19043, Holmes, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 19043, Holmes, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.73 percent of the residents in 19043 has some form of health insurance. 34.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19043 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 360 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19043. An estimate of 43 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 301 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 40,874 health care providers accessible to residents in 19043, Holmes, Pennsylvania.

**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Holmes, PA (ZIP Code 19043)**

This analysis evaluates the healthcare landscape within Holmes, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 19043), focusing on factors relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and overall patient well-being. The assessment considers primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment for individuals residing in this area, particularly concerning lung cancer.

Primary care availability is a critical starting point. Early detection is crucial in lung cancer treatment, and regular check-ups with a primary care physician (PCP) often lead to earlier diagnoses. Holmes' primary care landscape needs assessment, including the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas easily accessible to residents. Factors like appointment wait times, the acceptance of new patients, and the range of services offered (e.g., smoking cessation programs, lung cancer screening referrals) are all vital components. A limited number of PCPs, long wait times, or a lack of screening programs would negatively impact the overall score.

Physician-to-patient ratios provide a quantitative measure of access to care. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. The analysis needs to determine the PCP-to-population ratio within 19043 and compare it to regional and national averages. This comparison helps gauge whether residents have adequate access to primary care services. Furthermore, the availability of pulmonologists and oncologists within a reasonable distance is crucial. Lung cancer treatment often requires specialists, and the proximity of these specialists is a significant factor in the overall score.

Identifying standout medical practices is essential. This involves researching practices known for their commitment to patient care, their expertise in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, and their integration of advanced technologies. Are there practices actively participating in lung cancer screening programs using low-dose CT scans? Do they have a multidisciplinary team approach, including pulmonologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists? Practices with a strong track record of early detection, effective treatment, and patient-centered care would significantly boost the score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients who have mobility limitations or live in areas with limited access to specialists. The analysis should investigate the availability of telemedicine services for primary care consultations, specialist appointments, and follow-up care. Practices that offer telemedicine options can improve patient convenience and potentially lead to earlier interventions. This is particularly relevant for patients undergoing cancer treatment, who may have difficulty traveling to appointments.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are crucial for lung cancer patients. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, and access to mental health support is vital for coping with the disease and its treatment. The analysis needs to assess the availability of mental health professionals (therapists, psychiatrists) within the community, as well as support groups and other resources for patients and their families. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care plans would receive a higher score.

The analysis of 19043 must consider the presence of local hospitals and their capabilities. Do they have state-of-the-art diagnostic equipment, such as advanced imaging technologies? Are they equipped to perform complex lung cancer surgeries and offer radiation therapy? The quality and accessibility of hospital services directly impact the quality of care available to residents.

Specific data points are needed to create a truly useful score. This includes the number of PCPs, pulmonologists, and oncologists practicing in 19043 and the surrounding areas. Appointment wait times for these specialists, the availability of lung cancer screening programs, and the presence of telemedicine services must be investigated. The number of mental health professionals available and the existence of support groups are also critical.

The assessment should consider the insurance coverage accepted by local practices. Access to care is significantly impacted by insurance coverage. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, are more accessible to a broader segment of the population. The analysis must consider the affordability of care and the availability of financial assistance programs for patients.

A comprehensive analysis would also include patient reviews and satisfaction surveys. These provide valuable insights into the patient experience, including the quality of communication, the responsiveness of the staff, and the overall level of care. Positive patient reviews can indicate a higher-quality healthcare environment.

Finally, the analysis must consider the availability of transportation options for patients. Access to care can be limited for individuals who lack reliable transportation. The availability of public transportation, ride-sharing services, and patient transportation programs can significantly impact the ability of patients to access medical appointments and treatment.

Based on the aggregation of these factors, a "Lung Cancer Score" for 19043 can be formulated. This score would represent an overall assessment of the healthcare environment, with a focus on factors relevant to lung cancer. The score would reflect the availability of primary care, the physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The score would be a valuable tool for residents seeking to understand the quality of healthcare available in their community, particularly concerning lung cancer.

To gain deeper insights into the healthcare landscape of Holmes, PA (19043), and visualize these critical data points on interactive maps, we encourage you to explore the resources offered by CartoChrome. Their mapping solutions can help you understand the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, identify areas with limited access to care, and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.