The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17727, Cedar Run, Pennsylvania is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 17727 has some form of health insurance. 86.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17727 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17727. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 19 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 9 health care providers accessible to residents in 17727, Cedar Run, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17727, Cedar Run, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 76 |
---|---|
People Score | 97 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 70 |
Travel Score | 16 |
17727 | Cedar Run | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 17727, focusing on physician availability, primary care access in Cedar Run, and related resources. This evaluation aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare ecosystem, considering factors beyond simple physician counts.
The primary concern in evaluating lung cancer care is early detection and timely intervention. This hinges on access to primary care physicians (PCPs) who can facilitate screening, order diagnostic tests, and coordinate specialist referrals. In Cedar Run, the availability of PCPs directly impacts the community’s ability to combat lung cancer effectively. A limited number of PCPs, or those with restricted appointment availability, can create significant barriers to care. Patients may face delays in diagnosis, potentially leading to poorer outcomes. Conversely, a robust PCP network, with readily accessible appointments, fosters a proactive approach to lung cancer prevention and treatment.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating a large patient population per physician, can strain resources and limit the time each patient receives. In ZIP Code 17727, and specifically in the context of Cedar Run, this ratio needs careful consideration. A low physician-to-patient ratio in primary care is a positive indicator. It suggests that patients are more likely to receive prompt attention and personalized care, which is crucial for early detection and management of lung cancer. Conversely, a high ratio necessitates examining strategies to enhance access, such as leveraging telemedicine or expanding the healthcare workforce.
Standout practices within the area can serve as benchmarks for quality and innovation. Identifying practices that excel in areas such as patient education, screening protocols, and referral management is essential. These practices often implement best practices, such as utilizing evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening and offering comprehensive patient support services. Examining their operational models, including appointment scheduling, communication strategies, and care coordination processes, can provide valuable insights for other providers. It's important to look for practices that actively participate in community outreach programs to raise awareness about lung cancer risk factors and screening options.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers a significant advantage in rural areas like Cedar Run, where geographic limitations can hinder access to care. Telehealth consultations can provide patients with convenient access to specialists, including pulmonologists and oncologists, without requiring extensive travel. The availability of remote monitoring tools can also facilitate ongoing patient management and early detection of complications. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption within the 17727 ZIP Code, including the types of services offered and the patient population served, is crucial. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies are better positioned to provide timely and accessible care.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but play a vital role in lung cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. Access to mental health services, including counseling and support groups, is essential for addressing anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Evaluating the availability of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the integration of mental health care into the overall treatment plan is crucial. Practices that prioritize mental health support demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care.
Specific examples of practices that excel in lung cancer care in the 17727 ZIP Code should be sought. These practices may have implemented innovative screening programs, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for high-risk individuals. They might have established strong referral networks with pulmonologists and oncologists, ensuring seamless transitions of care. Furthermore, these practices might actively engage in patient education, providing resources and support to help patients understand their diagnosis, treatment options, and potential side effects. Their commitment to patient-centered care serves as a model for other providers in the area.
The assessment of primary care availability in Cedar Run should consider the geographic distribution of practices. Are there areas within Cedar Run that lack sufficient access to PCPs? Are transportation barriers a factor for patients seeking care? Understanding these factors is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve access to care. This might involve establishing mobile clinics, expanding telehealth services, or recruiting additional healthcare professionals to serve the community.
The overall quality of lung cancer care in the 17727 ZIP Code is not solely determined by the number of physicians. It also depends on the availability of diagnostic imaging services, such as CT scans and PET scans. The proximity of these services to primary care practices is crucial. Delays in obtaining diagnostic tests can significantly impact patient outcomes. Furthermore, the availability of specialized cancer treatment centers, including radiation therapy and chemotherapy facilities, is a critical factor. Patients should have access to comprehensive cancer care services within a reasonable distance.
The effectiveness of lung cancer care also depends on the degree of collaboration between healthcare providers. Effective communication and care coordination between PCPs, pulmonologists, oncologists, and other specialists are essential. This includes the use of electronic health records (EHRs) to facilitate information sharing and the implementation of standardized care protocols. Practices that prioritize collaboration are better equipped to provide seamless and coordinated care.
In conclusion, the assessment of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 17727 and the primary care availability in Cedar Run requires a multifaceted approach. Evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and evaluating mental health resources are all critical factors. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem and identify opportunities to improve access to care and patient outcomes.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in the 17727 ZIP Code, including physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and demographic data, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing healthcare data, providing valuable insights for patients, providers, and policymakers alike.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like