The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 29492, Charleston, South Carolina is 93 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.38 percent of the residents in 29492 has some form of health insurance. 18.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.20 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29492 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,911 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29492. An estimate of 10 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,545 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,897 health care providers accessible to residents in 29492, Charleston, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29492, Charleston, South Carolina
Lung Cancer Score | 97 |
---|---|
People Score | 74 |
Provider Score | 93 |
Hospital Score | 60 |
Travel Score | 64 |
29492 | Charleston | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 29492 (Awendaw, SC) and the broader context of primary care availability in Charleston, South Carolina, considering factors relevant to a "Lung Cancer Score" for physicians. This score isn't a formal, standardized metric, but rather a composite assessment reflecting the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of care, particularly concerning lung cancer.
Assessing the situation begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. This is a critical factor. A higher ratio of patients per primary care physician (PCP) can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial early detection and diagnosis of lung cancer. Data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the US Census Bureau will be necessary to accurately determine this ratio for both 29492 and the Charleston area. A low ratio, indicating a relative abundance of PCPs, would positively impact the score. Conversely, a shortage would negatively affect it.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs is important. Are they concentrated in specific areas of Charleston, leaving underserved pockets? If 29492 experiences a significant shortage of PCPs, patients may need to travel to Charleston for routine checkups, increasing travel time and potentially reducing the likelihood of regular screenings. This geographic accessibility is a key component of the Lung Cancer Score.
Standout practices within the Charleston area will be assessed based on their demonstrated commitment to lung cancer screening and early detection. This includes the implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening programs for high-risk individuals (smokers and former smokers). Practices that proactively identify and refer patients for these screenings, following the guidelines established by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), will receive higher marks.
The availability of specialized pulmonologists and oncologists within a reasonable distance is another critical factor. Patients diagnosed with lung cancer require prompt access to these specialists for diagnosis, staging, and treatment. The presence of a comprehensive cancer center, offering a multidisciplinary approach to care, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and access to clinical trials, would significantly boost the score for practices affiliated with such a center.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, particularly in rural areas and for patients with mobility issues. Practices that offer telemedicine consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and even initial consultations (where appropriate) demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and access to care. This is especially relevant for lung cancer patients, who may face significant challenges traveling for appointments. The availability of telemedicine services will positively influence the Lung Cancer Score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are crucial for lung cancer patients. A cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care model, either through on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, will receive higher scores. This includes access to support groups, counseling, and psychiatric services. The Lung Cancer Score will reflect the availability and accessibility of these resources.
The integration of patient navigation services is also important. Patient navigators help guide patients through the complex healthcare system, coordinating appointments, providing education, and offering emotional support. Practices that employ patient navigators can improve the patient experience and facilitate timely access to care. The presence of these services will positively affect the score.
The Lung Cancer Score will also consider the practice's commitment to patient education and shared decision-making. Practices that provide patients with clear and concise information about lung cancer, treatment options, and potential side effects, and that actively involve patients in treatment decisions, will be highly regarded. This includes providing educational materials, offering smoking cessation programs, and promoting healthy lifestyle choices.
The overall quality of care is another factor. This includes the practice's adherence to evidence-based guidelines, its use of electronic health records (EHRs) to improve care coordination, and its participation in quality improvement initiatives. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement will receive higher scores.
The analysis will also consider the cost of care. While this is a complex issue, practices that offer affordable care options, such as participating in insurance plans and offering financial assistance programs, will be viewed favorably. The goal is to assess the affordability of care for patients in the 29492 area.
The final Lung Cancer Score will be a composite of all these factors, providing a comprehensive assessment of the quality, accessibility, and comprehensiveness of lung cancer care within ZIP Code 29492 and the broader Charleston area. This will help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare.
Want to visualize this complex landscape of healthcare resources? Explore the geographic distribution of physicians, hospitals, and specialized services within Charleston and the 29492 ZIP code with CartoChrome maps. See the data come to life and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like