17881, Trevorton, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17881, Trevorton, Pennsylvania is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.05 percent of the residents in 17881 has some form of health insurance. 45.05 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17881 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 289 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17881. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 309 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,096 health care providers accessible to residents in 17881, Trevorton, Pennsylvania.

The task of assessing and ranking medical professionals, particularly concerning a complex disease like lung cancer, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on the availability of primary care physicians and related resources within ZIP code 17881 (Trevorton, Pennsylvania), aiming to provide a "Lung Cancer Score" perspective. The evaluation considers factors crucial for early detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support.

Trevorton, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities regarding healthcare access. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A low ratio can signify limited access to primary care, potentially delaying the early detection of lung cancer symptoms. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health must be analyzed to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 17881. This analysis should include all primary care physicians (family medicine, internal medicine, and general practice) actively practicing in the area. A concerningly low ratio would negatively impact the Lung Cancer Score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care provided by existing practices is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several criteria. This includes the availability of advanced diagnostic tools (e.g., low-dose CT scans for lung cancer screening), the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening and treatment, and the presence of a multidisciplinary team. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs, such as smoking cessation initiatives, would also score favorably. Patient reviews and testimonials, while subjective, offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the overall patient experience.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, particularly in rural areas like Trevorton, by providing access to specialists and follow-up care. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for consultations, medication management, and patient education would receive a higher score. The ability to remotely monitor patients' conditions and provide timely interventions can significantly improve outcomes for lung cancer patients. This is especially important for those undergoing treatment or managing chronic conditions.

The psychological impact of a lung cancer diagnosis and treatment is substantial. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a significant component of the Lung Cancer Score. Practices that offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral networks with mental health professionals, would be viewed more positively. Access to support groups, both in-person and online, is also essential. Addressing the emotional and psychological needs of patients can significantly improve their quality of life and adherence to treatment plans.

The Lung Cancer Score, in essence, is a composite measure. It weighs the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by existing practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Each of these factors is assigned a weight based on its relative importance in influencing patient outcomes. The final score would reflect the overall accessibility and quality of care for lung cancer patients in Trevorton.

To conduct a thorough analysis, data collection from various sources is necessary. This includes publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and local hospitals and clinics. Additionally, contacting local practices directly to gather information on their services and resources is essential. Patient advocacy groups and online review platforms can also provide valuable insights.

The analysis of primary care availability in Trevorton necessitates a deep dive into the specifics of the local healthcare landscape. The presence of a hospital or larger clinic in the surrounding area would be a positive factor, as it would likely provide access to specialized care, including pulmonologists and oncologists. The availability of transportation options for patients, especially those with mobility limitations, is also a key consideration.

The Lung Cancer Score, once calculated, would provide a valuable benchmark for assessing the healthcare environment in Trevorton. It could be used by patients to make informed decisions about their care, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively. The score would also highlight the need for ongoing efforts to improve healthcare access and quality in rural communities.

The limitations of this type of analysis should be acknowledged. The Lung Cancer Score is based on available data and may not capture all aspects of the patient experience. The subjective nature of patient reviews and testimonials should be considered. Furthermore, healthcare landscapes are constantly evolving, so the score would need to be updated regularly to remain relevant.

In conclusion, the Lung Cancer Score analysis for Trevorton (ZIP code 17881) requires a comprehensive assessment of primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by existing practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. By considering these factors, a more complete picture of the healthcare environment can be developed, enabling informed decision-making and promoting better patient outcomes.

To gain a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Trevorton and surrounding areas, including the location of practices, hospitals, and specialists, explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a dynamic and informative way to visualize healthcare data, aiding in the understanding of access to care and identifying potential areas for improvement.