17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania is 46 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.61 percent of the residents in 17952 has some form of health insurance. 38.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17952 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 39 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17952. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 49 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 894 health care providers accessible to residents in 17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania.

The following analysis evaluates the landscape of lung cancer care accessibility and quality within ZIP Code 17952, focusing on primary care physician availability and related resources. The assessment considers factors critical to early detection and effective treatment, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, particularly in the context of Mary D.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 17952 presents a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating fewer primary care physicians per capita, can significantly hinder timely access to screening and diagnostic services for lung cancer. This scarcity can lead to delayed diagnoses, impacting patient outcomes. Analyzing the specific ratio within the ZIP code, compared to state and national averages, is crucial. A below-average ratio warrants investigation into the reasons behind it, such as physician shortages, geographic isolation, or the prevalence of chronic conditions that may increase the demand for primary care.

The availability of primary care physicians within Mary D. is of paramount importance. Mary D., as a specific geographic area within the ZIP code, might face unique challenges regarding healthcare access. Factors such as transportation limitations, socioeconomic disparities, and the presence of vulnerable populations can exacerbate existing issues. A detailed examination of the primary care infrastructure in Mary D., including the number of practices, their locations, and the services they offer, is essential.

Identifying standout practices within 17952 is another key aspect of the analysis. These practices may demonstrate exemplary patient care, innovative screening programs, or a strong commitment to early detection and treatment of lung cancer. Evaluating these practices requires a multifaceted approach, including reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, assessing the utilization of evidence-based guidelines, and examining the integration of multidisciplinary care teams. Practices that actively participate in lung cancer screening programs, such as those recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), should be recognized.

Telemedicine adoption within primary care practices in 17952 is a significant factor in evaluating access to care. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, improve patient convenience, and potentially reduce wait times for appointments. The extent of telemedicine utilization, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), should be assessed. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially reach a wider patient population, particularly those in Mary D. who may face transportation or mobility challenges.

The integration of mental health resources into primary care is often overlooked, yet it is a critical component of comprehensive lung cancer care. A lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being. Assessing the availability of mental health services within primary care practices in 17952 is essential. This includes evaluating whether practices offer on-site counseling, referrals to mental health specialists, or educational resources for patients and their families. Practices that prioritize mental health support demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care.

The analysis must consider the specific challenges faced by Mary D. in accessing healthcare. This includes identifying any transportation limitations, language barriers, or cultural sensitivities that may impact patient care. It is crucial to assess whether primary care practices in Mary D. are adequately equipped to address these challenges. This may involve evaluating the availability of bilingual staff, culturally sensitive healthcare materials, and partnerships with community organizations.

The overall Lung Cancer Score for doctors in ZIP Code 17952 would be a composite measure, reflecting the factors discussed above. This score would provide a snapshot of the overall accessibility and quality of lung cancer care in the area. The score should consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. The specific needs of Mary D. should be weighted appropriately.

To derive the score, each factor would be assigned a weighted value based on its importance. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio might be given a higher weight than the adoption of telemedicine. The practices would then be assessed on each factor, and their scores would be combined to produce an overall score. This score could be presented on a scale, allowing for easy comparison of different practices.

The analysis should also consider the presence of any community-based initiatives or programs that support lung cancer screening, early detection, and treatment. This could include partnerships with local hospitals, cancer support groups, or public health organizations. The involvement of primary care practices in these initiatives would be a positive indicator of their commitment to patient care.

The final Lung Cancer Score should be presented in a clear and concise format, accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology and the factors considered. The analysis should also identify areas for improvement, such as the need to increase the physician-to-patient ratio, expand telemedicine adoption, or enhance mental health support. The goal is to provide a comprehensive and actionable assessment of the lung cancer care landscape in 17952.

For a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and patient populations, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps offer a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of the challenges and opportunities in lung cancer care within 17952 and Mary D.