17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.48 percent of the residents in 17311 has some form of health insurance. 45.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17311 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17311. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 54 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,982 health care providers accessible to residents in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania.

This analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score assessment for physicians practicing within ZIP Code 17311, with a specific focus on primary care accessibility in Codorus, Pennsylvania. The score considers several key factors influencing lung cancer detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being. This is a hypothetical assessment, utilizing publicly available data and assuming certain parameters for evaluation.

The core of the Lung Cancer Score revolves around the principle that early detection is paramount. Access to quality primary care, particularly for individuals at high risk (smokers, former smokers, those with family history), significantly impacts the likelihood of timely diagnosis. The analysis examines physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of screening services, and the integration of comprehensive care models.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. A high ratio (fewer physicians per capita) can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and follow-up care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data from publicly available sources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), are utilized to estimate the physician-to-patient ratio within the 17311 ZIP Code and the Codorus area. This data is then compared to national and state averages to gauge relative access.

Standout practices are identified through a multi-faceted approach. This includes examining online patient reviews, assessing the availability of advanced diagnostic tools (e.g., low-dose CT scanners for lung cancer screening), and evaluating the adoption of evidence-based practices. Practices actively participating in lung cancer screening programs, adhering to national guidelines, and demonstrating a commitment to patient education receive higher scores. The analysis also considers the presence of multidisciplinary teams, including pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons, which are essential for comprehensive lung cancer care.

Telemedicine adoption is another key element. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication management, enhances patient convenience and reduces barriers to care. Practices with robust telemedicine programs, including secure video conferencing and patient portals, are recognized for their commitment to accessibility and patient-centered care. The analysis evaluates the availability of telemedicine services for both primary care and specialist consultations related to lung health.

Mental health resources are often overlooked, yet they are vital for patients facing a lung cancer diagnosis. The emotional and psychological impact of the disease can be significant, and access to mental health support is crucial for patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans. The analysis assesses the availability of on-site or referral-based mental health services within primary care practices and the broader Codorus healthcare ecosystem. This includes evaluating the presence of social workers, therapists, and support groups.

Primary care availability in Codorus is a central focus. The analysis assesses the number of primary care physicians serving the Codorus population, considering factors such as geographic distribution and appointment availability. The proximity of primary care practices to Codorus residents is evaluated, recognizing that convenient access is essential for early detection and preventative care. The analysis also considers the availability of evening and weekend appointments, which can improve access for working individuals.

The Lung Cancer Score is not a static measure. It is a dynamic assessment that evolves with changes in healthcare practices, technological advancements, and the availability of resources. This analysis provides a snapshot of the current landscape, highlighting areas of strength and areas where improvement is needed. The score is designed to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the quality of lung cancer care in the 17311 ZIP Code and the Codorus area.

The analysis considers the availability of smoking cessation programs. Primary care physicians play a critical role in helping patients quit smoking, which is the leading cause of lung cancer. The analysis assesses the availability of these programs, including counseling, medication, and support groups, within primary care practices. Practices actively promoting smoking cessation receive higher scores.

The analysis evaluates the integration of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs streamline communication between healthcare providers, improve care coordination, and facilitate the tracking of patient data. Practices with robust EHR systems, including the ability to share information with specialists and access patient histories, receive higher scores.

The analysis considers the availability of patient education materials. Empowering patients with knowledge about lung cancer, screening guidelines, and treatment options is crucial for informed decision-making. Practices providing patient education materials, such as brochures, websites, and educational sessions, receive higher scores.

The analysis examines the presence of patient navigators. Patient navigators assist patients in navigating the complex healthcare system, providing support and guidance throughout their cancer journey. Practices with patient navigators receive higher scores, recognizing the value of this service.

The analysis assesses the availability of financial assistance programs. Lung cancer treatment can be expensive, and financial barriers can prevent patients from accessing necessary care. Practices providing information about financial assistance programs receive higher scores.

The analysis considers the integration of palliative care services. Palliative care focuses on improving the quality of life for patients with serious illnesses, providing pain and symptom management, and addressing emotional and spiritual needs. Practices offering palliative care services receive higher scores.

The analysis considers the overall accessibility of care. This includes factors such as transportation options, language services, and cultural sensitivity. Practices that prioritize accessibility receive higher scores.

The Lung Cancer Score is a comprehensive assessment, incorporating a wide range of factors that influence the quality of lung cancer care. It is designed to provide a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, helping them to make informed decisions and improve outcomes. The score is intended to be a starting point for further investigation and should not be considered a definitive ranking.

The assessment process involves collecting data from various sources, including publicly available databases, healthcare provider websites, and patient reviews. The data is then analyzed and weighted according to its importance. The final score is a composite measure, reflecting the overall quality of lung cancer care in the 17311 ZIP Code and the Codorus area. The weighting of each factor is based on evidence-based guidelines and expert opinion.

The analysis utilizes a standardized scoring system, allowing for comparisons across different practices and geographic areas. The scoring system is transparent and reproducible, ensuring the reliability of the assessment. The analysis is regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare practices and technological advancements.

The analysis acknowledges that this is a hypothetical assessment, based on publicly available data and certain assumptions. The accuracy of the score depends on the availability and reliability of the data. The analysis is intended to provide a general overview of the quality of lung cancer care and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice.

The Lung Cancer Score is a valuable tool for improving lung cancer care. By identifying areas of strength and weakness, the score can help healthcare providers to improve their practices and patients to make informed decisions about their care. The score can also be used to advocate for policy changes that support lung cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment.

To gain a visual understanding of physician locations, primary care availability, and other relevant data points within the 17311 ZIP Code and the Codorus area, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide interactive visualizations that can help you understand the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about your health.