The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 02898, Wyoming, Rhode Island is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.21 percent of the residents in 02898 has some form of health insurance. 36.99 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02898 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 239 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02898. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 289 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,926 health care providers accessible to residents in 02898, Wyoming, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02898, Wyoming, Rhode Island
Lung Cancer Score | 96 |
---|---|
People Score | 89 |
Provider Score | 58 |
Hospital Score | 75 |
Travel Score | 60 |
02898 | Wyoming | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Physicians in 02898 and Primary Care in Wyoming
This analysis provides a "Lung Cancer Score" assessment, a hypothetical metric designed to evaluate the accessibility and quality of care relevant to lung cancer patients, focusing on two distinct geographic areas: physicians within the 02898 ZIP code (Rhode Island) and the broader context of primary care availability in the state of Wyoming. This score is not a real-world validated tool but serves as a framework for understanding healthcare landscape challenges.
**02898 ZIP Code: A Microcosm of Lung Cancer Care Access**
The 02898 ZIP code, representing the town of West Warwick, Rhode Island, presents a unique microcosm for evaluating lung cancer care access. The Lung Cancer Score here would consider several key factors, beginning with physician density and specialization. The availability of pulmonologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, and radiation oncologists is crucial. A high concentration of these specialists within a reasonable radius would positively impact the score. Conversely, a scarcity of these specialists, forcing patients to travel long distances, would negatively affect the score.
Physician-to-patient ratios are vital. A high ratio of specialists to the population of West Warwick suggests better access to care. This is particularly important for lung cancer, where timely diagnosis and treatment are critical. A low ratio, implying potential wait times for appointments and consultations, would lower the score. Furthermore, the presence of primary care physicians (PCPs) is also critical. PCPs often act as the first point of contact, responsible for early detection and referrals. A robust PCP network, coupled with efficient referral pathways to specialists, would significantly boost the score.
The quality of the care environment also influences the Lung Cancer Score. The presence of accredited cancer centers, equipped with advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies (e.g., PET scans, advanced radiation therapy), would be a major positive. The availability of clinical trials and research opportunities within the local healthcare ecosystem also increases the score. This allows patients access to the latest advancements in lung cancer treatment.
Standout practices within the 02898 area, if any, would be identified through this analysis. These practices could be recognized for their patient-centered approach, their commitment to early detection programs, or their integration of multidisciplinary care teams. Their success stories and best practices could then be used to inform the overall score.
Telemedicine adoption plays a crucial role. The ability for patients to access consultations, follow-up appointments, and even support groups via telehealth platforms can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. The extent of telemedicine adoption by local practices would positively impact the score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are essential for lung cancer patients. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer can be emotionally and psychologically taxing. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, specializing in oncology, would significantly improve the score. Integrated mental health services within the cancer care pathway are highly desirable.
**Primary Care Availability in Wyoming: A State-Level Perspective**
Shifting the focus to Wyoming, the Lung Cancer Score analysis takes on a broader scope, examining the challenges of healthcare access across a vast, sparsely populated state. The primary concern is the availability of primary care physicians. Wyoming faces significant challenges in recruiting and retaining healthcare professionals, particularly in rural areas.
The physician-to-population ratio in Wyoming is likely to be lower than the national average, especially in rural counties. This scarcity of PCPs impacts the Lung Cancer Score negatively. Patients may face long travel distances to see a doctor, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. The score would reflect this geographical challenge.
The analysis would also consider the presence of specialists, although the focus is on primary care. The availability of pulmonologists and oncologists, even in larger towns and cities, is crucial. If patients have to travel long distances for specialist consultations, the score would be negatively impacted.
Telemedicine plays a critical role in bridging the healthcare gap in Wyoming. The score would be significantly improved by widespread adoption of telemedicine platforms, allowing patients in remote areas to access primary care and specialist consultations remotely. The availability of remote monitoring devices and virtual support groups also enhances the score.
The analysis would examine the presence of community health centers and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). These facilities often provide essential primary care services to underserved populations. Their presence and accessibility would positively influence the score.
Mental health resources are especially critical in Wyoming, given the challenges of rural living and the emotional toll of a cancer diagnosis. The availability of mental health professionals, including therapists and counselors, and the integration of mental health services into cancer care, would positively influence the score.
The analysis would also consider the state's commitment to early detection programs, such as lung cancer screening initiatives. The presence of such programs, coupled with public awareness campaigns, would improve the score. The analysis would also consider the access to smoking cessation programs, which can help reduce the risk of lung cancer.
**Conclusion: A Call to Action with CartoChrome Maps**
This "Lung Cancer Score" analysis, though hypothetical, highlights the complexities of healthcare access for lung cancer patients. The availability of specialists, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the presence of early detection programs are all crucial factors.
Understanding the geographical distribution of healthcare resources is essential for improving access to care. To visualize these disparities and gain a deeper understanding of healthcare access challenges, explore the power of geospatial data and mapping tools. We encourage you to utilize the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps to visualize physician density, specialist locations, and healthcare resource availability in both 02898 and Wyoming. CartoChrome maps allows for the creation of dynamic maps, enabling users to explore healthcare data and identify areas of need.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like