19061, Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania Lung Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 19061, Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.26 percent of the residents in 19061 has some form of health insurance. 36.56 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.60 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19061 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,775 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 392 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19061. An estimate of 82 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,423 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 77,470 health care providers accessible to residents in 19061, Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania.

## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Marcus Hook, PA (ZIP Code 19061)

This analysis assesses the availability and quality of healthcare resources relevant to lung cancer detection, treatment, and support within the 19061 ZIP code, focusing on primary care physicians (PCPs) and their capacity to address the needs of potential lung cancer patients. This evaluation considers factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, culminating in an assessment of the overall healthcare landscape in Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, as it relates to lung cancer.

The foundation of any successful lung cancer management strategy rests on early detection. This necessitates a robust primary care infrastructure capable of providing preventative screenings, addressing patient concerns, and making timely referrals to specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio in Marcus Hook, and Delaware County as a whole, is a crucial indicator of access. Low ratios, reflecting a scarcity of available physicians, can lead to delayed appointments, reduced screening rates, and ultimately, poorer outcomes for patients. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health should be consulted to determine the precise PCP-to-patient ratio within the 19061 ZIP code. This data, however, can be a snapshot in time, and the reality on the ground might be different.

Beyond sheer numbers, the characteristics of the practices themselves significantly impact the quality of care. Are practices accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate diverse schedules? Do they have a history of actively promoting preventative screenings, such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for high-risk individuals? Examining practice websites, patient reviews, and publicly available information about the services offered will provide insights into the operational efficiency and patient-centeredness of the primary care landscape.

Identifying standout practices within the community is essential. These are practices that demonstrate a commitment to proactive patient care, employ evidence-based practices, and foster strong relationships with specialists. Practices that have implemented electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate seamless information sharing between providers are particularly valuable. EHRs can streamline the referral process, improve communication, and reduce the potential for errors. Furthermore, practices with dedicated care coordinators or patient navigators who assist patients through the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care can significantly improve patient outcomes.

The rise of telemedicine has the potential to revolutionize healthcare access, especially in underserved communities. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their doctors remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving access to care for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Assessing the telemedicine adoption rates among primary care practices in 19061 is vital. Do they offer virtual consultations? Are they equipped to monitor patients remotely? Do they provide access to online patient portals for communication and information sharing? Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and accessibility.

Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally taxing. The availability of mental health resources is therefore crucial for patients and their families. Primary care practices should ideally have established relationships with mental health professionals, either within their own practice or through referral networks. This ensures that patients have access to counseling, therapy, and support groups to address the psychological challenges associated with cancer. Investigating the availability of these resources and the ease of access for patients is a key element of this analysis.

The overall assessment of the healthcare landscape in Marcus Hook, PA, as it relates to lung cancer, should consider all the factors discussed above. A comprehensive evaluation should examine the physician-to-patient ratio, the characteristics of local practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. By synthesizing this information, a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system can be formed. This analysis aims to provide insights into the quality of care available for those at risk or diagnosed with lung cancer.

The final score will be a qualitative assessment, reflecting the overall strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system. A high score would indicate a well-resourced and accessible system with a strong emphasis on prevention, early detection, and comprehensive patient support. A lower score would indicate potential challenges, such as limited access to care, a lack of preventative services, or inadequate mental health support. The score should be accompanied by specific recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding access to mental health services.

Understanding the geographic distribution of healthcare resources is also critical. Mapping the location of primary care practices, specialists, hospitals, and support services can provide valuable insights into access patterns and identify potential disparities. CartoChrome Maps, with its robust mapping capabilities, can be a valuable tool for visualizing these data points.

For a detailed and interactive map of healthcare resources in the Marcus Hook area, including physician locations, specialist availability, and hospital locations, we encourage you to explore the CartoChrome Maps platform. CartoChrome Maps provides a powerful visualization tool that allows you to understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and identify areas with potential access challenges.