The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17254, Scotland, Pennsylvania is 46 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 79.28 percent of the residents in 17254 has some form of health insurance. 54.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17254 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 50 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17254. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 242 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,210 health care providers accessible to residents in 17254, Scotland, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17254, Scotland, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 90 |
---|---|
People Score | 89 |
Provider Score | 46 |
Hospital Score | 83 |
Travel Score | 43 |
17254 | Scotland | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 17254 & Scotland
This analysis provides a comparative "Lung Cancer Score" assessment, evaluating the landscape of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and patient support in two distinct geographical areas: ZIP Code 17254 (a specific US location) and the entirety of Scotland. The score is not a single number, but rather a qualitative assessment based on several key factors, including primary care access, physician-to-patient ratios, adoption of innovative technologies, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial components in the fight against lung cancer.
**ZIP Code 17254: A Microcosm of US Healthcare**
ZIP Code 17254, which we will assume to be a representative US area, likely faces challenges common to many regions. Primary care availability is a critical starting point. The Lung Cancer Score for this area is heavily influenced by the ease with which residents can access a primary care physician (PCP). This is the gateway to early detection through screenings and referrals. The US healthcare system, with its complexities of insurance and provider networks, often presents barriers. The score will be impacted by factors such as the number of PCPs per capita, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the wait times for appointments. Areas with a shortage of PCPs, or those with high patient-to-physician ratios, will receive a lower score in this category.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a significant indicator. A high ratio, meaning fewer doctors per resident, can lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment. This is particularly detrimental in lung cancer, where early intervention is vital. The analysis will consider the availability of specialists, including pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. The concentration of these specialists in or near 17254 will directly impact the score. The presence of a comprehensive cancer center, with multidisciplinary teams and access to cutting-edge treatments, will significantly boost the score.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and access specialists through telehealth platforms can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. The score will reflect the extent to which practices in 17254 have embraced telemedicine, including the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and online patient portals.
Mental health resources are often overlooked, yet they are essential for patients dealing with a lung cancer diagnosis. The score will assess the availability of mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services specifically tailored to cancer patients and their families. Access to these resources can significantly improve a patient's quality of life and their ability to cope with the emotional and psychological challenges of the disease. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan will be viewed favorably.
Standout practices within 17254, if any, will be identified. These practices may be recognized for their commitment to early detection, patient-centered care, innovative treatment approaches, or exceptional patient support. The analysis will highlight any practices that have implemented best practices in lung cancer care, such as offering smoking cessation programs, promoting lung cancer screenings, or participating in clinical trials. These practices will positively influence the overall score.
**Scotland: A National Healthcare System Perspective**
Scotland's National Health Service (NHS) presents a different healthcare landscape. The Lung Cancer Score for Scotland will be evaluated based on the NHS's structure, accessibility, and the resources available across the country. Primary care availability is a cornerstone of the NHS. The score will reflect the ease with which Scottish residents can access a GP (General Practitioner), who serves as the first point of contact for healthcare needs. The geographic distribution of GPs, waiting times, and the overall efficiency of the primary care system will be carefully considered.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Scotland will be analyzed at a national level. The analysis will assess the availability of specialists, including pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, and their distribution across the country. The presence of specialized cancer centers, with access to advanced treatments and research, will be a major factor in determining the score. The NHS's commitment to early detection and screening programs, such as the National Lung Screening Programme, will also be a significant factor.
Telemedicine adoption within the NHS will be evaluated. The score will reflect the extent to which telemedicine is used to improve access to care, particularly in remote or underserved areas. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals. The NHS's investment in digital healthcare infrastructure will be a key indicator.
Mental health resources are an integral part of the NHS. The score will assess the availability of mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services specifically tailored to cancer patients and their families. The integration of mental health services into the overall cancer care pathway will be viewed favorably. The NHS's commitment to providing comprehensive psychological support will positively impact the score.
The analysis will consider the overall performance of the NHS in lung cancer care, including survival rates, treatment outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Any regional variations in access to care or treatment outcomes will be noted. The implementation of national guidelines and protocols for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment will also be assessed.
**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**
Comparing the two areas, we can expect significant differences. 17254, representing a US area, might struggle with access issues due to insurance complexities and physician shortages. Scotland, with its nationalized healthcare system, may have better access to primary care and specialists, but potentially face challenges related to geographic disparities and resource allocation within the NHS.
The Lung Cancer Score for both areas will be a reflection of the factors discussed above. While a precise numerical score is impossible without detailed data, the qualitative assessment will provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each healthcare system in relation to lung cancer care.
This analysis highlights the complexities of healthcare access and the importance of comprehensive care for lung cancer patients. Understanding the landscape of available resources is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers.
**Call to Action**
For a more in-depth visualization of these healthcare landscapes and to explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can provide a visual representation of the data discussed in this analysis, allowing for a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment in both 17254 and Scotland. Explore CartoChrome maps to gain a more comprehensive understanding of healthcare resources and their impact on lung cancer care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like