Lung Cancer Score

17517, Denver, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania is 72 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.31 percent of the residents in 17517 has some form of health insurance. 28.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17517 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,958 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17517. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,151 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,946 health care providers accessible to residents in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania

Lung Cancer Score 71
People Score 33
Provider Score 72
Hospital Score 43
Travel Score 75

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

17517 Denver Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: 17517 & Denver Primary Care

This analysis provides a comparative assessment of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer care, focusing on two distinct geographic areas: doctors practicing within the 17517 ZIP code (Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania) and the availability of primary care in Denver, Colorado. The evaluation considers factors impacting early detection, treatment access, and overall patient well-being. This is not an exhaustive medical review, and the information presented is for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice.

**17517: Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania - A Local Perspective**

Elizabethtown, a primarily suburban community, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities in the context of lung cancer care. The key consideration is access to specialized medical expertise. The limited size of the town suggests a potential scarcity of pulmonologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons within the immediate vicinity. This necessitates a reliance on referral networks to larger medical centers, such as those in Lancaster or Harrisburg.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. In 17517, the density of specialists, particularly those directly involved in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, is likely lower than in more urban settings. This can translate to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial diagnostic procedures like CT scans and biopsies. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is also vital. PCPs serve as the initial point of contact, crucial for early screening, symptom identification, and referrals to specialists. The ratio of PCPs to the population in Elizabethtown directly influences the accessibility of preventative care and early detection efforts.

Standout practices, if any, in Elizabethtown would be those demonstrating a commitment to proactive lung cancer screening programs. This includes offering low-dose CT scans to eligible patients, educating the community about risk factors (smoking history, radon exposure), and actively promoting smoking cessation programs. Such practices distinguish themselves by prioritizing preventative care and patient education. The presence of a dedicated oncology support group or patient navigator program would also be a significant advantage, providing emotional and practical support throughout the treatment journey.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. The ability to conduct virtual consultations with specialists, particularly for follow-up appointments or second opinions, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients who may have difficulty traveling to larger medical centers. The availability of telemedicine platforms and the willingness of local physicians to utilize them are important factors to consider.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are integral to comprehensive cancer care. The emotional toll of a lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be immense. The availability of local therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in oncology is a vital component of a well-rounded healthcare system. The presence of these resources can significantly impact patient well-being and their ability to cope with the challenges of the disease.

**Denver, Colorado: Primary Care Landscape and Broader Access**

Denver, a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of circumstances concerning lung cancer care. The larger population and the presence of major medical institutions generally translate to a greater concentration of specialists and advanced treatment options. However, the sheer size of the city can also create challenges, such as navigating a complex healthcare system and finding the right resources.

Primary care availability is paramount in Denver. The number of PCPs per capita directly influences access to preventative screenings and early detection. A robust primary care network is crucial for identifying potential lung cancer cases early, when treatment options are most effective. The availability of same-day appointments, extended hours, and walk-in clinics can significantly improve access to care, particularly for individuals experiencing concerning symptoms.

The physician-to-patient ratio in Denver, while likely better than in a smaller community like Elizabethtown, still warrants careful examination. The distribution of specialists across the city and the potential for long wait times for appointments are important factors to consider. The presence of specialized lung cancer centers, offering comprehensive diagnostic and treatment services under one roof, can streamline the patient journey and improve outcomes.

Standout practices in Denver would be those demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based lung cancer screening programs, particularly for high-risk populations (smokers, former smokers). This includes offering low-dose CT scans, providing smoking cessation support, and actively participating in research and clinical trials. Practices that prioritize patient education and shared decision-making are also highly valued.

Telemedicine adoption in Denver is likely more prevalent than in a smaller community. The ability to conduct virtual consultations with specialists, access remote monitoring tools, and receive online support can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients living in outlying areas or those with mobility limitations.

Mental health resources are equally important in Denver. The availability of oncology-specific therapists, support groups, and mental health services within the healthcare system is crucial. The integration of mental health professionals into the cancer care team can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life. The presence of these resources is a strong indicator of a comprehensive and patient-centered approach to care.

**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**

Comparing the two locations, Denver likely offers a broader range of specialized resources and treatment options for lung cancer. However, access to care can still be a challenge due to the size and complexity of the city. Elizabethtown, while potentially limited in local resources, can leverage referral networks to access specialized care in nearby cities. The focus in both areas should be on improving early detection through screening programs, promoting smoking cessation, and ensuring access to comprehensive mental health support.

Understanding the geographical distribution of healthcare resources is crucial for patients and healthcare providers alike. CartoChrome maps can be a valuable tool in visualizing the availability of specialists, primary care physicians, and other relevant resources in both 17517 and Denver. By visualizing this data, patients can make more informed decisions about their healthcare, and providers can identify areas where resources are needed most.

**Take action: Explore CartoChrome maps to visualize healthcare resources in your area and gain a deeper understanding of lung cancer care access.**

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania

You may also like

17522, Ephrata, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 5.31 Miles

Total Population:

17507, Bowmansville, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 5.77 Miles

Total Population:

17519, East Earl, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 7.36 Miles

Total Population:

17501, Akron, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 7.68 Miles

Total Population:

17557, New Holland, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 9.01 Miles

Total Population:

17508, Brownstown, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 9.12 Miles

Total Population:

17540, Leola, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 10.18 Miles

Total Population:

17555, Narvon, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 10.73 Miles

Total Population:

17543, Lititz, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score
Lung Cancer Score

Distance from 17517: 11.29 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania