18844, Springville, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 18844, Springville, Pennsylvania is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.51 percent of the residents in 18844 has some form of health insurance. 40.23 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.66 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18844 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 344 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18844. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 443 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 193 health care providers accessible to residents in 18844, Springville, Pennsylvania.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Springville, PA (ZIP Code 18844)

This analysis focuses on the availability of resources and the potential quality of care for individuals in Springville, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 18844), specifically concerning lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and support. It considers factors impacting the overall Lung Cancer Score, including physician accessibility, primary care infrastructure, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. This is not a definitive medical recommendation, but rather an assessment of the local healthcare landscape.

The foundation of any effective lung cancer management strategy lies in accessible primary care. Springville’s primary care availability is a critical starting point. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio within the ZIP code is essential. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the US Census Bureau can provide estimates of the population and the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) within the area. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a greater number of patients per doctor, could potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and a reduced opportunity for preventative screenings, including those crucial for early lung cancer detection. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests easier access to timely care.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. The Lung Cancer Score should factor in the demonstrated commitment of PCPs to preventative screenings, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals. This involves assessing if local practices actively promote and facilitate these screenings, adhering to guidelines set by organizations like the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Practices that proactively engage in patient education regarding risk factors (smoking history, radon exposure, family history) and encourage smoking cessation programs would significantly improve their score.

Identifying standout practices within Springville requires investigating their operational models and the resources they offer. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, including smoking history and screening compliance, would score higher. This allows for more efficient patient management and targeted interventions. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, offering extended hours, weekend appointments, or same-day urgent care slots, would be highly valued.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element in the Lung Cancer Score. The ability to consult with specialists remotely, particularly pulmonologists and oncologists, can dramatically improve access to care, especially in rural areas like Springville. Practices that offer telemedicine consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and even initial consultations would receive a higher score. This technology can bridge geographical barriers and provide patients with access to expertise that might not be readily available locally.

The integration of mental health resources is a significant consideration. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and patients require comprehensive support. The Lung Cancer Score should consider the availability of mental health services within the primary care practices or readily accessible through referrals. Practices that partner with therapists, counselors, or support groups specializing in cancer care would demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient well-being. This includes access to resources that address anxiety, depression, and the emotional toll of treatment.

Further, the Lung Cancer Score should evaluate the availability of specialized medical services. While Springville may not have a major cancer center, the proximity to such facilities in neighboring towns or cities is essential. The ease of access to pulmonologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and thoracic surgeons is a critical factor. The analysis should consider the travel time to these specialists and the efficiency of referral processes from local PCPs. Strong collaborations between primary care practices and specialized cancer centers would significantly enhance the score.

The availability of support services, beyond medical care, is also important. This includes access to patient navigators who can guide patients through the complexities of the healthcare system, financial assistance programs, and support groups specifically for lung cancer patients and their families. Practices that actively connect patients with these resources demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive care and improve the overall patient experience.

Finally, the Lung Cancer Score should consider the overall community health environment. Factors like air quality, the prevalence of smoking, and access to healthy food options can all impact lung cancer risk and outcomes. While these factors are not directly controlled by healthcare providers, their awareness and advocacy for community-based initiatives would positively influence the score. This includes supporting smoking cessation programs, promoting healthy lifestyle choices, and advocating for policies that improve air quality.

In conclusion, assessing the Lung Cancer Score for Springville (18844) requires a multifaceted approach. It necessitates examining physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating the commitment to preventative screenings, assessing telemedicine adoption, and evaluating the integration of mental health resources. The availability of specialized care, support services, and the overall community health environment are also critical factors. A high score reflects a healthcare landscape that prioritizes early detection, comprehensive treatment, and patient-centered care, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for individuals facing lung cancer.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Springville and explore the locations of healthcare providers, support services, and risk factors, we encourage you to utilize CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a visual representation of the data discussed in this analysis, allowing you to explore the healthcare environment in detail.