17356, Red Lion, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17356, Red Lion, Pennsylvania is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.55 percent of the residents in 17356 has some form of health insurance. 30.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.06 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17356 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 5,215 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17356. An estimate of 43 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,615 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 13,478 health care providers accessible to residents in 17356, Red Lion, Pennsylvania.

This analysis provides a nuanced perspective on lung cancer care within Red Lion, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 17356), focusing on primary care availability and related resources. It aims to offer a ‘Lung Cancer Score’ assessment, considering various factors crucial for patient well-being and successful treatment outcomes. The goal is to illuminate the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape, enabling informed decisions for both patients and healthcare providers.

The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests heavily on accessible and robust primary care. Early detection is paramount, and primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact. Their ability to identify potential symptoms, order screenings, and refer patients to specialists significantly impacts survival rates. In Red Lion, the availability of PCPs is a critical determinant of the Lung Cancer Score. Physician-to-patient ratios become a key metric. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can strain resources and potentially lead to delayed diagnoses or reduced follow-up care. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and publicly available databases would need to be analyzed to ascertain the current ratio within the 17356 ZIP code.

Beyond sheer numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are practices concentrated in specific areas, leaving others underserved? Are there barriers to access, such as transportation challenges or limited insurance acceptance? The Lung Cancer Score must account for these disparities, recognizing that equal access is not always a reality. Furthermore, the type of primary care offered is relevant. Do practices offer comprehensive services, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and behavioral health integration? Practices that prioritize these elements are likely to contribute positively to the Lung Cancer Score.

Identifying standout practices within Red Lion is essential. These are the clinics and individual physicians who demonstrate excellence in patient care, particularly concerning lung cancer risk factors and early detection. This requires evaluating several factors: Do they actively promote smoking cessation programs? Do they adhere to current screening guidelines for high-risk individuals? Do they have established referral pathways to pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists? Practices that excel in these areas should receive recognition for their commitment to patient well-being.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural or underserved areas. The ability to offer virtual consultations and remote monitoring can improve access to care, reduce travel burdens, and facilitate timely interventions. The Lung Cancer Score should reflect the level of telemedicine integration within Red Lion's primary care practices. Are virtual appointments readily available? Do physicians utilize remote monitoring devices to track patient health? Practices that embrace telemedicine are likely to improve the overall Lung Cancer Score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical for lung cancer patients. A diagnosis of lung cancer can be devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. The availability of mental health support within primary care practices or through referrals is an essential component of comprehensive care. The Lung Cancer Score must assess the integration of mental health services. Do practices screen for mental health issues? Do they have access to therapists, counselors, or psychiatrists who specialize in oncology? Practices that prioritize mental well-being will contribute positively to the score.

The availability of support groups, patient education programs, and community resources also impacts the Lung Cancer Score. These resources empower patients, provide emotional support, and help them navigate the complexities of treatment and recovery. The score should reflect the presence and accessibility of these resources within Red Lion. Are there local support groups for lung cancer patients and their families? Do primary care practices offer patient education materials? Collaboration with local organizations can significantly improve the Lung Cancer Score.

The Lung Cancer Score must also consider the role of specialists. While primary care is the foundation, access to pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. The score should assess the proximity of these specialists to Red Lion, the ease of referral processes, and the quality of communication between primary care physicians and specialists. A well-coordinated network of healthcare providers is essential for optimal patient outcomes.

The quality of healthcare infrastructure, including the availability of diagnostic equipment, treatment facilities, and supportive care services, also plays a role. The Lung Cancer Score should consider the presence of CT scanners, radiation therapy facilities, and other essential resources within or near Red Lion. Access to these resources is crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment.

The Lung Cancer Score is a dynamic assessment. Regular updates are necessary to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as new physician arrivals, telemedicine adoption, or the establishment of new support programs. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that the score remains relevant and provides an accurate reflection of the quality of lung cancer care in Red Lion.

In conclusion, assessing the ‘Lung Cancer Score’ for Red Lion (17356) requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, assessing mental health resources, and examining the availability of support services and specialist care. By considering these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and identify areas for improvement.

To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, specialist availability, and support services, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, making it easier to identify areas with limited access and areas with robust resources. Visit CartoChrome today to explore the healthcare landscape of Red Lion and beyond.