The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 18810, Athens, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.25 percent of the residents in 18810 has some form of health insurance. 37.64 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18810 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,172 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18810. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,324 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,893 health care providers accessible to residents in 18810, Athens, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18810, Athens, Pennsylvania
Lung Cancer Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 23 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 32 |
Travel Score | 59 |
18810 | Athens | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Physicians and Resources in Athens, PA (ZIP Code 18810)**
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment within the Athens, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 18810) area, focusing on primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support. The goal is to provide a comprehensive “Lung Cancer Score” perspective, offering insights for residents and healthcare providers. The absence of specific data necessitates a reliance on general healthcare trends and publicly available information.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests upon accessible and robust primary care. Early detection is crucial, and primary care physicians (PCPs) often serve as the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. In Athens, the availability of PCPs is a critical factor. A low physician-to-patient ratio could indicate limited access, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access, allowing for more timely interventions. Publicly available data on physician counts and population demographics will be essential to determine the actual ratio.
Identifying “standout practices” in Athens requires evaluating several factors. These include the quality of care, patient satisfaction, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Practices that prioritize preventive care, offer comprehensive screening programs (including low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals), and demonstrate a commitment to patient education are likely to score higher. Furthermore, practices with affiliations with larger healthcare systems or hospitals may have access to specialized resources and expertise, potentially improving the overall quality of care.
Telemedicine has emerged as a vital tool in modern healthcare, particularly in rural areas. Its adoption in Athens can significantly impact lung cancer care. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, reducing travel burdens and improving access to expertise. It can also facilitate virtual follow-up appointments, medication management, and support group participation. Practices that actively utilize telemedicine platforms, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring capabilities, demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and access to care.
The psychological impact of a lung cancer diagnosis is profound. Mental health support is an integral part of comprehensive cancer care. Access to mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, is essential for patients coping with the emotional and psychological challenges of the disease. Practices that offer or facilitate access to these resources, whether through in-house services or referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The availability of support groups, both in-person and virtual, further enhances the mental well-being of patients.
Evaluating the overall “Lung Cancer Score” requires a multi-faceted approach. The score should consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. A higher score would indicate a more favorable environment for lung cancer care, with better access to physicians, advanced technologies, and comprehensive support services.
The Athens area's healthcare landscape is likely influenced by its proximity to larger regional centers. Collaboration and referral networks with hospitals and specialists in nearby cities can significantly enhance the quality of care available to Athens residents. Assessing the strength of these networks is an important factor in determining the overall “Lung Cancer Score.”
Public health initiatives and community awareness campaigns also play a crucial role in lung cancer prevention and early detection. Initiatives that promote smoking cessation, encourage regular screenings for high-risk individuals, and educate the public about the signs and symptoms of lung cancer can improve patient outcomes. The presence of these initiatives within the Athens community will contribute to the overall score.
The analysis needs to consider the specific challenges faced by rural communities. These can include limited access to specialized care, transportation difficulties, and socioeconomic disparities. Addressing these challenges requires a proactive approach, including targeted outreach programs, mobile screening units, and financial assistance for patients.
The quality of available diagnostic tools is also crucial. The availability of advanced imaging technologies, such as PET/CT scans, is essential for accurate staging and monitoring of lung cancer. The expertise of radiologists and pathologists in interpreting these scans also significantly impacts patient outcomes.
The availability of clinical trials and research opportunities is another factor to consider. Patients with lung cancer may benefit from participating in clinical trials, which can provide access to innovative treatments and improve outcomes. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials or have affiliations with research institutions are likely to provide a higher level of care.
Patient navigation services can also play a vital role in improving the patient experience. Patient navigators assist patients in navigating the complex healthcare system, coordinating appointments, and providing emotional support. Practices that offer patient navigation services demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care.
The “Lung Cancer Score” is not a static metric. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, including new technologies, treatment options, and community initiatives. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that residents of Athens have access to the best possible lung cancer care.
This analysis, though limited by the absence of specific data, provides a framework for assessing the quality of lung cancer care in Athens, PA. The key elements include physician accessibility, the adoption of technology, mental health support, and the overall quality of care provided by local practices. A comprehensive assessment would require detailed data analysis, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialists, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Athens, PA, and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring interactive maps. CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, hospital affiliations, and other relevant data points.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like