The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 02881, Kingston, Rhode Island is 55 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.35 percent of the residents in 02881 has some form of health insurance. 12.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 88.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02881 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,877 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02881. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 418 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,522 health care providers accessible to residents in 02881, Kingston, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02881, Kingston, Rhode Island
Lung Cancer Score | 72 |
---|---|
People Score | 60 |
Provider Score | 55 |
Hospital Score | 63 |
Travel Score | 46 |
02881 | Kingston | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Kingston, RI (ZIP Code 02881)
This analysis delves into the landscape of lung cancer care within Kingston, Rhode Island (ZIP Code 02881), focusing on the availability of primary care physicians and their impact on early detection and treatment. We'll examine the physician-to-patient ratio, highlight exemplary practices, assess the adoption of telemedicine, and explore the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components in the fight against lung cancer. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Lung Cancer Score" assessment, offering insights for residents and healthcare providers alike.
The foundation of effective lung cancer care rests heavily on accessible primary care. Early detection through regular screenings, facilitated by a strong primary care network, dramatically improves survival rates. In Kingston, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to easier access to appointments, preventative care, and timely referrals to specialists, all essential for effective lung cancer management. While precise figures fluctuate, understanding this ratio is paramount. Researching local data sources and cross-referencing with state and national averages provides a baseline for evaluating the accessibility of primary care within the community.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care delivered by primary care practices is paramount. Identifying standout practices within Kingston involves evaluating several key metrics. These include the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for lung cancer screening, particularly for individuals at high risk (e.g., smokers, those with a family history). Practices that actively utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient risk factors, schedule screenings, and coordinate care with specialists are likely to demonstrate a higher level of proactive care. Furthermore, practices that prioritize patient education regarding smoking cessation programs and the importance of early detection contribute significantly to improved outcomes.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in healthcare, and its adoption within Kingston's primary care network is a key indicator of accessibility and patient convenience. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring, which can be particularly beneficial for patients living in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Its impact on lung cancer care is significant, offering opportunities for remote consultations with specialists, facilitating access to support groups, and streamlining the process of managing chronic symptoms. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration, including the types of services offered and the technologies employed, provides insight into the responsiveness of the local healthcare system to the evolving needs of patients.
The emotional toll of a lung cancer diagnosis is substantial. The availability of mental health resources is, therefore, a critical component of comprehensive care. Primary care practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site therapists or through established referral networks, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient well-being. Access to mental health support can significantly improve a patient's ability to cope with the emotional and psychological challenges associated with the disease, enhancing their overall quality of life and potentially influencing their adherence to treatment plans. Evaluating the availability of these resources, including the types of services offered and the ease of access, is crucial for a complete Lung Cancer Score assessment.
Assessing the Lung Cancer Score for Kingston involves synthesizing all the aforementioned factors. This includes analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio, evaluating the quality of care provided by local practices, assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources. Each factor contributes to a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape, highlighting strengths and weaknesses. The overall score should reflect the community's ability to provide timely access to quality care, promote early detection, and support patients throughout their journey.
To further enhance this analysis, it's essential to consider the specific needs of the population within ZIP Code 02881. This includes understanding the demographic makeup, prevalence of risk factors (e.g., smoking rates), and existing health disparities. Tailoring the assessment to the unique characteristics of the community ensures that the Lung Cancer Score accurately reflects the reality of lung cancer care within Kingston.
The data gathering process for this analysis can be challenging. It involves a combination of publicly available data, such as physician directories and population statistics, along with information obtained through direct outreach to local healthcare providers. This may include surveys, interviews, and reviews of publicly available information about the practices. The completeness and accuracy of the data are crucial for ensuring the reliability of the Lung Cancer Score.
The ultimate goal of this analysis is to provide actionable insights. The findings should be used to inform residents about the availability of care and to identify areas for improvement within the local healthcare system. This may include advocating for increased access to primary care, promoting the adoption of evidence-based screening guidelines, and expanding the availability of mental health resources. The Lung Cancer Score can serve as a catalyst for positive change, driving efforts to improve lung cancer outcomes within Kingston.
This analysis highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to lung cancer care. By focusing on primary care accessibility, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can gain a more complete understanding of the healthcare landscape. This information can be used to empower patients, support healthcare providers, and ultimately improve the lives of those affected by lung cancer.
To visualize and further explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, primary care availability, and other relevant data points within Kingston and surrounding areas, we encourage you to utilize the power of interactive mapping. Explore the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like