providers accessible to residents in 17210, Amberson, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17210, Amberson, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 93 |
---|---|
People Score | 99 |
Provider Score | 67 |
Hospital Score | 65 |
Travel Score | 41 |
17210 | Amberson | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 17210 & Amberson Primary Care
This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 17210, focusing on physician accessibility, practice quality, and resource availability, while also considering the primary care environment in the nearby area of Amberson. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare ecosystem relevant to lung cancer patients and those at risk.
ZIP code 17210, encompassing Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, presents a specific set of challenges and opportunities regarding lung cancer care. The availability of qualified physicians, particularly pulmonologists and oncologists, is a crucial determinant of patient outcomes. Evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio within this area is a key starting point. National averages can serve as a benchmark, but local factors, such as the prevalence of smoking and the age distribution of the population, can significantly influence the demand for these specialists. A lower physician-to-patient ratio might indicate a greater strain on existing resources, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to specialized care.
The quality of care extends beyond simple availability. The presence of standout practices, those demonstrating a commitment to excellence in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management, is essential. This involves assessing factors like the use of advanced diagnostic technologies, such as low-dose CT scans for early detection, and the implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols. Examining the facilities’ affiliations with major cancer centers or research institutions can also provide insights into the quality of care, as these affiliations often facilitate access to cutting-edge treatments and clinical trials.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in assessing the quality and accessibility of lung cancer care. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations to access specialist consultations and follow-up appointments. The availability of telehealth services, particularly for pulmonary and oncology consultations, can significantly improve patient convenience and reduce the burden of travel, especially for those undergoing treatment. Assessing the adoption rate of telemedicine within practices in 17210 and its surrounding areas is therefore a key aspect of this analysis.
The emotional and psychological toll of a lung cancer diagnosis and treatment cannot be overstated. The availability of mental health resources, including access to therapists, support groups, and psychiatric services, is a crucial component of comprehensive care. Evaluating the integration of mental health services within oncology practices and the availability of these resources within the community is essential. This includes assessing whether practices offer on-site counseling services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals specializing in cancer care.
Primary care availability in Amberson, a nearby community, plays an indirect but important role in lung cancer care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms suggestive of lung cancer. The accessibility of PCPs in Amberson, including their appointment availability and the comprehensiveness of their services, can influence the timeliness of diagnosis and referral to specialists. A robust primary care system, with PCPs actively involved in screening and early detection, can contribute to improved patient outcomes.
Specific practices within 17210 warrant closer examination. Identifying those that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive lung cancer care, including early detection, advanced treatment options, and patient support services, is crucial. This involves researching individual practices, reviewing patient testimonials, and assessing their accreditations and affiliations. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials or have a strong focus on patient education and support are likely to offer a higher level of care.
The analysis should also consider the presence of community resources, such as support groups, patient advocacy organizations, and educational programs. These resources can provide vital support to patients and their families, helping them navigate the challenges of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. Assessing the availability and accessibility of these resources within 17210 is an important aspect of the overall assessment.
The economic factors influencing lung cancer care cannot be ignored. The cost of treatment, including diagnostic tests, medications, and physician visits, can be a significant burden for patients. Assessing the availability of financial assistance programs, such as those offered by pharmaceutical companies or cancer support organizations, is important. The acceptance of various insurance plans by local practices also influences the accessibility of care.
Furthermore, the role of public health initiatives in promoting lung cancer awareness and prevention should be considered. This includes assessing the effectiveness of local smoking cessation programs and the implementation of public health campaigns aimed at educating the public about the risks of lung cancer and the importance of early detection.
In conclusion, a comprehensive lung cancer score analysis for ZIP code 17210 necessitates a multifaceted approach. It requires a detailed assessment of physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the primary care environment in Amberson. The analysis should also consider community resources, economic factors, and public health initiatives. This holistic approach provides a more complete picture of the healthcare landscape and identifies areas where improvements are needed to enhance patient outcomes.
For a visual representation of the data and a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent the physician-to-patient ratios, practice locations, and resource availability, providing a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Visit CartoChrome to learn more about how these maps can provide a clearer picture of lung cancer care in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like